Cited by 216Consumer Packaging Perceptions and TrendsMultisensory perception and integrationSensory Analysis and Statistical Methods

Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typefaces, names, and sounds

Open access
Velasco, Carlos, Salgado-Montejo, Alejandro, Marmolejo-Ramos, Fernando, Spence, Charles·2014·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

Many studies have documented that people match a variety of tastes, aromas, and flavours crossmodally to other sensory features, such as abstract shapes, names, and speech sounds. These findings have had a significant impact on how the sensory attributes of product packaging are understood and how they can contribute to product communication and hence enhance brand value. Here, we report on a study designed to assess how rounded vs. angular shapes, typefaces, and names, and high vs. low pitched sounds, can be combined in order to convey information about the taste (sweetness and sourness) of a product. Our results support the view that “sweet” tastes are better expressed by means of rounded shapes, typefaces, and names, and low-pitched sounds, whereas “sour tastes” are better conveyed by means of angular shapes, typefaces, and names, and high-pitched sounds. These results are discussed in light of the literature on crossmodal correspondences and predictive packaging design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.12.005

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Velasco, C., Salgado-Montejo, A., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., & Spence, C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Velasco, Carlos
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
34
Pages
88-95
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058946030
Cited by
216
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 4
FWCI
41.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
  • Intellectum (Universidad de La Sabana) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Keywords
cross-modal correspondence, taste perception, sweet taste, sour taste, typefaces, product names, pitch, sound, sensory communication, brand value

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review