Cited by 206Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project: I. Surgical phenotype data collection in endometriosis research

Open access
Becker, Christian M., Laufer, Marc R., Stratton, Pamela, Hummelshoj, Lone, Missmer, Stacey A., Zondervan, Krina T., Adamson, G. David, Adamson, G.D. +53 more·2014·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To standardize the recording of surgical phenotypic information on endometriosis and related sample collections obtained at laparoscopy, allowing large-scale collaborative research into the condition. DESIGN: An international collaboration involving 34 clinical/academic centers and three industry collaborators from 16 countries. SETTING: Two workshops were conducted in 2013, bringing together 54 clinical, academic, and industry leaders in endometriosis research and management worldwide. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): A postsurgical scoring sheet containing general and gynecological patient and procedural information, extent of disease, the location and type of endometriotic lesion, and any other findings was developed during several rounds of review. Comments and any systematic surgical data collection tools used in the reviewers' centers were incorporated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The development of a standard recommended (SSF) and minimum required (MSF) form to collect data on the surgical phenotype of endometriosis. RESULT(S): SSF and MSF include detailed descriptions of lesions, modes of procedures and sample collection, comorbidities, and potential residual disease at the end of surgery, along with previously published instruments such as the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Endometriosis Fertility Index classification tools for comparison and validation. CONCLUSION(S): This is the first multicenter, international collaboration between academic centers and industry addressing standardization of phenotypic data collection for a specific disease. The Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project SSF and MSF are essential tools to increase our understanding of the pathogenesis of endometriosis by allowing large-scale collaborative research into the condition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.709

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently, the World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project (EPHect) has developed a consensus on standardisation and harmonisation of phenotypic surgical/clinical data and biologic sample collection methods in endometriosis research.

    “Recently, the World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project (EPHect) has developed a consensus on standardisation and harmonisation of phenotypic surgical/clinical data and biologic sample collection methods in endometriosis research [146, 147, 149, 150].”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [149]

  • Variability of patient types included in endometriosis research studies is not solely determined by the surgical characterization of the extent of disease during laparoscopy.

    “The variability of patient “types” included in endometriosis research studies is not solely determined by the surgical characterization of the (extent of) disease during laparoscopy (1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Becker, C. M., Laufer, M. R., Stratton, P., Hummelshoj, L., Missmer, S. A., Zondervan, K. T., Adamson, G. D., Adamson, G. D., Allaire, C., Anchan, R., Becker, C. M., Bedaiwy, M. A., Buck Louis, G. M., Calhaz-Jorge, C., Chwalisz, K., D'Hooghe, T. M., Fassbender, A., Faustmann, T., Fazleabas, A. T., Flores, I., Forman, A., Fraser, I., Giudice, L. C., Gotte, M., Gregersen, P., Guo, S.-W., Harada, T., Hartwell, D., Horne, A. W., Hull, M. L., Hummelshoj, L., Ibrahim, M. G., Kiesel, L., Laufer, M. R., Machens, K., Mechsner, S., Missmer, S. A., Montgomery, G. W., Nap, A., Nyegaard, M., Osteen, K. G., Petta, C. A., Rahmioglu, N., Renner, S. P., Riedlinger, J., Roehrich, S., Rogers, P. A., Rombauts, L., Salumets, A., Saridogan, E., Seckin, T., Stratton, P., Sharpe-Timms, K. L., Tworoger, S., Vigano, P., Vincent, K., Vitonis, A. F., Wienhues-Thelen, U.-H., Yeung, P. P., Yong, P., & Zondervan, K. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • World Endometriosis Research Foundation (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Becker, Christian M.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
102
Issue
5
Pages
1213-1222
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026056052
Cited by
206
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2015-10-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (085235, WT085235/Z/08/Z)
  • Boston Center for Endometriosis
  • J. Willard and Alice S. Marriott Foundation
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2008-13-002)
  • Wellbeing of Women
  • Bayer HealthCare
  • Ernst Schering Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K011480/1)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES014942)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD57210)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD055764, R01HD057210, HD008769-11, HD57210, P50HD055764, Z01HD008769)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, phenome, data standardization, laparoscopic surgery, residual disease, comorbidities, Endometriosis Fertility Index, multicenter collaboration
MeSH terms
Education, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Medical History Taking, Phenotype, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Information Storage and Retrieval, Biomedical Research, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review