Cited by 82Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesEconomics of Agriculture and Food Markets

A physically-based model of long-term food demand

Open access
Bijl, David L., Bogaart, Patrick W., Dekker, Stefan C., Stehfest, Elke, de Vries, Bert J.M., van Vuuren, Detlef P.·2017·Global Environmental Change

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.04.003

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a few studies present detailed information on shifts in diet, and their results are mostly not comparable because of differences in food group composition, making wider comparison impossible.

    “Only a few studies 68,69 present detailed information on the shifts in diet, and in most cases the results are not comparable due to differences in the composition of food groups, making wider comparison impossible.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Engel, E., 1857. Die produktions-und konsumptionsverhältnisse des königreichs sachsen. Zeitschrift des Statistischen Bureaus des Königlich Sächsischen Ministeriums des Innern. pp. 1-54.
  2. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Ed.), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Vol. 1: Current State and Trends, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series. Island Press, Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bijl, D. L., Bogaart, P. W., Dekker, S. C., Stehfest, E., de Vries, B. J. M., & van Vuuren, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
Corresponding author
Bijl, David L.
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
45
Pages
47-62
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2616307002
Cited by
82
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Rabobank Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Keywords
food demand projections, consumption inequality, Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, food waste reduction, dietary change, malnutrition, planetary boundaries, sustainable development scenarios, integrated assessment modelling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review