Cited by 22Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareInfant Development and Preterm Care

Introducing depression and developmental screenings into the National Programme on Immunization (NPI) in southeast Nigeria: an experimental cross-sectional assessment

Bakare, Muideen O., Okoye, Jane O., Obindo, James T.·2014·General Hospital Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives This study investigates the possibility of introducing depression and developmental screening tools into the National Programme on Immunization (NPI) in southeast Nigeria. The specific objectives were to determine the prevalence of postpartum depression (PPD) among mothers attending immunization clinics and to assess the association of maternal PPD and infant growth in relation to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations.Methods Four hundred and eight (408) mothers completed the sociodemographic questionnaire and the self-report Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The weights, lengths and head circumferences of their infants were recorded, while the WHO recommended equivalents at 50th percentiles were also recorded for each child. The mothers were then interviewed with the major depressive episode module of Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) to make diagnosis of depression.Results About 24.8% and 15.2% of the mothers were found to be depressed using EPDS and major depressive episode module of M.I.N.I., respectively. It was found that maternal PPD is significantly associated with the growth parameters of weights and lengths of the infants studied but not their head circumference.Conclusions NPI may provide appropriate forum for early screening of mothers for PPD and interventions in Nigeria. The NPI would also serve a useful avenue of screening for developmental concerns in Nigerian children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.09.005

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakare, M. O., Okoye, J. O., & Obindo, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki (NG)
  • University of Jos (NG)
Corresponding author
Bakare, Muideen O.
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
105-112
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993148643
Cited by
22
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
postpartum depression, developmental screening, vaccination centers, infant growth, infant weight, infant length, head circumference, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, maternal mental health, integrated screening, South-East Nigeria
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child Development, Developmental Disabilities, Cross-Sectional Studies, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Mass Screening, Maternal-Child Health Centers, Middle Aged, Mothers, Nigeria, Immunization Programs, Depression, Postpartum, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review