The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 154 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biomarkers of endometriosis
Open accessAbstract
A noninvasive test for endometriosis would be useful for the early detection of endometriosis in symptomatic women who have pelvic pain and/or subfertility with normal ultrasound results. This would include nearly all cases of minimal-to-mild endometriosis, some cases of moderate-to-severe endometriosis without a clearly visible ovarian endometrioma, and cases with pelvic adhesions and/or other pelvic pathology that might benefit from surgery to improve pelvic pain and/or subfertility. This overview discusses the diagnostic performance of noninvasive or semi-invasive tests for endometriosis, including panels of known peripheral blood biomarkers, protein/peptide markers discovered by proteomics, miRNA, and endometrial nerve fiber density. Tests with high sensitivity and acceptable specificity have been developed; some have been validated in independent populations and are therefore promising. To make real progress, international agreement on biobank development is needed for standard operating procedures for the collection, treatment, storage, and analysis of tissue samples and for detailed clinical phenotyping of these samples. Furthermore, it is necessary to validate the diagnostic accuracy of any promising test prospectively in an independent symptomatic patient population with subfertility and/or pain without clear ultrasound evidence of endometriosis and with a clinical indication for surgery, divided into cases with laparoscopically and histologically confirmed endometriosis and controls with laparoscopically confirmed absence of endometriosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“At present, such a test does not exist [17, 20].”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Putative endometriosis biomarkers are mostly glycoproteins, growth or adhesion factors, hormones, or proteins related to immunology or angiogenesis [17, 23, 30].”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Despite extensive research, no single biomarker nor a panel of biomarkers in peripheral blood has been validated as a diagnostic test for endometriosis [17, 20].”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“These studies have shown promising results; however, proteomics technologies are costly and time-consuming [23], and there is a need for better standardization and reproducibility of proteomic technologies before they can be used reliably in clinical research projects [17].”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“This can allow researchers to overcome the main pitfalls in the study design and methodology such as small sample size, lack of relevant clinical information inconsistency in sample handling and storage, and technical control of preanalytical sample variability, which contribute to controversial study results in endometriosis research [17].”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“The adoption of validated, internationally agreed upon standard operating procedures (SOPs) for tissue sample collection, processing and storage, and standardized phenotypic and other patient data collection, are crucial to optimise sample quality, reduce variability, and enable cross-centre studies [17, 113, 148].”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Despite the plethora of studies on endometriosis biomarkers, neither a single biomarker nor a panel of biomarkers has been validated for a noninvasive diagnostic test with sufficient sensitivity and specificity [17].”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Pan, Q., Luo, X., Toloubeydokhti, T., & Chegini, N. (2007) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gam063 · Cited by 261
RetractedThe Expression and Ovarian Steroid Regulation of Endometrial Micro-RNAs
Toloubeydokhti, T., Pan, Q., Luo, X., Bukulmez, O., & Chegini, N. (2008) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1177/1933719108324132 · Cited by 83
RetractedBartel (2004) · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5 · Cited by 34,714
MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers
Lü, J., Getz, G. A., Miska, E. A., Alvarez-Saavedra, E., Lamb, J., Peck, D., Sweet-Cordero, A., Ebert, B. L., Mak, R. H., Ferrando, A. A., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03702 · Cited by 9,637
Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection
Mitchell, P. S., Parkin, R. K., Kroh, E. M., Fritz, B. R., Wyman, S. K., Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E. L., Peterson, A., Noteboom, J., O'Briant, K. C., Allen, A., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804549105 · Cited by 7,969
The impact of microRNAs on protein output
Baek, D., Villén, J., Shin, C., Camargo, F. D., Gygi, S. P., & Bartel, D. P. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07242 · Cited by 3,592
Giudice, L. C., & Kao, L. C. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17403-5 · Cited by 3,166
Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996
American Society for Reproductive Medicine (1997) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81391-x · Cited by 3,018
Switching from Repression to Activation: MicroRNAs Can Up-Regulate Translation
Vasudevan, S., Tong, Y., & STEITZ, J. A. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1149460 · Cited by 2,911
Giudice, L. C. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp1000274 · Cited by 1,924
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Becker, 1991, Schedding of ICAM-1 from human melanoma cell lines induced by INF-γ and tumor necrosis factor-alpha: functional consequence of cell-mediated cytotoxicity, J Immunol, 11, 3788
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Endometriosis: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Clinical Management
Parasar, P., Özcan, P., & Terry, K. L. (2017) · Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports · doi:10.1007/s13669-017-0187-1 · Cited by 824
Smolarz, B., Szyłło, K., & Romanowicz, H. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms221910554 · Cited by 560
Lessey, B. A., & Kim, J. J. (2017) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.031 · Cited by 286
Rahmioglu, N., Fassbender, A., Vitonis, A. F., Tworoger, S. S., Hummelshoj, L., D'Hooghe, T. M., Adamson, G. D., Giudice, L. C., Becker, C. M., Zondervan, K. T., et al. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1208 · Cited by 227
Self-citationBecker, C. M., Laufer, M. R., Stratton, P., Hummelshoj, L., Missmer, S. A., Zondervan, K. T., Adamson, G. D., Adamson, G. D., Allaire, C., Anchan, R., et al. (2014) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.709 · Cited by 206
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fassbender, A., Vodolazkaia, A., Saunders, P., Lebovic, D., Waelkens, E., De Moor, B., & D'Hooghe, T.
- Affiliations
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health (GB)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1135-1145
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151444028
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 154
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Keywords
- endometriosis, biomarkers, non-invasive diagnosis, peripheral blood biomarkers, proteomics, microRNA, subfertility, pelvic pain, diagnostic accuracy, endometrioma
- MeSH terms
- Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
