Cited by 97Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorDigital Mental Health Interventions

Cognitive-behavioural therapy for adolescents with bulimic symptomatology: The acceptability and effectiveness of internet-based delivery

Pretorius, N., Arcelus, J., Beecham, J., Dawson, H., Doherty, F., Eisler, I., Gallagher, C., Gowers, S. +15 more·2009·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Background The evidence base for the treatment of adolescents with bulimia nervosa (BN) is limited.Aims To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcomes of a web-based cognitive-behavioural (CBT) intervention for adolescents with bulimic symptomatology.Method 101 participants were recruited from eating disorders clinics or from beat, a UK-wide eating disorders charity. The programme consisted of online CBT sessions ('Overcoming Bulimia Online'), peer support via message boards, and email support from a clinician. Participants' bulimic symptomatology and service utilisation were assessed by interview at baseline and at three and six months. Participants' views of the treatment package were also determined.Results There were significant improvements in eating disorder symptoms and service contacts from baseline to three months, which were maintained at six months. Participants' views of the intervention were positive.Conclusions The intervention has the potential for use as a first step in the treatment of adolescents with bulimic symptomatology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2009.05.006

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pretorius, N., Arcelus, J., Beecham, J., Dawson, H., Doherty, F., Eisler, I., Gallagher, C., Gowers, S., Isaacs, G., Johnson-Sabine, E., Jones, A., Newell, C., Morris, J., Richards, L., Ringwood, S., Rowlands, L., Simic, M., Treasure, J., Waller, G., Williams, C., Yi, I., Yoshioka, M., & Schmidt, U.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Leicester General Hospital (GB)
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • Royal Edinburgh Hospital (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • St Ann’s Hospital (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, U.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
729-736
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166674575
Cited by
97
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0606-1043)
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
bulimia nervosa, adolescents, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, online intervention, eating disorders, treatment acceptability, feasibility, peer support, email support, service utilization, eating disorder symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Bulimia, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Satisfaction, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review