Cited by 80Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCircadian rhythm and melatoninStress Responses and Cortisol

Differences in cortisol profiles and circadian adjustment time between nurses working night shifts and regular day shifts: A prospective longitudinal study

Niu, Shu-Fen, Chung, Min-Huey, Chu, Hsin, Tsai, Jui-Chen, Lin, Chun-Chieh, Liao, Yuan-Mei, Ou, Keng-Liang, O’Brien, Anthony Paul +1 more·2015·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Objective This study explored the differences in the circadian salivary cortisol profiles between nurses working night shifts and regular day shifts following a slow rotating shift schedule to assess the number of days required for adjusting the circadian rhythm of salivary cortisol levels in nurses working consecutive night shifts and the number of days off required to restore the diurnal circadian rhythm of salivary cortisol levels.Methods This was a prospective, longitudinal, parallel-group comparative study. The participants were randomly assigned to night and day-shift groups, and saliva samples were collected to measure their cortisol levels and circadian secretion patterns.Results Significant differences were observed in the overall salivary cortisol pattern parameters (cortisol awakening response, changes in cortisol profiles between 6 and 12h after awakening, and changes in cortisol profiles between 30 min and 12 h after awakening) from Days 2 to 4 of the workdays between both groups. However, on Day 2 of the days off, both groups exhibited similar cortisol profiles and the cortisol profiles in the night-shift group were restored.Conclusion Nurses working night shifts require at least 4 days to adjust their circadian rhythms of cortisol secretions. Moreover, on changing from night shift to other shifts, nurses must be allowed more than 2 days off work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.04.001

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niu, S.-F., Chung, M.-H., Chu, H., Tsai, J.-C., Lin, C.-C., Liao, Y.-M., Ou, K.-L., O’Brien, A. P., & Chou, K.-R.
Affiliations
  • Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
  • Taipei Medical University (TW)
  • Tri-Service General Hospital (TW)
  • Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital (TW)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Taipei Medical University Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Chou, Kuei-Ru
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
52
Issue
7
Pages
1193-1201
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006140008
Cited by
80
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
salivary cortisol, circadian rhythm, night shift work, rotating shifts, nurses, cortisol awakening response, shift work, rest days
MeSH terms
Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Longitudinal Studies, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Prospective Studies, Random Allocation, Saliva, Work Schedule Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review