Cited by 93Evaluation and Performance AssessmentHealth Policy Implementation ScienceCommunity Health and Development

Defining sustainability outcomes of health programs: Illustrations from an on-line survey

Scheirer, Mary Ann, Hartling, Gretchen, Hagerman, Diane·2008·Evaluation and Program Planning

Abstract

Evaluative research for questions of program sustainability has expanded substantially in recent years, but definitional issues remain. This paper presents definitions for four different types of sustainability as potential outcomes of health programs. We then illustrate these definitions with descriptive findings from an on-line survey to "look back" at the extent and types of sustainability that occurred among 48 community-based projects that had received short-term funding from a foundation-funded health program in New Jersey. We found that large percentages of respondents reported positively to each of four types of sustainability measures-maintaining program activities, continuing to serve substantial numbers of clients, building and sustaining collaborative structures, and maintaining attention to the ideas underlying the projects by disseminating them to others. Strengths and limitations of this methodology for future evaluation are also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.08.004

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In recent years, sustainability outcomes have been conceptualized as including continuing or improving health benefits, maintaining community-level partnerships, maintaining organizational practices, and continuing program activities.

    “In recent years, sustainability outcomes have been conceptualized as (118, 119, 135) (a) continuing or improving health benefits or outcomes for patients/consumers at the individual level; (b) maintaining community-level partnerships or coalitions and community capacity for collaboration; (c) maintaining organizational practices, procedures, and policies started during implementation (institutiona”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scheirer, M. A., Hartling, G., & Hagerman, D.
Corresponding author
Scheirer, Mary Ann
Venue
Evaluation and Program Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
335-346
ISSN
0149-7189 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016090888
Cited by
93
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evaluation and Program Planning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
Keywords
program sustainability, health programs, sustainability outcomes, program evaluation, community projects, collaborative structures, dissemination, program continuation, customer retention
MeSH terms
Community Health Services, Data Collection, Diffusion of Innovation, Foundations, Health Plan Implementation, Health Services Research, Humans, New Jersey, Organizational Innovation, Research Support as Topic, Program Evaluation, Organizational Policy, Program Development, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review