Cited by 215Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

The effects of authentic leadership, six areas of worklife, and occupational coping self-efficacy on new graduate nurses’ burnout and mental health: A cross-sectional study

Laschinger, Heather K. Spence, Borgogni, Laura, Consiglio, Chiara, Read, Emily·2015·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background New nurse burnout has personal and organizational costs. The combined effect of authentic leadership, person-job fit within areas of worklife, and occupational coping self-efficacy on new nurses' burnout and emotional wellbeing has not been investigated. Objectives This study tested a model linking authentic leadership, areas of worklife, occupational coping self-efficacy, burnout, and mental health among new graduate nurses. We also tested the validity of the concept of interpersonal strain at work as a facet of burnout. Design A cross-sectional national survey of Canadian new graduate nurses was conducted. Participants Registered nurses working in direct patient care in acute care settings with less than 3 years of experience were selected from provincial registry databases of 10 Canadian provinces. A total of 1009 of 3743 surveyed new graduate nurses were included in the final sample (useable response rate 27%). Methods Participants received a mail survey package that included a letter of information, study questionnaire, and a $2 coffee voucher. To optimize response rates non-responders received a reminder letter four weeks after the initial mailing, followed by a second survey package four weeks after that. Ethics approval was obtained from the university ethics board prior to starting the study. Descriptive statistics and scale reliabilities were analyzed. Structural equation modelling with maximum likelihood estimation was used to test the fit between the data and the hypothesized model and to assess the factor structure of the expanded burnout measure. Results The hypothesized model was an acceptable fit for the data (χ(2) (164)=1221.38; χ(2) ratio=7.447; CFI=.921; IFI=.921; RMSEA=.08). All hypothesized paths were significant. Authentic leadership had a positive effect on areas of worklife, which in turn had a positive effect on occupational coping self-efficacy, resulting in lower burnout, which was associated with poor mental health. Conclusions Authentic leaders may play an important role in creating positive working conditions and strengthening new nurses' confidence that help them cope with job demands, thereby protecting them from developing burnout and poor mental health. Leadership training to develop supervisors' authentic leadership skills may promote the development of person-job fit, thereby increasing occupational self-efficacy and new nurses' wellbeing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.002

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Authentic leadership predicts all areas of worklife, which in turn predict all MBI dimensions of burnout.

    “Authentic leadership predicted all areas of worklife, which in turn predicted all MBI dimensions of burnout [30]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

  • High scores on the Areas of Worklife Scale (indicating greater job congruence) are associated with less likelihood of burnout (4 out of 4 studies supporting).

    “| Areas of worklife (high score on Areas of Worklife Scale) | √ | √ | | 4 out of 4 |”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

  • Burnout predicts mental health problems for newly qualified nurses.

    “one study found that burnout predicted mental health problems for newly qualified nurses [30]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laschinger, H. K. S., Borgogni, L., Consiglio, C., & Read, E.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Laschinger, Heather K. Spence
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
1080-1089
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062470552
Cited by
215
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4
FWCI
32.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  • Partnerships for Health Systems Improvement (PHSI) (PHE-122182)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
authentic leadership, new nurses, burnout, person-job fit, mental health, emotional well-being, nurse well-being, leadership training, acute care nursing
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Burnout, Professional, Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Leadership, Male, Mental Health, Nursing Staff, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review