Cited by 48Vector-borne infectious diseasesHelminth infection and controlGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Activation of Several Key Components of the Epidermal Differentiation Pathway in Cattle Following Infestation with the Cattle Tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) Microplus

Open access
Kongsuwan, Kritaya, Josh, Peter, Colgrave, Michelle L., Bagnall, Neil H., Gough, Joanne, Burns, Brian, Pearson, Roger·2010·International Journal for Parasitology

Abstract

The cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, and the diseases it transmits pose a persistent threat to tropical beef production. Genetic selection of host resistance has become the method of choice for non-chemical control of cattle tick. Previous studies have suggested that larval stages are most susceptible to host resistance mechanisms. To gain insights into the molecular basis of host resistance that occurs during R. microplus attachment, we assessed the abundance of proteins (by isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) and Western blot analyses) and mRNAs (by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)) in skin adjacent to tick bite sites from high tick-resistant (HR) and low tick-resistant (LR) Belmont Red cattle following challenge with cattle tick. We showed substantially higher expression of the basal epidermal keratins KRT5 and KRT14, the lipid processing protein, lipocalin 9 (LCN9), the epidermal barrier catalysing enzyme transglutaminase 1 (TGM1), and the transcriptional regulator B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein 1 (Blimp1) in HR skin. Our data reveals the essential role of the epidermal permeability barrier in conferring greater resistance of cattle to tick infestation, and suggest that the physical structure of the epidermal layers of the skin may represent the first line of defence against ectoparasite invasion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.10.013

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kongsuwan, K., Josh, P., Colgrave, M. L., Bagnall, N. H., Gough, J., Burns, B., & Pearson, R.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Department of Primary Industries (AU)
Corresponding author
Kongsuwan, Kritaya
Venue
International Journal for Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
499-507
ISSN
0020-7519 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974554445
Cited by
48
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal for Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
Rhipicephalus microplus, cattle ticks, epidermal differentiation, epidermal permeability barrier, transglutaminase 1, Blimp-1, skin proteome
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Ectoparasitic Infestations, Immunity, Innate, RNA, Messenger, Skin, Blotting, Western, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Proteome, Gene Expression Profiling, Rhipicephalus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review