Cited by 677Psychological and Educational Research StudiesPersonality Traits and PsychologyCreativity in Education and Neuroscience

Measuring Epistemic Curiosity and Its Diversive and Specific Components

Litman, Jordan A., Spielberger, Charles D.·2003·Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

A questionnaire constructed to assess epistemic curiosity (EC) and perceptual curiosity (PC) curiosity was administered to 739 undergraduates (546 women, 193 men) ranging in age from 18 to 65. The study participants also responded to the trait anxiety, anger, depression, and curiosity scales of the State-Trait Personality Inventory (STPI; Spielberger et al., 1979) and selected subscales of the Sensation Seeking (SSS; Zuckerman, Kolin, Price, & Zoob, 1964) and Novelty Experiencing (NES; Pearson, 1970) scales. Factor analyses of the curiosity items with oblique rotation identified EC and PC factors with clear simple structure. Subsequent analyses of the EC items provided the basis for developing an EC scale, with Diversive and Specific Curiosity subscales. Moderately high correlations of the EC scale and subscales with other measures of curiosity provided strong evidence of convergent validity. Divergent validity was demonstrated by minimal correlations with trait anxiety and the sensation-seeking measures, and essentially zero correlations with the STPI trait anger and depression scales. Male participants had significantly higher scores on the EC scale and the NES External Cognition subscale (effect sizes of r =.16 and.21, respectively), indicating that they were more interested than female participants in solving problems and discovering how things work. Male participants also scored significantly higher than female participants on the SSS Thrill-and-Adventure and NES Externa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327752jpa8001_16

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Curiosity was measured using the Litman and Spielberger (2003) scale.

    “curiosity (Litman and Spielberger 2003)”

    From Emotional Manipulation by AI Companions (2025) · cites this paper as Litman and Spielberger 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Litman, J. A., & Spielberger, C. D.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Published
2003-02
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
75-86
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
OpenAlex
W1973897901
Cited by
677
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Keywords
epistemic curiosity, sensation seeking, novelty seeking, gender differences, trait anxiety, convergent and discriminant validity, undergraduate students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Students, United States, Universities, Knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review