Cited by 652Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthBiomarkers in Disease Mechanisms

Evaluation of Nine Automated High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Methods: Implications for Clinical and Epidemiological Applications. Part 2

Roberts, William L, Moulton, Linda, Law, Terence C, Farrow, Genesis, Cooper-Anderson, Margaret, Savory, John, Rifai, Nader·2001·Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

Background: C-Reactive protein (CRP) can provide prognostic information about risk of future coronary events in apparently healthy subjects. This application requires higher sensitivity assays than have traditionally been available in the clinical laboratory. Methods: Nine high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) methods from Dade Behring, Daiichi, Denka Seiken, Diagnostic Products Corporation, Iatron, Kamiya, Olympus, Roche, and Wako were evaluated for limit of detection, linearity, precision, prozone effect, and comparability with samples from 388 apparently healthy individuals. Results: All methods had limits of detection that were lower than the manufacturers’ claimed limit of quantification except for the Kamiya, Roche, and Wako methods. All methods were linear at 0.3–10 mg/L. The Diagnostic Products Corporation, Kamiya, Olympus, and Wako methods had imprecision (CVs) >10% at 0.15 mg/L. The Iatron, Olympus, and Wako methods demonstrated prozone effects at hs-CRP concentrations of 12, 206, and 117 mg/L, respectively. hs-CRP concentrations demarcating each quartile in a healthy population were method-dependent. Ninety-two to 95% of subjects were classified into the same quartile of hs-CRP established by the Dade Behring method by the Denka Seiken, Diagnostic Products Corporation, Iatron, and Wako methods. In contrast, 68–77% of subjects were classified into the same quartile by the Daiichi, Kamiya, Olympus, and Roche methods. No subject varied by more than one quartile by any method. Conclusions: Four of the nine examined hs-CRP methods classified apparently healthy subjects into quartiles of hs-CRP similar to the classifications assigned by the comparison method. Additional standardization efforts are required because an individual patient’s results will be interpreted using population-based cutpoints.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinchem/47.3.418

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, W. L., Moulton, L., Law, T. C., Farrow, G., Cooper-Anderson, M., Savory, J., & Rifai, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Departments of Pathology and
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Roberts, William L
Venue
Clinical Chemistry
Published
2001-03-01
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
418-425
ISSN
  • 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8561
OpenAlex
W4243536911
Cited by
652
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 38
FWCI
24.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biomarkers in Disease Mechanisms
Keywords
high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, method comparison, detection limit, assay precision, prozone phenomenon, assay linearity, healthy population reference values, coronary risk prediction, assay standardization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Autoanalysis, Blood Donors, C-Reactive Protein, Female, Humans, Immunoassay, Luminescent Measurements, Male, Middle Aged, Nephelometry and Turbidimetry, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic, Regression Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review