Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 611

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Industry 4.0 adoption and 10R advance manufacturing capabilities for sustainable development

Bag, Surajit, Gupta, Shivam, Kumar, Sameer·2021·International Journal of Production Economics
DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract Industry 4.0 technologies provide digital solutions for the automation of manufacturing. In circular economy-based models, the resources stay in the system as it experiences one of the 10 R (Refuse, Rethink, Reduce, Reuse, Repair, Refurbish, Remanufacture, Repurpose, Recycle, and Recover) processes. These 10 R processes require the development of advanced manufacturing capabilities; however, 10 R processes suffer from various challenges and can be effectively overcome through Industry 4.0 technological applications. Although literature has indicated the use of various Industry 4.0 technologies, little information is available about firms’ views on the degree of Industry 4.0 application in the 10 R based advanced manufacturing area and its ability to achieve sustainable development. The current study aspires to examine how great an effect Industry 4.0 adoption has on 10 R advanced manufacturing capabilities and its outcome on sustainable development under the moderating effect of an Industry 4.0 delivery system. Practice-based view and Dynamic capability view theories are used to conceptualise the theoretical model. The research team statistically validated the theoretical model considering 124 data points that were collected using an online survey with a structured questionnaire. The findings point out that the path degree of Industry 4.0 adoption and 10 R advanced manufacturing capabilities are statistically significant. 10 R advanced manufacturing capabilities are found to have a positive influence on sustainable development outcomes. Industry 4.0 delivery system has a moderating effect on the path degree of I4.0 implementation and 10 R advanced manufacturing capabilities. The study concludes with key take away points for managers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. Albers, 2016, Procedure for defining the system of objectives in the initial phase of an industry 4.0 project focusing on intelligent quality control systems, Procedia Cirp, 52, 262, 10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.067 · DOI
  2. Amoako-Gyampah, 2008, Manufacturing strategy, competitive strategy and firm performance: an empirical study in a developing economy environment, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 111, 575, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.030 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bag, 2018, Examining the role of dynamic remanufacturing capability and supply chain resilience in the circular economy, Manag. Decis., 57, 863, 10.1108/MD-07-2018-0724 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bag, 2018, Industry 4.0 and supply chain sustainability: framework and future research directions, Benchmark Int. J., 10.1108/BIJ-03-2018-0056 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bag, 2020, Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 152, 104502, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104502 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bag, 2020, Big data analytics as an operational excellence approach to enhance sustainable supply chain performance, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 153, 104559, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104559 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bell, 2013, Natural resource scarcity and the closed-loop supply chain: a resource-advantage view, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., 43, 351, 10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2012-0092 · DOI
  8. Bromiley, 2016, Operations management and the resource based view: another view, J. Oper. Manag., 41, 95, 10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cant, 2016, Internet-based ICT usage by South African SMEs: the barriers faced by SMEs, J. Appl. Bus. Res., 32, 1877, 10.19030/jabr.v32i6.9889 · doi:10.19030/jabr.v32i6.9889
  10. Carter, 2008, A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., 38, 360, 10.1108/09600030810882816 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cecconet, 2017, Agro-food industry wastewater treatment with microbial fuel cells: energetic recovery issues, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 43, 500, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.231 · DOI
  12. Chan, 2018, The impact of 3D Printing Technology on the supply chain: manufacturing and legal perspectives, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 205, 156, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Chen, 2015, Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications, J. Clean. Prod., 107, 615, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.009 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Čolaković, 2018, Internet of Things (IoT): a review of enabling technologies, challenges, and open research issues, Comput. Network., 144, 17, 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.07.017 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Dalenogare, 2018, The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 204, 383, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Delic, 2020, The effect of additive manufacturing adoption on supply chain flexibility and performance: an empirical analysis from the automotive industry, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 228, 107689, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107689 · DOI · Paper page
  17. de Sousa Jabbour, 2018, When titans meet–Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 132, 18, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
  18. de Sousa Jabbour, 2019, Sustainable development in Asian manufacturing SMEs: progress and directions, Int. J. Prod. Econ.
  19. Dev, 2019, Diffusion of green products in industry 4.0: reverse logistics issues during design of inventory and production planning system, Int. J. Prod. Econ.
  20. Dubey, 2019, Big data and predictive analytics and manufacturing performance: integrating institutional theory, resource‐based view and big data culture, Br. J. Manag., 30, 341, 10.1111/1467-8551.12355 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Dubey, 2017, Upstream supply chain visibility and complexity effect on focal company's sustainable performance: Indian manufacturers' perspective, Ann. Oper. Res., 1
  22. Dubey, 2016, The impact of big data on world-class sustainable manufacturing, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 84, 631, 10.1007/s00170-015-7674-1 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Dubey, 2015, Building theory of sustainable manufacturing using total interpretive structural modelling, Int. J. Syst. Sci.: Operations & Logistics, 2, 231
  24. Durach, 2017, The impact of additive manufacturing on supply chains, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., 47, 954, 10.1108/IJPDLM-11-2016-0332 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Fahy, 2002, A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment, Int. Bus. Rev., 11, 57, 10.1016/S0969-5931(01)00047-6 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Flynn, 1990, Empirical research methods in operations management, J. Oper. Manag., 9, 250, 10.1016/0272-6963(90)90098-X · DOI · Paper page
  27. Frank, 2019, Industry 4.0 technologies: implementation patterns in manufacturing companies, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 210, 15, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Gimenez, 2012, Sustainable operations: their impact on the triple bottom line, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 140, 149, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Glas, 2016, The impact of industry 4.0 on procurement and supply management: a conceptual and qualitative analysis, International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 5, 55
  30. Gould, 2015, A framework for material flow assessment in manufacturing systems, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 32, 55, 10.1080/21681015.2014.1000403 · DOI
  31. Govindan, 2020, Achieving sustainable development goals through identifying and analyzing barriers to industrial sharing economy: a framework development, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 227, 107575, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107575 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Gunasekaran, 2012, Special Issue on Sustainable development of manufacturing and services, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 1, 1, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.07.005 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.07.005
  33. Gunasekaran, 2017, Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance, J. Bus. Res., 70, 308, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Hair, 2011, PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet, J. Market. Theor. Pract., 19, 139, 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Hannibal, 2018, Additive manufacturing and the global factory: disruptive technologies and the location of international business, Int. Bus. Rev., 27, 1116, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Hazen, 2016, Big Data and predictive analytics for supply chain sustainability: a theory-driven research agenda, Comput. Ind. Eng., 101, 592, 10.1016/j.cie.2016.06.030 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Hazen, 2017, Remanufacturing for the circular economy: an examination of consumer switching behaviour, Bus. Strat. Environ., 26, 451, 10.1002/bse.1929 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Inderfurth, 2005, Impact of uncertainties on recovery behavior in a remanufacturing environment: a numerical analysis, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., 35, 318, 10.1108/09600030510607328 · doi:10.1108/09600030510607328
  39. Jiang, 2016, Reliability and cost optimization for remanufacturing process planning, J. Clean. Prod., 135, 1602, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.037 · DOI
  40. Karimi, 2007, The role of information systems resources in ERP capability building and business process outcomes, J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 24, 221, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240209 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Kawai, 2018, Stakeholder pressures, EMS implementation, and green innovation in MNC overseas subsidiaries, Int. Bus. Rev., 27, 933, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Kolberg, 2015, Lean automation enabled by industry 4.0 technologies, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48, 1870, 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.359 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Kock, 2016, Hypothesis testing with confidence intervals and P values in PLS-SEM, Int. J. e-Collaboration, 12, 1, 10.4018/IJeC.2016070101 · DOI
  44. Kolk, 2010, International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development, Int. Bus. Rev., 19, 119, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Kouedeu, 2014, Production planning of a failure-prone manufacturing/remanufacturing system with production-dependent failure rates, Appl. Math., 5, 1557, 10.4236/am.2014.510149 · doi:10.4236/am.2014.510149
  46. Kumar, 2015, Smart manufacturing approach for efficient operation of industrial steam-methane reformers, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 54, 4360, 10.1021/ie504087z · DOI
  47. Law, 2012, Sustainability development in high-tech manufacturing firms in Hong Kong: motivators and readiness, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 137, 116, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.022 · DOI
  48. Lucianetti, 2018, Contingency factors and complementary effects of adopting advanced manufacturing tools and managerial practices: effects on organizational measurement systems and firms' performance, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 200, 318, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.04.005 · DOI
  49. Malik, 2016, US expects energy savings through smart manufacturing, MRS Bull., 41, 10, 10.1557/mrs.2015.319 · doi:10.1557/mrs.2015.319
  50. Markley, 2007, Exploring future competitive advantage through sustainable supply chains, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., 37, 763, 10.1108/09600030710840859 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Mativenga, 2017, Circular economy ownership models: a view from South Africa industry, Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 284, 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.036 · DOI
  52. Meredith, 1993, Theory building through conceptual methods, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 13, 3, 10.1108/01443579310028120 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Montori, 2018, Machine-to-machine wireless communication technologies for the Internet of Things: taxonomy, comparison and open issues, Pervasive Mob. Comput., 50, 56, 10.1016/j.pmcj.2018.08.002 · DOI
  54. Nunnally, 1994, The theory of measurement error”, Psychometric Theory, 3, 209
  55. Raafat, 2002, A comprehensive bibliography on justification of advanced manufacturing systems, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 79, 197, 10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00233-5 · DOI
  56. Raj, 2019, Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: an inter-country comparative perspective, Int. J. Prod. Econ.
  57. Ren, 2015, How do marketing, research and development capabilities, and degree of internationalization synergistically affect the innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)? A panel data study of Chinese SMEs, Int. Bus. Rev., 24, 642, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Roy, 2014, Predictors of various facets of sustainability of nations: the role of cultural and economic factors, Int. Bus. Rev., 23, 849, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.01.003 · DOI
  59. Ruiz-Benitez, 2019, Achieving sustainability through the Lean and resilient management of the supply chain abstract, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., 49, 122, 10.1108/IJPDLM-10-2017-0320 · DOI
  60. Saucedo-Martínez, 2018, Industry 4.0 framework for management and operations: a review, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 9, 789, 10.1007/s12652-017-0533-1 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Sung, 2018, Industry 4.0: a korea perspective, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 132, 40, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Teece, 1994, The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction, Ind. Corp. Change, 3, 537, 10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a · DOI · Paper page
  63. Teece, 1997, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strat. Manag. J., 18, 509, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
  64. Teece, 2007, Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance, Strat. Manag. J., 28, 1319, 10.1002/smj.640 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Telukdarie, 2018, Industry 4.0 implementation for multinationals, Process Saf. Environ. Protect., 118, 316, 10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.030 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Tortorella, 2020, Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4.0 adoption: an empirical study with Brazilian manufacturers, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 219, 284, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.023 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Winter, 2013, Exploring the integration of sustainability and supply chain management: current state and opportunities for future inquiry, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., 43, 18, 10.1108/09600031311293237 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Xu, 2018, Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends, Int. J. Prod. Res., 56, 2941, 10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Yu, 2018, Operations capability, productivity and business performance: the moderating effect of environmental dynamism, Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 118, 126, 10.1108/IMDS-02-2017-0064 · DOI
  70. Zhang, 2018, Transmission of a supplier's disruption risk along the supply chain: a further investigation of the Chinese automotive industry, Prod. Plann. Contr., 29, 773, 10.1080/09537287.2018.1470268 · DOI
  71. Zhang, 2018, Strategic resource decisions to enhance the performance of global engineering services, Int. Bus. Rev., 27, 678, 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.11.004 · DOI

Cited by

See all 611

Metadata

Authors
Bag, S., Gupta, S., & Kumar, S.
Venue
International Journal of Production Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
231
Pages
107844
ISSN
0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844
OpenAlex
W3037908001
Cited by
611
References
16
FWCI
47.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Industry 4.0 adoption and 10R advance manufacturing capabilities for sustainable development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844
The paper
Bag, S., Gupta, S., & Kumar, S. (2021). Industry 4.0 adoption and 10R advance manufacturing capabilities for sustainable development. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.