Key characteristics and success factors of supply chain initiatives tackling consumer-related food waste – A multiple case study
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are three main types of consumer food waste initiatives: information and capacity building, redistribution, and supply chain initiatives.
“There are three main types of consumer food waste initiatives: information and capacity building, redistribution , and supply chain initiatives.”
From Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions (2019) · cites this paper as Aschemann- Witzel et al (2016)
The indexed Abstract identifies three general types of initiatives and matches the first two categories. It names the third as “retail and supply chain alteration,” not the broader “supply chain initiatives” used in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCollaboration and knowledge sharing are important to the success of future campaigns.
“Collaboration and knowledge sharing (building upon prior initiatives) are important to the success of future campaigns.”
From Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions (2019) · cites this paper as Aschemann- Witzel et al (2016)
The indexed Abstract identifies collaboration between stakeholders as a key success factor for initiatives tackling consumer-related food waste. It also says the study draws lessons from 26 existing initiatives to inform future actions, but it does not identify knowledge sharing as a success factor in its own right. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057 · see citing works
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943 · see citing works
Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050
Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., & Macnaughton, S. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0126 · Cited by 3,197 · see citing works
Current options for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: a review
Mirabella, N., Castellani, V., & Sala, S. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.051 · Cited by 1,166 · see citing works
Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour: Two routes to food waste
Stancu, V., Haugaard, P., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2016) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.025 · Cited by 1,098 · see citing works
Consumer-related food waste: causes and potential for action
Aschemann-Witzel, J., De Hooge, I., Amani, P., Bech-Larsen, T., & Oostindjer, M. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7066457 · Cited by 910 · see citing works
Self-citationSpaghetti soup: The complex world of food waste behaviours
Quested, T. E., Marsh, E., Stunell, D., & Parry, A. D. (2013) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.011 · Cited by 886 · see citing works
Identifying motivations and barriers to minimising household food waste
Graham-Rowe, E., Jessop, D. C., & Sparks, P. (2014) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.005 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Total and per capita value of food loss in the United States
Buzby, J. C., & Hyman, J. (2012) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.06.002 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Evans, D. (2012) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038511416150 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Household food waste behaviour in EU-27 countries: a multilevel analysis
Secondi, L., Principato, L., & Laureti, T. (2015) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.07.007 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Opening the black box of food waste reduction
Garrone, P., Melacini, M., & Perego, A. (2014) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.03.014 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Wasted food, wasted energy: The embedded energy in food waste in the United States
Cuéllar, A. D., & Webber, M. E. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es100310d · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Watson, M., & Meah, A. (2012) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.12040 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
State of the art on food waste research: a bibliometrics study from 1997 to 2014
Chen, H., Jiang, W., Yang, Y., Yang, Y., & Man, X. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.085 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Waste not, want not, emit less
Aschemann-Witzel, J. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf2978 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reynolds, C., Goucher, L., Quested, T., Bromley, S., Gillick, S., Wells, V. K., Evans, D., Koh, L., Carlsson Kanyama, A., Katzeff, C., et al. (2019) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.01.009 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Romani, S., Grappi, S., Bagozzi, R. P., & Barone, A. M. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.093 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Defining upcycled food: The dual role of upcycling in reducing food loss and waste
Aschemann-Witzel, J., Asioli, D., Banovic, M., Perito, M. A., Peschel, A. O., & Stancu, V. (2023) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2023.01.001 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Self-citationPorter, S. D., Reay, D. S., Bomberg, E., & Higgins, P. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.079 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Aschemann-Witzel, J., Giménez, A., & Ares, G. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.002 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Self-citationConsumer perspectives on household food waste reduction campaigns
Kim, J., Rundle-Thiele, S., Knox, K., Burke, K., & Bogomolova, S. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118608 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Consumers’ food cycle and household waste. When behaviors matter
Setti, M., Banchelli, F., Falasconi, L., Segrè, A., & Vittuari, M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.024 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Rohm, H., Oostindjer, M., Aschemann-Witzel, J., Symmank, C., L. Almli, V., De Hooge, I., Normann, A., & Karantininis, K. (2017) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods6120104 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citationA review of factors reducing waste in the food supply chain: The retailer perspective
Pimentel, B. F., Misopoulos, F., & Davies, J. (2022) · Cleaner Waste Systems · doi:10.1016/j.clwas.2022.100028 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Creating resilient interventions to food waste: aligning and leveraging systems and design thinking
Lake, D., McFarland, A., & Vogelzang, J. (2020) · Food Waste Management · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20561-4_8 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aschemann-Witzel, J., de Hooge, I. E., Rohm, H., Normann, A., Bossle, M. B., Grønhøj, A., & Oostindjer, M.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 155
- Pages
- 33-45
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2559607630
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 26.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- SUSFOOD ERA
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Keywords
- supply chain collaboration, success factors, stakeholder collaboration, food redistribution, consumer awareness, capacity building
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
