Cited by 115Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth, Technology, Consumer BehaviorTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Determinants of mHealth success: An empirical investigation of the user perspective

Open access
Birkmeyer, Steven, Wirtz, Bernd W., Langer, Paul F.·2021·International Journal of Information Management

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) applications have become an important tool to support public health, especially in times of increased health awareness in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is still uncertainty about what factors determine successful mHealth services from the users' perspective. Based on the results of a systematic literature review, a qualitative content analysis of available apps and semi-structured user and expert interviews, we derive a structural model with antecedents on user attitudes towards mHealth and user satisfaction with the mHealth application. These variables determine users' intention to continue using the application and their intention to recommend it to others. For verification, we tested the model with a sample of 249 German mHealth users from the "MyFitnessPal" community using structural equation modelling and found that all derived path relations have significant coefficients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102351

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bollen K.A. Curran P.J. Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Wiley series in probability and statistics Retrieved from 2006 Wiley-Interscience Hoboken, N.J http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10300097
  2. Tashakkori A. Creswell J.W. The new era of mixed methods 2007 Sage Publications
  3. Wang W.‑T. Chen W.‑Y. Assessing the effects of mobile service quality on customer satisfaction and the continued usage intention of mobile service: A study of non-gaming mobile apps: Cross-cultural design 2016 Springer International Publishing

Cited by

Authors
Birkmeyer, S., Wirtz, B. W., & Langer, P. F.
Affiliations
German University of Administrative Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Wirtz, Bernd W.
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
59
Pages
102351
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3156218361
Cited by
115
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
22.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
mobile health, user attitudes, user satisfaction, continuance intention, recommendation intention, MyFitnessPal, health apps, COVID-19 pandemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review