Cited by 39Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementGynecological conditions and treatments

Evaluation of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in comparison with C-reactive protein as biochemical serum markers in women with endometriosis

Open access
Lermann, Johannes, Mueller, Andreas, Körber, Frauke, Oppelt, Peter, Beckmann, Matthias W., Dittrich, Ralf, Renner, Stefan P.·2010·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To compare high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) with CRP as a soluble serum marker for the diagnosis of women with endometriosis. Design Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Eighty-two women were laparoscopically evaluated. No endometriosis was diagnosed in 34 women (the non-E group). Endometriosis was confirmed by histology in 48 women (the E group). Eighty-two women did not undergo laparoscopic evaluation (the unknown-E group). Afterward, the women were staged according to the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine criteria (r-ASRM). Intervention(s) CRP and hs-CRP were measured initially before laparoscopy. Main outcome measure(s) The hs-CRP and CRP levels and the correlation of those parameters with the stage of the disease. Result(s) There was a trend toward higher CRP levels and higher hs-CRP levels in the E group, while the lowest levels of both markers were found in the non-E group. There was a significantly lower hs-CRP level in the non-E group in comparison with the CRP level in this group. No differences between the different stages of the disease were found with either marker. Conclusion(s) Measurement of the two markers did not appear to be advantageous for the diagnosis of endometriosis independent of the stage of the disease. Nevertheless, a very low hs-CRP level might serve as a marker for an absence of endometriosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.072

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lermann, J., Mueller, A., Körber, F., Oppelt, P., Beckmann, M. W., Dittrich, R., & Renner, S. P.
Affiliations
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
Corresponding author
Mueller, Andreas
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
93
Issue
7
Pages
2125-2129
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990643218
Cited by
39
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
endometriosis, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, C-reactive protein, serum biomarkers, endometriosis diagnosis, endometriosis stage, laparoscopic evaluation
MeSH terms
Adult, C-Reactive Protein, Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Laparoscopy, Substrate Specificity, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Uterine Diseases, Biomarkers, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review