Cited by 80Ovarian function and disordersAdrenal Hormones and DisordersSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Antimüllerian hormone levels are independently related to ovarian hyperandrogenism and polycystic ovaries

Open access
Rosenfield, Robert L., Wroblewski, Kristen, Padmanabhan, Vasantha, Littlejohn, Elizabeth, Mortensen, Monica, Ehrmann, David A.·2012·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To determine the relationship of antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels to polycystic ovaries and ovarian androgenic function.Design Prospective case-control study.Setting General clinical research center.Participant(s) Eumenorrheic asymptomatic volunteers without (V-NO; n = 19; reference population) or with (V-PCO; n = 28) a polycystic ovary and hyperandrogenemic anovulatory subjects grouped according to ovarian function into typical PCOS (PCOS-T; n = 37) and atypical PCOS (PCOS-A; n = 18).Intervention(s) Pelvic ultrasonography, short dexamethasone androgen-suppression test (SDAST), and GnRH agonist (GnRHag) test.Main outcome measure(s) Baseline AMH levels were related to polycystic ovary status, testosterone response to SDAST, and 17-hydroxyprogesterone response to GnRHag test.Result(s) AMH levels correlated with SDAST and GnRHag test outcomes. AMH was elevated (>6.2 ng/mL) in 32% of V-PCO versus 5% V-NO. The 21% of V-PCO who met Rotterdam PCOS criteria all had functional ovarian hyperandrogenism, but AMH levels were similar to nonhyperandrogenic V-PCO. AMH >10.7 ng/mL discriminated V-PCO from PCOS with 96% specificity and 41% sensitivity for PCOS-T, and insignificantly for PCOS-A.Conclusion(s) AMH levels are independently related to ovarian androgenic function and polycystic ovaries. Very high AMH levels are specific but insensitive for PCOS. In the absence of hyperandrogenism, moderate AMH elevation in women with normal-variant polycystic ovaries seems to indicate an enlarged oocyte pool.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.059

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polycystic ovary morphology is an inconsistent finding and does not invariably predict the development of polycystic ovary syndrome.

    “Hence, PCOM is an inconsistent finding and does not invariably predict the development of PCOS [82]”
  • In healthy nonhirsute adolescents, girls with and without polycystic ovary morphology have similar levels of androgens, insulin, and indexes of insulin sensitivity.

    “The few reports that have evaluated the hormonal correlates of PCOM in healthy nonhirsute adolescents using transabdominal ultrasonography have found similar levels of androgens, insulin, and indexes of insulin sensitivity in girls with and without PCOM [80,82]”
  • Polycystic ovary morphology, variously defined, has been reported with a prevalence of 30-40%, with a range between 26 and 54%, and has been described in healthy girls.

    “PCOM, variously defined, has been reported with a prevalence of 30-40% (range between 26 and 54%) and has been described in healthy girls [82]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Zawadzki J Dunaif A Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: toward a rational approach Dunaif A Givens J Haseltine F Merriam G Polycystic ovary syndrome 4 Cambridge, MA Blackwell Scientific Publications 1992 377 84

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenfield, R. L., Wroblewski, K., Padmanabhan, V., Littlejohn, E., Mortensen, M., & Ehrmann, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenfield, Robert L.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
242-249.e4
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122813341
Cited by
80
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2012-09-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Research Resources
  • University of Chicago (DRTC P60-DK20595)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Institutes of Health (RR-00055, U54-041859, UL1RR024999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
anti-Müllerian hormone, polycystic ovary syndrome, ovarian hyperandrogenism, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, Rotterdam criteria
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Female, Humans, Organ Size, Osmolar Concentration, Ovarian Diseases, Ovary, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Hyperandrogenism, Anti-Mullerian Hormone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review