Cited by 600Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesPhosphorus and nutrient management

Organic carbon and nutrient release from a range of laboratory-produced biochars and biochar-soil mixtures

Mukherjee, Atanu, Zimmerman, Andrew R.·2013·Geoderma

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.10.002

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mukherjee, A., & Zimmerman, A. R.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Zimmerman, Andrew R.
Venue
Geoderma
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
193-194
Pages
122-130
ISSN
0016-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142246893
Cited by
600
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 11
FWCI
30.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geoderma (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
Keywords
biochar, dissolved organic carbon, nutrient release, nitrogen cycling, phosphorus cycling, biochar aging, leaching, ammonium, nitrate, volatile matter, acid functional groups, ash content, soil fertility, carbon sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review