Cited by 611Neurological disorders and treatmentsTreatment of Major DepressionTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Remission of major depression under deep brain stimulation of the lateral habenula in a therapy-refractory patient

Sartorius, Alexander, Kiening, Karl L., Kirsch, Peter, von Gall, Carl C., Haberkorn, Uwe, Unterberg, Andreas W., Henn, Fritz A., Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas·2010·Biological Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.08.027

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Sartorius et al 2010 case study of one patient with treatment-resistant depression, lateral habenula deep brain stimulation yielded a 100% remission rate at 14 months, measured by HDRS.

    “| | Sartorius et al | 2010 Case study | N = 1 | 14 | 100.0% | 100.0% | HDRS |”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [45]

  • Across the four pooled lateral habenula deep brain stimulation studies totaling 11 patients, the remission rate was 53.6%.

    “Total* | | | N = 11 | | 85.7% | 53.6% | |”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [45]

  • In the Sartorius et al 2010 case study of one patient with treatment-resistant depression, lateral habenula deep brain stimulation yielded a 100% response rate at 14 months, measured by HDRS.

    “| | Sartorius et al | 2010 Case study | N = 1 | 14 | 100.0% | 100.0% | HDRS |”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [45]

  • Across the four pooled lateral habenula deep brain stimulation studies totaling 11 patients, the response rate was 85.7%.

    “Total* | | | N = 11 | | 85.7% | 53.6% | |”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [45]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sartorius, A., Kiening, K. L., Kirsch, P., von Gall, C. C., Haberkorn, U., Unterberg, A. W., Henn, F. A., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A.
Affiliations
  • Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Sartorius, Alexander
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
e9-e11
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002758208
Cited by
611
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 42
FWCI
21.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
major depressive disorder, deep brain stimulation, lateral habenula, treatment-resistant depression, remission, antidepressant resistance, electroconvulsive therapy
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Habenula, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Deep Brain Stimulation, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review