The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining the core knowledge on facebook
Abstract
Abstract Social networks have become an indispensable activity in people’s lives. A number of previous studies have investigated various social networks and probed in the core knowledge of integrated social networks. While social network knowledge is general and extensive, few studies have delved into the core knowledge of individual social networks, especially Facebook, which is a social network with over 1.7 billion users worldwide. Therefore, this study aimed to elaborate on the core knowledge of Facebook. In this study, a total of 4429 relevant academic papers were collected from the Web of Science, an online electronic database. Then, citation analysis and co-citation analysis were adopted to identify 50 highly cited academic papers to form a co-citation matrix. Finally, cluster analysis and multi-dimensional scaling analysis were employed to determine the core knowledge of Facebook. The research results showed that there are six points of core knowledge: (1) the behavior analysis of users; (2) the social impact of social networks; (3) the influence and application of Facebook in universities; (4) the evaluation of use motivation and theoretical models; (5) privacy risk and interpersonal impression; and (6) the strategies of social networks. The research results could be useful for academic studies and practice in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798 · cited 1×
“Hence, how to improve and maintain self-image and interpersonal relationships (Walther 1996) through social media, and how to reduce negative comments to realize the original purposes of using social networks, remain an essential research direction for future researchers.”
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y · Cited by 2,137
Self-citationWho interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003 · Cited by 1,915
Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook
Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11957454_3 · Cited by 1,895
Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use
Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024 · Cited by 1,728
Online social networks: Why do students use facebook?
Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. O. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028 · Cited by 1,501
Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004 · Cited by 1,260
A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences
Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612442904 · Cited by 1,226
Chou, H.-T. G., & Edge, N. (2012) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0324 · Cited by 1,166
Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439880902923606 · Cited by 1,157
Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on facebook
Mehdizadeh, S. (2010) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0257 · Cited by 1,064
Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns
Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006 · Cited by 987 · cited 1×
“In particular, females are more concerned about their privacy and information disclosure than males (Fogel and Nehmad 2009).”
Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12078 · Cited by 916
Beyens, I., Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.083 · Cited by 847
Barker, V. (2009) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0228 · Cited by 781
Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x · Cited by 732
An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA)
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001 · Cited by 622
Self-citationFace-to-face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online?
Grieve, R., Indian, M., Witteveen, K., Anne Tolan, G., & Marrington, J. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017 · Cited by 609 · cited 1×
“…of Facebook has a positive relation with social capital, which has an effect on the development and maintenance of social correlations and enhances satisfaction with life (Ellison et al. 2014; Granovetter 2005; Grieve et al. 2013; Mahan et al. 2015; Oh et al. 2014; Verma 2014; Zhan et al. 2016).”
Kamboj, S., Sarmah, B., Gupta, S., & Dwivedi, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.001 · Cited by 591
Self-citationPilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001 · Cited by 537
Fardouly, J., & Vartanian, L. R. (2015) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.10.004 · Cited by 522
A stage to engage: Social media use and corporate reputation
Dijkmans, C., Kerkhof, P., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.005 · Cited by 515 · cited 1×
“…al. 2009) and close the gap between enterprises and customers, which helps improve the performance and reputation of enterprises and reduce costs (Dijkmans et al. 2015; Heller Baird and Parasnis 2011), or they can use Facebook to publicize their brands and products (Schivinski and Dabrowski…”
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1996) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02129604 · Cited by 503
Sagioglou, C., & Greitemeyer, T. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.003 · Cited by 387 · cited 1×
“Some have focused on the effect of Facebook on the mind or behavior of users (Lönnqvist and große Deters 2016; Sagioglou and Greitemeyer 2014; Shen et al. 2015), some have probed into the interactions between Facebook users (Brailovskaia and Bierhoff 2016; Mendes et al. 2015), and some have…”
Citizens' adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-015-9613-y · Cited by 373
Self-citationHajli, N., & Lin, X. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2346-x · Cited by 321
Adoption of online public grievance redressal system in India: toward developing a unified view
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Williams, M. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.019 · Cited by 274
Self-citationSearch engine marketing is not all gold: Insights from Twitter and SEOClerks
Aswani, R., Kar, A. K., Ilavarasan, P. V., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.07.005 · Cited by 262
Self-citationInternet Use, Facebook Intrusion, and Depression: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study
Błachnio, A., Przepiórka, A., & Pantic, I. (2015) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.04.002 · Cited by 199
Marino, C., Vieno, A., Pastore, M., Albery, I. P., Frings, D., & Spada, M. M. (2016) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.07.001 · Cited by 117 · cited 2×
“It provides users with excellent opportunities to establish or maintain friendships with others and share information and communicate with friends (Marino et al. 2016).”
Cited by
Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168 · Cited by 4,608
Self-citationThe effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis
Ismagilova, E., Slade, E., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.005 · Cited by 504
Self-citationWang, X.-W., Cao, Y.-M., & Park, C. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.018 · Cited by 236
The Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers’ Cross-Platform Buying Behavior
Zhang, X., & Yu, X. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592246 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Shiau, W.-L., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Lai, H.-H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 43
- Pages
- 52-63
- ISSN
- 0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2884936503
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 73.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.