The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk: Insights from a literature review
Taroun, A. (2014) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.004 · Cited by 387
Risk paths in international construction projects: Case study from Chinese contractors
Liu, J., Zhao, X., & Yan, P. (2016) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001116 · Cited by 203
Ebrahimnejad, S., Mousavi, S. M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Hashemi, H., & Vahdani, B. (2012) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2011.11.050 · Cited by 156
Park, Y., & Papadopoulou, T. C. (2012) · Built Environment Project and Asset Management · doi:10.1108/20441241211280873 · Cited by 91
Risk assessment of construction projects using Monte Carlo simulation
Qazi, A., & Simsekler, M. C. E. (2021) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/ijmpb-03-2020-0097 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Zou, P. X. W., Zhang, G., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Project Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 601-614
- ISSN
- 0263-7863 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989678580
- Cited by
- 859
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001
- The paper
- Zou, P. X. W., Zhang, G., & Wang, J. (2007). Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China. International Journal of Project Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
