Cited by 39Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningSocial Robot Interaction and HRIPsychological and Educational Research Studies

Conversational agents for fostering curiosity-driven learning in children

Open access
Abdelghani, Rania, Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves, Law, Edith, de Vulpillières, Catherine, Sauzéon, Hélène·2022·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102887

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increased intrinsic motivation in AI-assisted groups aligns with recent research on AI-enhanced learning environments, suggesting AI partners can provide motivational support similar to human instructors or peers.

    “The increased intrinsic motivation aligns with recent research on AI-enhanced learning environments (Abdelghani et al., 2022), suggesting that AI partners can provide motivational support similar to human instructors or peers.”

    From The impact of AI-assisted pair programming on student motivation, programming anxiety, collaborative learning, and programming performance: a comparative study with traditional pair programming and individual approaches (2025) · cites this paper as Abdelghani et al., 2022

    The Discussion (p. 18) explicitly says the incentive agent did not produce higher intrinsic motivation, contrary to the suggested alignment with increased intrinsic motivation. The Motivation measures (p. 17) likewise report no significant difference between agent conditions; the paper does not compare motivational support from AI partners with that from human instructors or peers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When generated by hand, the answer-to-a-divergent-question type of cues showed to be rather efficient in training children's divergent QA skills.

    “when generated by hand, this type of cues showed to be rather efficient in training children's divergent QA skills.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14][14] J. J. Gallagher and M. J. Aschner. A preliminary report on analyses of classroom interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly , 9:183-194, 1963. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdelghani, R., Oudeyer, P.-Y., Law, E., de Vulpillières, C., & Sauzéon, H.
Affiliations
  • Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Abdelghani, Rania
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
167
Pages
102887
ISSN
1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286252734
Cited by
39
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Keywords
chatbots, curiosity-driven learning, curiosity, metacognitive skills, autonomous exploration, elementary school students, question generation, semantic cues, knowledge acquisition, educational technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review