Cited by 144Child Nutrition and Water AccessMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPublic Health and Nutrition

Maternal depression and low maternal intelligence as risk factors for malnutrition in children: a community based case-control study from South India

Open access
Anoop, S·2004·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

AIMS: To determine whether current and postpartum maternal depression and low maternal intelligence are risk factors for malnutrition in children. METHODS: In rural South India 72 children with malnutrition were identified from a central register; 72 controls were matched for age, gender, and residence. RESULTS: Major depression in the postpartum period (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.0 to 24.0), current major depression (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 9.5), and low maternal intelligence (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 11.1) were associated with malnutrition in the child. Low birth weight (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 6.8) was also significantly associated with infant malnutrition. Conditional logistic regression adjusting for all other determinants yielded the following results: major depression during the postpartum period (OR 7.8; 95% CI 1.6 to 38.51), current major depression (OR 3.1; 95% CI 0.9 to 9.7), low maternal intelligence (OR 4.6; 95% CI 1.5 to 14.1), and low birth weight (OR 2.7; 95% CI 2.5 to 6.8). The interactions between current maternal depression and low birth weight and between postpartum depression and low maternal intelligence were statistically significant. The level of maternal intelligence was associated with nutritional status. The severity of malnutrition was also significantly associated with major depression during the postpartum period and low maternal intelligence. CONCLUSION: There is evidence for an association between postpartum maternal depression, low maternal intelligence, and low birth weight with malnutrition in children aged 6-12 months.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.2002.009738

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anoop, S.
Affiliations
Christian Medical College, Vellore (IN)
Corresponding author
Anoop, S
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
325-329
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2158246587
Cited by
144
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Christian Medical College, Vellore
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
Keywords
maternal depression, postpartum depression, maternal intelligence, child malnutrition, low birth weight, infant malnutrition, risk factors, rural South India, maternal mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, India, Infant, Infant Nutrition Disorders, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Intelligence, Male, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Rural Health, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review