Cited by 77Neurological disorders and treatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Limbic versus cognitive target for deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: accumbens more promising than caudate

Open access
Millet, Bruno, Jaafari, Nematollah, Polosan, Mircea, Baup, Nicolas, Giordana, Bruno, Haegelen, Claire, Chabardes, Stephan, Fontaine, Denys +16 more·2014·European Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

High-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) represents a major stake for treatment for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We describe a preliminary trial of DBS of two potential brain targets in chronic TRD: the nucleus accumbens (Acb) and, in the event of failure, the caudate nucleus. Patients were followed for 6 months before surgery (M0). From M1 to M5, they underwent stimulation of the Acb target. PET scans allowed us to track metabolic modifications resulting from this stimulation. The caudate target of nonresponders was stimulated between M5 and M9. Patients then entered an extension phase, in which it was possible to adapt stimulation parameters and treatments. Six patients were included and four were operated on. At M5, none of the patients were either responders or remitters, but we did observe a decrease in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores. Three patients were switched to caudate stimulation, but no improvement was observed. During the extension phase, the Acb target was stimulated for all patients, three of whom exhibited a significant response. A decrease in glucose metabolism was observed after Acb stimulation, in the posterior cingulate gyrus, left frontal lobe, superior and medial gyrus, and bilateral cerebellum. An increase in metabolism was observed in the bilateral frontal lobe (superior gyrus), left frontal lobe (medial gyrus), and right limbic lobe (anterior cingulate gyrus). The results of this trial suggest that Acb is a more promising target than the caudate. NCT01569711.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.05.006

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Milett et al 2014 open-label study of four patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 25.0% remission rate at 14 months, measured by HDRS.

    “| | Milett et al | 2014 Open label | N = 4 | 14 | 75.0% | 25.0% | HDRS |”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [60]

  • In the Milett et al 2014 open-label study of four patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 75.0% response rate at 14 months, measured by HDRS.

    “| | Milett et al | 2014 Open label | N = 4 | 14 | 75.0% | 25.0% | HDRS |”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [60]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Aouizerate, B., Martin-Guehl, C., Cuny, E., Guehl, D., Amieva, H., Benazzouz, A., Fabrigoule, C., Allard, M., Rougier, A., Burbaud, P ., Tignol, J., Bioulac, B., 2005a. Deep brain stimulation of the ventral striatum in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder and major depression. Med. Sci. 21, 811 -813. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0924-977X(1400144-8/sbref1)
  2. Mallet, L., Polosan, M., Jaafari, N., Baup, N., Welter, M.L., Fontaine, D., du Montcel, S.T ., Yelnik, J., Chereau, I., Arbus, C., Raoul, S., Aouizerate, B., Damier, P ., Chabardes, S., Czernecki, V., Ardouin, C., Krebs, M.O., Bardinet, E., Chaynes, P ., Burbaud, P ., Cornu, P ., Derost, P ., Bougerol, T ., Bataille, B., Mattei, V., Dormont, D., Devaux, B., Verin, M., Houeto, J.L., Pollak, P ., Benabid, A.L., Agid, Y ., Krack, P ., Millet, B., Pelissolo, A., 2008. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation in severe obsessivecompulsive disorder. New Engl. J. Med. 359, 2121 -2134. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0924-977X(1400144-8/sbref29)
  3. Mattis, S., 1988. Dementia Rating Scale: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0924-977X(1400144-8/sbref31)
  4. Rey, A., 1942. L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encephalopathie traumatique. Arch. Psychol., 286 -340. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0924-977X(1400144-8/sbref39)
  5. Rieu, D., Bachoud-Levi, A.C., Laurent, A., Jurion, E., Dalla Barba, G., 2006. French adaptation of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test. Rev. Neurol. 162, 721 -728. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0924-977X(1400144-8/sbref40)
  6. Sartorius, A., Kiening, K.L., Kirsch, P ., von Gall, C.C., Haberkorn, U., Unterberg, A.W., Henn, F .A., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., 2010. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0924-977X(1400144-8/sbref42)
  7. Spitzer, R.L., Yanovski, S., Wadden, T., Wing, R., Marcus, M.D., Stunkard, A., Devlin, M., Mitchell, J., Hasin, D., Horne, R.L., 1993. Binge eating disorder: its further validation in a multisite study. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 13, 137 -153. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0924-977X(1400144-8/sbref44)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millet, B., Jaafari, N., Polosan, M., Baup, N., Giordana, B., Haegelen, C., Chabardes, S., Fontaine, D., Devaux, B., Yelnik, J., Fossati, P., Aouizerate, B., Krebs, M. O., Robert, G., Jay, T., Cornu, P., Vérin, M., Drapier, S., Drapier, D., Sauleau, P., Peron, J., Jeune, F. L., Naudet, F., & Reymann, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Guillaume Régnier (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
  • Hôpital Pontchaillou (FR)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre Eugène Marquis (FR)
Venue
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
1229-1239
ISSN
0924-977X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985126645
Cited by
77
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medtronic
  • Fondation Pierre Deniker pour la Recherche et la Prévention en Santé Mentale
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, nucleus accumbens, caudate nucleus, limbic system, glucose metabolism, positron emission tomography, anterior cingulate cortex, frontal lobe
MeSH terms
Adult, Biophysics, Caudate Nucleus, Cognition, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Nucleus Accumbens, Prospective Studies, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Deep Brain Stimulation, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review