Cited by 56Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Research Topics

Ecologically assessed affect and suicidal ideation following psychiatric inpatient hospitalization

Open access
Armey, Michael F., Brick, Leslie, Schatten, Heather T., Nugent, Nicole R., Miller, Ivan W.·2020·General Hospital Psychiatry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.09.008

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pseudo-random sampling schedules were most frequently used (57%, n = 13), followed by fixed sampling (26%, n = 6), and combined fixed and pseudo-random sampling (13%, n = 3).

    “(pseudo)random sampling schedules were most frequently used [57%, n = 13 (42, 47, 51, 58, 61, 65, 69, 71, 79, 83, 85, 86, 88)], followed by fixed sampling [26%, n = 6 (45, 66, 67, 72, 80, 82)], and protocols that combined both fixed and (pseudo)random sampling [13%, n = 3 (47, 56, 60)].”
  • Studies frequently (57%, n = 13) reported that participants could provide input about their daily schedules, allowing EMA prompt windows to be adjusted for each participant.

    “Studies frequently (57%, n = 13; (47, 51, 58, 60, 61, 69, 71, 79–81, 85, 86)) reported that participants could provide input about their daily schedules (incl. sleep and wake times), allowing EMA prompt windows to be adjusted for each participant”
  • Approximately one fourth (26%; n = 6) of reviewed studies supplemented signal-contingent sampling with event-contingent sampling, but none used event-contingent sampling alone.

    “Approximately one fourth (26%; n = 6) of studies supplemented signal-contingent sampling with event-contingent sampling [i.e., participants were encouraged to self-initiate additional entries when experiencing STBs (45, 47, 61, 69, 85)], but none of the studies used event-contingent sampling alone.”
  • Affective precipitants (including negative affect, feelings of pressure, and anger/irritability) were associated with increased occurrence of suicidal ideation.

    “Affective precipitants (incl. negative affect, feelings of pressure, anger/irritability) were associated with increased occurrence of ideation (45, 61).”
  • Two reviewed studies required that each participant had an individualized safety plan in place established by their treating physician, and another study instructed participants on how to make one prior to participation.

    “Two studies required that each participant had an individualized safety plans in place established by their treating physician (61, 85), and another study instructed participants on how to make one prior to participation (88).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armey, M. F., Brick, L., Schatten, H. T., Nugent, N. R., & Miller, I. W.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Armey, Michael F.
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
63
Pages
89-96
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894525768
Cited by
56
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH105379, L30 MH114408, R01MH108610, R01MH108641, R01MH112674, R01MH097741, R01MH095786)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
suicidal ideation, affect, suicide risk, psychiatric inpatients
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Female, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Inpatients, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review