The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of Normal Tissue Complication Probability Models in the Clinic
Open accessAbstract
The Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) review summarizes the currently available three-dimensional dose/volume/outcome data to update and refine the normal tissue dose/volume tolerance guidelines provided by the classic Emami et al. paper published in 1991. A "clinician's view" on using the QUANTEC information in a responsible manner is presented along with a description of the most commonly used normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. A summary of organ-specific dose/volume/outcome data, based on the QUANTEC reviews, is included.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A seminal paper by Emami et al. ( 6 ) summarized normal-tissue tolerances to external photon irradiation as they were known in 1991, and these data have been gradually updated and expanded through other initiatives such as Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) and Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) ( 25 , 26 ).”
From Normal-Tissue Tolerance to Radiopharmaceutical Therapies, the Knowns and the Unknowns (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation
Emami, B., Lyman, J., Brown, A., Cola, L., Goitein, M., Munzenrider, J. E., Shank, B., Solin, L. J., & Wesson, M. (1991) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-y · Cited by 4,488
Trotti, A., Colevas, A. D., Setser, A., Rusch, V. W., Jaques, D. P., Budach, V., Langer, C. J., Murphy, B. A., Cumberlin, R. L., & Coleman, C. N. (2003) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1053-4296(03)00031-6 · Cited by 2,569
Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function
Burman, C. M., Kutcher, G. J., Emami, B., & Goitein, M. (1991) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90172-z · Cited by 1,251
Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: A concept of equivalent uniform dose
Niemierko, A. (1997) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598063 · Cited by 1,231
Graham, M. V., Purdy, J. A., Emami, B., Harms, W. B., Bosch, W. R., Lockett, M. A., & Perez, C. A. (1999) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00183-2 · Cited by 1,221
Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms
Lyman, J. T. (1985) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3576626 · Cited by 1,160
Kutcher, G. J., Burman, C. M., Brewster, L. J., Goitein, M., & Mohan, R. (1991) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90173-2 · Cited by 560
Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms
Lyman, J. T. (1985) · Radiation Research Supplement · doi:10.2307/3583506 · Cited by 537
The Linear-Quadratic Model Is Inappropriate to Model High Dose per Fraction Effects in Radiosurgery
Kirkpatrick, J. P., Meyer, J. J., & Marks, L. B. (2008) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2008.04.005 · Cited by 519
Self-citationTreatment volume and tissue tolerance
Withers, H. R., Taylor, J. M. G., & Maciejewski, B. (1988) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(88)90098-3 · Cited by 446
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Jolles, 1939, Area factor in skin reaction, Br Emp Cancer Campaign Rep, 16
- Niemierko, 1999, A generalized concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD), Med Phys, 26, 1100
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,000
Singh, R. B., Dumot, C., Mantziaris, G., Dayawansa, S., Xu, Z., Pikis, S., Peker, S., Samancı, Y., Ardor, G. D., Nabeel, A. M., et al. (2023) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2023.10.jns231894 · Cited by 6
Avanzo, M., Chiovati, P., Boz, G., Sartor, G., Dozza, F., & Capra, E. (2015) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.11.003 · Cited by 6
“Dose to the organs at risk was evaluated using dosimetric indices which were proven to be related to the clinical radiation-induced side-effects as reported in the review of the QUANTEC task group [24].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialClinical significance of multi-leaf collimator calibration errors
Norvill, C., & Jenetsky, G. (2016) · Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13246-016-0424-3 · Cited by 6
Bhushan, M., Yadav, G., Tripathi, D., Kumar, L., Kishore, V., Dewan, A., Kumar, G., Wahi, I. K., & Gairola, M. (2018) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer · doi:10.1007/s12029-018-0080-9 · Cited by 6
Brix, G., Griebel, J., & Czarwinski, R. (2018) · Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik · doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.11.003 · Cited by 6
Modelling the effects of lung cancer motion due to respiration
Adamczyk, M., Adamczyk, S., & Piotrowski, T. (2018) · Nukleonika · doi:10.2478/nuka-2018-0012 · Cited by 6
Mamballikalam, G., Senthilkumar, S., bos, R. C. J., Basith, P. M. A., & Jayadevan, P. M. (2020) · Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice · doi:10.1017/s146039691900102x · Cited by 6
Marcello, M., Denham, J. W., Kennedy, A., Haworth, A., Steigler, A., Greer, P. B., Holloway, L. C., Dowling, J., Jameson, M., Roach, D., et al. (2020) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.048 · Cited by 6
Du, Q., Gan, Y.-X., Wang, R., Liu, W., Li, J., Liang, F., Li, X., Zhu, H., Ou, X., Zhong, Q., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.599942 · Cited by 6
“considered that the information provided by QUANTEC is generally not ideal for most of organs, and care must be taken to apply it correctly in the clinic (27).”
BackgroundLis, M., Newhauser, W. D., Donetti, M., Wolf, M., Steinsberger, T., Paz, A., & Graeff, C. (2021) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ac36e7 · Cited by 6
Barsoum, M. S., Mostafa, M., Hossieny, H. A. E., Nasr, A. M., Mahmoud, M., & Fouda, S. (2015) · Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1016/j.jnci.2014.11.003 · Cited by 6
Gallucci, G., Storto, G., & Fiorentino, A. (2013) · European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jet246 · Cited by 6
“Our patients were all treated according to the Quantec constraints.(4)”
MethodJia-Mahasap, B., Nobnop, W., Sripan, P., Tharavichitkul, E., Chakrabandhu, S., Klunklin, P., Onchan, W., Muangwong, P., & Chitapanarux, I. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0311855 · Cited by 5
Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors treated with stereotactic radiosurgery
Kim, I., Yan, M., Sourour, M., Heaton, R. K., Faulkner, C., Kalyvas, A., Keilty, D., Cusimano, M. D., Payne, D. G., Laperrière, N., et al. (2024) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11060-024-04864-3 · Cited by 5
Paolani, G., Minosse, S., Strolin, S., Santoro, M., Pucci, N., Giuliano, F. D., Garaci, F. G., Oddo, L., Toumia, Y., Guida, E., et al. (2025) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics17030345 · Cited by 5
“The specific 90 Y kernel was obtained through a custom-designed MC simulation, modeling the particle transport and interaction with tissue-equivalent material, using DOSExyz, which is a well-validated MC code for medical applications [30–34].”
Misa, J., Knight, J., Clair, W. H. S., & Pokhrel, D. (2025) · Medical dosimetry · doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2025.02.002 · Cited by 5
Prostate Cancer in Transplant Receivers—A Narrative Review on Oncological Outcomes
Hanusz, K., Domański, P., Strojec, K., Zapała, P., Zapała, Ł., & Radziszewski, P. (2023) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines11112941 · Cited by 5
“Radiotherapy is relatively rarely used to avoid potential radiation nephritis and graft ureteric stricture [72].”
BackgroundPTCOG Gastrointestinal Subcommittee Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Malignancies Consensus Statement
Choi, J. I., Wojcieszynski, A. P., Amos, R. A., Giap, H., Apisarnthanarax, S., Ashman, J. B., Anand, A., Perles, L. A., Williamson, T. D., Shanmugasundaram, R., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Particle Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100019 · Cited by 5
Radical Prostatectomy in Kidney Transplant Recipients—A Multicenter Experience
Schmidt, J., Yakac, A., Peters, R. W., Friedersdorff, F., Kernig, K., Kienel, A., Winterhagen, F. I., Köpp, F., Foller, S., Quilio, F. D., et al. (2024) · European Urology Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.111 · Cited by 5
“Minimally invasive surgical approaches, such as RARP, have attracted attention in recent decades due to their advantages in terms of postoperative recovery and good functional and onco-logic outcomes [1,9].”
BackgroundWarrender‐Sparkes, M., Tomaszewski, J. M., Ip, C. C. K., Chander, S., Christie, D., Corcoran, N. M., Emmett, L., Finnigan, R., Hayden, A. J., Higgs, B., et al. (2024) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110690 · Cited by 6
Reirradiation for recurrent glioblastoma: the significance of the residual tumor volume
Mansoorian, S., Schmidt, M. A., Weißmann, T., Delev, D., Heiland, D. H., Coras, R., Stritzelberger, J., Saake, M., Höfler, D., Schubert, P., et al. (2025) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11060-025-05042-9 · Cited by 5
“According to the QUANTEC review, the risk of symptomatic radiation necrosis following normofractionated radiotherapy (1.8—2 Gy per fraction) is approximately 5% at a cumulative BED (biologically effective dose) of 72 Gy and increases to about 10% at a BED of 90 Gy assuming an α/ß of 2.9 [32].”
InfluentialRobust PET‐guided intensity‐modulated radiation therapy
Li, H., Bissonnette, J., Purdie, T. G., & Chan, T. C. Y. (2015) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.4926845 · Cited by 5
“[40] Lawrence B Marks, Ellen D Yorke, Andrew Jackson, Randall K Ten Haken, Louis S Constine, Avraham Eisbruch, Søren M Bentzen, Jiho Nam, and Joseph O Deasy, “Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics 76, S10–S19 (2010).”
BackgroundMethodChoi, M., Hayes, J. P., Mehta, M. P., Swisher, A., Small, W. C., Mittal, B. B., MacVicar, G. R., Kalapurakal, J. A., & Sejpal, S. V. (2013) · Tumori Journal · doi:10.1177/030089161309900226 · Cited by 5
Berenguer, R., la Vara, V. D., Lopez-Honrubia, V., Nuñez, A. T., Rivera, M., Villas, M. V., & Sabater, S. (2017) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.12.007 · Cited by 5
Eichkorn, T., Regnery, S., Held, T., Kronsteiner, D., Hörner‐Rieber, J., Shafie, R. A. E., Herfarth, K. K., Debus, J., & König, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.772831 · Cited by 5
“(19, 20) were adhered to and sometimes adapted according to the preserved cranial nerve function, e.”
BackgroundSakanaka, K., Fujii, K., Ishida, Y., Mukumoto, N., Hida, K., Inoo, H., Sakai, Y., & Mizowaki, T. (2021) · Journal of Radiation Research · doi:10.1093/jrr/rrab106 · Cited by 5
Open issues in the therapeutic management of unresectable stage III NSCLC in the immunotherapy era
Catania, C., Piperno, G., Russo, A., Greco, C., Agustoni, F., Scotti, V., Proto, C., Sangalli, C., Patani, F., Santacaterina, A., et al. (2022) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103684 · Cited by 6
Ajdari, A., & Ghate, A. (2016) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.1109/wsc.2016.7822250 · Cited by 5
“For example, for head-and-neck cancer, a dose of 70 Gy is administered in 35 sessions of 2 Gy each (Marks et al. 2010).”
BackgroundYuan, L., Geng, L., Wu, D., Dai, T., Feng, G., & Du, X. (2022) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/s12883-022-02746-7 · Cited by 5
“However, there have no randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of local irradiation and whole vertebral irradiation on pain control in IMRT [6].”
BackgroundNanos, C., Souftas, V. D., Zissimopoulos, A., & Koukourakis, M. I. (2022) · Radiation Oncology Journal · doi:10.3857/roj.2021.01032 · Cited by 5
“Four dose-points of the bDVH chosen for the comparison: D 50% , D 35% , D 25% , and D 15% , where D x% is dose delivered to the x% of the organ volume [22].”
Chen, Y., Zhang, Q., Lu, T., Hu, C., Zong, J., Xu, Y., Zheng, W., Chen, L., Lin, S., Qiu, S., et al. (2023) · Head & Neck · doi:10.1002/hed.27315 · Cited by 5
Miyata, J., Tominaga, Y., Kondo, K., Sonoda, Y., Hanazawa, H., Sakai, M., Itasaka, S., Oita, M., & Kuroda, M. (2023) · Medical dosimetry · doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2023.01.008 · Cited by 5
Hiroshima, Y., Ishikawa, H., Sumiya, T., Murakami, M., Nakamura, M., Ishida, T., Ogawa, K., Hisakura, K., Mizumoto, M., Oda, T., et al. (2023) · In Vivo · doi:10.21873/invivo.13202 · Cited by 5
Yu, L., Baker, A., Kairn, T., Livingstone, A., Trapp, J., & Crowe, S. B. (2023) · Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13246-023-01270-3 · Cited by 5
Langberg, C. W., Horndalsveen, H., Helland, Å., & Haakensen, V. D. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1217424 · Cited by 5
“The radiation dose to the esophagus may thus have been higher than in the present study, Based on the QUANTEC data a mean radiation dose of < 34 Gy to the whole of the esophagus may result in a 5-20% risk for developing ≥ grade 3 esophagitis (18).”
MethodResultInfluentialProton radiation therapy patient selection and impacts of COVID ‐19: A scoping review
Wood, L., Giles, E., Cunningham, L., Le, H. V., Zientara, N., & Short, M. (2023) · Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences · doi:10.1002/jmrs.706 · Cited by 5
Arceo-Olaiz, R., Smith, E. A., Stokes, C. L., Eaton, B. R., & Garcia-Roig, M. L. (2023) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2023.06.018 · Cited by 5
Palliative radiotherapy for hepatic tumors: a narrative review of indications and recommendations
Pennock, M., Klein, J., & Lock, M. I. (2023) · Annals of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.21037/apm-22-965 · Cited by 5
Zhao, J., Ma, C., Gan, G., Xu, X., & Zhou, J. (2023) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-023-02304-6 · Cited by 5
“Many studies have shown that the mean V20 and V30 of patients with RP were 42.0% and 38.0%, respectively, which were higher compared with patients who did not develop RP [40].”
ResultInfluentialTzikas, A., Lavdas, E., Kehagias, D., Amdur, R. J., Mendenhall, W. M., Sheets, N. C., Green, R., Chera, B. S., & Mavroidis, P. (2023) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103169 · Cited by 5
Determinants of cerebral radionecrosis in animal models: A systematic review
Al-Rubaiey, S., Senger, C., Bukatz, J., Krantchev, K., Janas, A., Eitner, C., Nieminen-Kelhä, M., Brandenburg, S., Zips, D., Vajkoczy, P., et al. (2024) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110444 · Cited by 5
Bahl, A., Kapoor, R. K., Tomar, P., Singh, O. A., Gupta, R., & SHARMA, S. C. (2012) · PubMed · doi:10.6092/1590-8577/1212 · Cited by 5
Yang, Q., Chen, Z.-P., Hayase, T., Gomi, A., Higaki, A., Kawahara, Y., Kobari, T., Fukuda, T., Kashii, Y., Morimoto, A., et al. (2012) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nos101 · Cited by 5
Evaluation of unified intensity-modulated arc therapy for the radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer
MacFarlane, M. J., Hoover, D. A., Wong, E., Read, N. E., Palma, D. A., Venkatesan, V., Hammond, A., Battista, J. J., & Chen, J. Z. (2016) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2016.03.010 · Cited by 5
Milano, M. T., Marks, L. B., & Constine, L. S. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4377-1637-5.00013-4 · Cited by 5
Self-citationApplication of optimization model with piecewise penalty to intensity-modulated radiation therapy
Guo, C., Zhang, P., Zhang, L., Gui, Z., & Shu, H. (2017) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.10.003 · Cited by 5
Huang, P., Yu, G., Kapp, D. S., Bian, X., Ma, C., Li, H., Chen, J., Liang, Y., Zhang, Y., Qin, S., et al. (2017) · Medical dosimetry · doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2017.10.002 · Cited by 5
Rades, D., Conde-Moreno, A. J., Cacicedo, J., Šegedin, B., Stanič, K., Metz, M., Rudat, V., & Schild, S. E. (2018) · Anticancer Research · doi:10.21873/anticanres.12316 · Cited by 5
Yu, J. I., Lim, D. H., Park, H. C., Jung, S. H., Jeon, S. J., Nam, H., Kim, B., Kim, S.-J., & Park, J. B. (2018) · Anticancer Research · doi:10.21873/anticanres.12498 · Cited by 5
Optimal modality selection in external beam radiotherapy
Nourollahi, S., Ghate, A., & Kim, M. (2018) · Mathematical Medicine and Biology A Journal of the IMA · doi:10.1093/imammb/dqy013 · Cited by 5
Quality Control of Radiation Delivery for Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers
Jain, S., & Goodman, K. A. (2018) · Current Treatment Options in Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11864-018-0564-7 · Cited by 5
Mukundan, H., Mukherjee, D., Tyagi, K., Taneja, S., Ranjan, S., & Sahu, S. (2018) · Medical Journal Armed Forces India · doi:10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.07.008 · Cited by 5
Whole-liver radiotherapy for diffuse liver metastases improves liver enzymes and related factors
Ito, K., Osawa, Y., Shimizuguchi, T., Ogawa, H., Nihei, K., & Karasawa, K. (2019) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2018.1548776 · Cited by 5
“According to the Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic, the threshold for RILD is a higher radiation dose [11], and to the best of our knowledge there are no reports of RILD induced by 8 Gy irradiation.”
MethodThe Red Journal's Top Downloads of 2013
Zietman, A. L. (2014) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.054 · Cited by 5
Mallick, I., Saha, S., & Arunsingh, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-021-01740-9 · Cited by 5
Lecornu, M., Lesueur, P., Salleron, J., Balosso, J., Stefan, D., Kao, W., Plouhinec, T., Vela, A., Dutheil, P., Bouter, J., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.673886 · Cited by 5
“4) Months since diagnosis: Median [interquartile range] 12[4-50] Comorbidities 22 (53.”
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Pituitary Carcinoma
Mehta, G. U., & McCutcheon, I. E. (2021) · Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69217-9_5 · Cited by 5
van Aken, E. S. M., van der Linden, Y. M., van Thienen, J. V., de Langen, A. J., Marijnen, C. A. M., & de Jong, M. C. (2022) · Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ctro.2022.01.002 · Cited by 5
Banaei, A., Hashemi, B., & Bakhshandeh, M. (2022) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-021-01971-7 · Cited by 5
Alizade‐Harakiyan, M., Jangjoo, A. G., Jafari‐Koshki, T., Fatemi, A. B., & Mesbahi, A. (2021) · Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics · doi:10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_271_20 · Cited by 5
The Efficacy of Radiotherapy without Surgery for External Auditory Canal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Osu, N., Musha, A., Yumisaki, H., Okada, K., Kubo, N., Okano, N., Takayasu, Y., Shino, M., Nikkuni, O., Ida, S., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11195905 · Cited by 5
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)
Gomez, D. R., & Liao, Z. X. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28860-9_12 · Cited by 5
Sinacki, M., Serkies, K., Dziadziuszko, R., Narkowicz, M., Kaminska, J., & Lipniewicz, J. (2017) · Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy · doi:10.5114/jcb.2017.66043 · Cited by 5
Radiation Therapy with a Simultaneous Integrated Boost
Katsochi, D. M. (2017) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/67326 · Cited by 5
Radiation Therapy in Acoustic Neuroma
Krengli, M., Zanoletti, E., & Deantonio, L. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52619-5_11-1 · Cited by 5
“Boari et al. reported a local control of 97.1% with a tumor volume downsizing of 82.7% at 6.5 years follow-up in 523 patients treated with Gamma Knife SRS to a median margin dose of 13 Gy.”
BackgroundInfluentialThomsen, B., & Fairchild, A. M. (2017) · touchREVIEWS in Oncology & Haematology · doi:10.17925/ohr.2017.13.02.117 · Cited by 4
Inoue, T., Okuno, Y., NISHIGUCHI, I., Ikenaga, K., & Mimura, O. (2018) · International Medical Case Reports Journal · doi:10.2147/imcrj.s149592 · Cited by 5
Thomann, B., Sachpazidis, I., Koubar, K., Zamboglou, C., Mavroidis, P., Wiehle, R., Grosu, A., & Baltas, D. (2018) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2018.02.006 · Cited by 5
Fukumitsu, N., Okumura, T., Hiroshima, Y., Ishida, T., Numajiri, H., Murofushi, K. N., Ohnishi, K., Aihara, T., Ishikawa, H., Tsuboi, K., et al. (2018) · Japanese Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1007/s11604-018-0743-2 · Cited by 5
Barrett, S., Hanna, G. G., & Marignol, L. H. (2018) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.029 · Cited by 5
Planned Gamma Knife Boost After Chemoradiotherapy for Selected Sinonasal and Nasopharyngeal Cancers
Díaz-Martínez, J. A., Esquenazi, Y., Martir, M., Citardi, M. J., Karni, R. J., & Blanco, A. I. (2018) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.183 · Cited by 5
Snyder, J. E., Willett, A. B., Sun, W., & Kim, Y. (2018) · Practical Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.prro.2018.10.012 · Cited by 5
Gurjar, O. P., Arya, R. S., Goyal, H., Handa, P., Bagdare, P., Khan, A., Paliwal, R. K., & Mishra, S. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering · doi:10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.767 · Cited by 5
“In case of the children, the single posterior beam is passing through the part of heart, although the doses in both kinds of the plans are very less as compared to the dose constraints for heart (mean dose < 26 Gy and V25 < 10%) [21].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHutchison, A. R., Cartmill, B., Wishart, L. R., Ward, E. C., Hargrave, C., & Brown, E. (2019) · Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences · doi:10.1002/jmrs.332 · Cited by 5
Future options: the potential role of proton irradiation
Maduro, J. H. (2019) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/s0960-9776(19)31129-4 · Cited by 5
“Changing the dose to the OAR’s can result in a higher or lower NTCP value in this way the treatment plan can be optimized tomake the chance of toxicityas low as possible.”
BackgroundInfluentialAsamoah, F. A., Yarney, J., Awasthi, S., Vanderpuye, V. D. N. K., Dadzie, M. A., Fink, A., Naghavi, A. O., Abrahams, A. O. D., Mensah, J. E., Sasu, E., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1097/coc.0000000000000589 · Cited by 5
Splinter, M., Sachpazidis, I., Bostel, T., Fechter, T., Zamboglou, C., Thieke, C., Jäkel, O., Huber, P., Debus, J., Baltas, D., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.564068 · Cited by 5
Kuo, C.-C., Chang, C.-C., Cheng, H.-W., & Tsai, J. (2020) · Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · doi:10.21037/tro-20-49 · Cited by 5
“The dose constraints for OARs used in optimization were based on the Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic Summary (QUANTEC) guidelines (18).”
MethodNemr, M. E., Heymann, S., Verstraet, R., Biron, B., Azoury, F., Marsiglia, H. R., & Bourgier, C. (2011) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/1748-717x-6-154 · Cited by 5
Overlap‐guided fixed‐patient support positioning optimization for cranial SRT
MacDonald, R. L., Robar, J. L., & Thomas, C. G. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12008 · Cited by 5
Meier, V., Besserer, J., & Bley, C. R. (2019) · Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound · doi:10.1111/vru.12815 · Cited by 5
Optimization Problems in Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning.
Long, T. (2015) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 5
Jassim, H. H., Nedaie, H. A., Banaee, N., Geraily, G., Kazemian, A., & Makrani, D. S. (2024) · Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/acm2.14490 · Cited by 4
“36 The planning characteristics of the dCT C -based plan were compared with those of DVHs computed using rCT plan data.”
MethodSingh, R. B., Roubil, J. G., Bowden, G. N., Mathieu, D., Carrier, L., Shepard, M. J., Kite, T. S., Wegner, R. E., Picozzi, P., Franzini, A., et al. (2025) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35931 · Cited by 4
Sen, S., Singh, S., Singh, A. K., Dipesh, Bhushan, M., Mahipal, Tandon, S., & Gairola, M. (2025) · Radiation Physics and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113338 · Cited by 4
The Role of Radiotherapy for Meningeal Melanocytomas – A 20 Year Update
Rades, D., Zemskova, O. V., Gliemroth, J., & YU, N. Y. (2024) · In Vivo · doi:10.21873/invivo.13558 · Cited by 4
Critical review of patient outcome study in head and neck cancer radiotherapy
Chen, J., Yang, Y., Liu, C., Feng, H., Holmes, J., Zhang, L., Frank, S. J., Simone, C. B., Ma, D. J., Patel, S. H., et al. (2025) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2025.100151 · Cited by 6
Dědečková, K., Andrlík, M., Móciková, H., Kaliská, L., Zapletalová, S., Kubeš, J., Al-Hamami, S. F. A., Cutter, D. J., Ntentas, G., Vondráček, V., et al. (2025) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110931 · Cited by 4
Semiz, V., AYDIN, B., Gulsan, D., Atac, E., Duymaz, E. Ö., Kınay, Ş., Akçay, D., Kandemir, R., Can, M., & Görken, İ. B. (2025) · Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/acm2.70216 · Cited by 4
Osborn, V. W., Leaf, A. N., Lee, A., Garay, E., Safdieh, J. J., Schwartz, D. A., & Schreiber, D. P. (2017) · World Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.5306/wjco.v8.i3.285 · Cited by 4
Tini, P., Nardone, V., Pastina, P., Marampon, F., Sebaste, L., Cerase, A., Tombolini, V., Pirtoli, L., & Mazzei, M. A. (2019) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105445 · Cited by 4
Wada, Y., Monzen, H., Otsuka, M., Doi, H., Nakamatsu, K., & Nishimura, Y. (2021) · Medical dosimetry · doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2021.09.002 · Cited by 4
Chiloiro, G., Meldolesi, E., Corvari, B., Romano, A., Barbaro, B., Coco, C., Crucitti, A., Genovesi, D., Lupattelli, M., Mantello, G., et al. (2022) · Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ctro.2022.03.002 · Cited by 4
“The dose to OARs will be assessed according to the dose constraints reported in the QUANTEC report [37].”
MethodSá, A. C., Barateiro, A. P., Bednarz, B. P., Almeida, P. M. D., Vaz, P., & Madaleno, T. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.879167 · Cited by 4
Dashnamoorthy, S., Rajamanickam, K., Jeyasingh, E., Pandey, V. P., Nachimuthu, K., Ahmed, I., & Venkatraman, P. (2022) · Progress in Medical Physics · doi:10.14316/pmp.2022.33.3.25 · Cited by 4
Impact of Adapted Radiotherapy Schedules on Bowel Sparing in Node-Positive Cervical Cancer
Garrett, M. D., Li, F., Lemus, O. D., Lavrova, E., Savacool, M. K., Price, M. J., Kachnic, L. A., Horowitz, D. P., & Chin, C. (2022) · Practical Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.prro.2022.11.012 · Cited by 4
Pathophysiology of Radiation Fibrosis Syndrome
Kline‐Quiroz, C. M., Byrd, H., Dovgan, J., & Lockney, N. A. (2023) · Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports · doi:10.1007/s40141-023-00403-9 · Cited by 4
“Tissues and organs have varying degrees of tolerance to RT, and radiation oncologists utilize establish parameters to guide treatment dosing [40].”
BackgroundSinha, S., Kumar, A., Maheshwari, G., Mohanty, S., Joshi, K., Shinde, P., Gupta, D., Kale, S. N., Phurailatpam, R. D., Swain, M., et al. (2023) · Advances in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.adro.2023.101311 · Cited by 4
Ghassemi, N., Castillo, R., Castillo, E. M., Jones, B. L., Miften, M. M., Kavanagh, B. D., Werner‐Wasik, M., Miller, C. R., Barta, J. A., Grills, I. S., et al. (2023) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109821 · Cited by 4
Choi, J. I., McCormick, B. L., Park, P. J., Millar, M., Walker, K. M., Tung, C. C., Huang, S., Florio, P., Chen, C., Lozano, A. J., et al. (2023) · Advances in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.adro.2023.101355 · Cited by 4
“24 In an study from investigators at MD Anderson Cancer Center, 90 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with de fi nitive chemoradiation with > 55 Gy delivered to the BP and median BP dose of 70 Gy, 16% developed brachial plexopathy at a median follow-up of 14 months.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Marks, L. B., Yorke, E. D., Jackson, A., Ten Haken, R. K., Constine, L. S., Eisbruch, A., Bentzen, S. M., Nam, J., & Deasy, J. O.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marks, Lawrence B.
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- S10-S19
- ISSN
- 0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4041542
- OpenAlex
- W2046701188
- Cited by
- 1,826
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 92 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 125 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 164 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 56.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Lance Armstrong Foundation
- Armstrong Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (CA69579, R29CA069579, R29CA085181, R01CA069579, R01CA129182, R01CA085181, CA85181)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Keywords
- normal tissue complication probability, QUANTEC, normal tissue tolerance, NTCP models
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Humans, Models, Biological, Organ Specificity, Radiation Injuries, Radiation Tolerance, Models, Statistical, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Radiation Oncology, Dose Fractionation, Radiation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review