The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of Normal Tissue Complication Probability Models in the Clinic
Open accessAbstract
The Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) review summarizes the currently available three-dimensional dose/volume/outcome data to update and refine the normal tissue dose/volume tolerance guidelines provided by the classic Emami et al. paper published in 1991. A "clinician's view" on using the QUANTEC information in a responsible manner is presented along with a description of the most commonly used normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. A summary of organ-specific dose/volume/outcome data, based on the QUANTEC reviews, is included.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A seminal paper by Emami et al. ( 6 ) summarized normal-tissue tolerances to external photon irradiation as they were known in 1991, and these data have been gradually updated and expanded through other initiatives such as Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) and Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) ( 25 , 26 ).”
From Normal-Tissue Tolerance to Radiopharmaceutical Therapies, the Knowns and the Unknowns (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation
Emami, B., Lyman, J., Brown, A., Cola, L., Goitein, M., Munzenrider, J. E., Shank, B., Solin, L. J., & Wesson, M. (1991) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-y · Cited by 4,488
Trotti, A., Colevas, A. D., Setser, A., Rusch, V. W., Jaques, D. P., Budach, V., Langer, C. J., Murphy, B. A., Cumberlin, R. L., & Coleman, C. N. (2003) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1053-4296(03)00031-6 · Cited by 2,569
Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function
Burman, C. M., Kutcher, G. J., Emami, B., & Goitein, M. (1991) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90172-z · Cited by 1,251
Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: A concept of equivalent uniform dose
Niemierko, A. (1997) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598063 · Cited by 1,231
Graham, M. V., Purdy, J. A., Emami, B., Harms, W. B., Bosch, W. R., Lockett, M. A., & Perez, C. A. (1999) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00183-2 · Cited by 1,221
Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms
Lyman, J. T. (1985) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3576626 · Cited by 1,160
Kutcher, G. J., Burman, C. M., Brewster, L. J., Goitein, M., & Mohan, R. (1991) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90173-2 · Cited by 560
Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms
Lyman, J. T. (1985) · Radiation Research Supplement · doi:10.2307/3583506 · Cited by 537
The Linear-Quadratic Model Is Inappropriate to Model High Dose per Fraction Effects in Radiosurgery
Kirkpatrick, J. P., Meyer, J. J., & Marks, L. B. (2008) · Seminars in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2008.04.005 · Cited by 519
Self-citationTreatment volume and tissue tolerance
Withers, H. R., Taylor, J. M. G., & Maciejewski, B. (1988) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(88)90098-3 · Cited by 446
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Jolles, 1939, Area factor in skin reaction, Br Emp Cancer Campaign Rep, 16
- Niemierko, 1999, A generalized concept of equivalent uniform dose (EUD), Med Phys, 26, 1100
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,000
Stefanowicz, S., Stützer, K., Zschaeck, S., Jakobi, A., & Troost, E. G. C. (2018) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-018-1165-0 · Cited by 20
Begosh-Mayne, D., Kumar, S. S., Toffel, S., Okunieff, P. G., & O’Dell, W. G. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67499-0 · Cited by 20
Cook, A., Modh, A., Ali, H. Y., Sheqwara, J. Z., Chang, S., Ghanem, T., Momin, S. R., Wu, V., Tam, S. H., Money, S. R., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.11.012 · Cited by 20
Bernchou, U., Christiansen, R. L., Asmussen, J. T., Schytte, T., Hansen, O., & Brink, C. (2017) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2017.02.001 · Cited by 20
Piras, A., Corso, R., Benfante, V., Ali, M. U., Laudicella, R., Alongi, P., D’Aviero, A., Cusumano, D., Boldrini, L., Salvaggio, G., et al. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app142310947 · Cited by 23
Radiotherapy for recurrent epidermoid cyst
Davies, J. M., Trinh, V. T., Sneed, P. K., & McDermott, M. W. (2013) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11060-013-1065-y · Cited by 19
“sensorineural hearing loss for mean dose to cochlea B45 Gy [25].”
BackgroundFeasibility of the partial-single arc technique in RapidArc planning for prostate cancer treatment
Rana, S. B., & Cheng, C. (2013) · 癌症:英文版 · doi:10.5732/cjc.013.10077 · Cited by 19
Effectiveness of Carbon Ion Radiation in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Liermann, J., Naumann, P., Weykamp, F., Hoegen, P., Debus, J., & Herfarth, K. K. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.708884 · Cited by 19
“This is due to the gastrointestinal tract which is highly sensitive to radiotherapy and which is situated adjacent to the pancreas (9, 10).”
BackgroundExternal radiotherapy for prostatic cancers
de Crevoisier, R., Supiot, S., Créhange, G., Pommier, P., Latorzeff, I., Chapet, O., Pasquier, D., Blanchard, P., Schick, U., Marchesi, V., et al. (2021) · Cancer/Radiothérapie · doi:10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.017 · Cited by 19
Mori, Y., Okonogi, N., Matsumoto, S., Furuichi, W., Fukahori, M., Miyasaka, Y., Murata, K., Wakatsuki, M., Imai, R., Koto, M., et al. (2022) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.008 · Cited by 19
“Next, dose parameters were determined using dose-volume histograms (DVHs) [30].”
MethodMiller, R., Castillo, R., Castillo, E. M., Jones, B. L., Miften, M. M., Kavanagh, B. D., Lü, B., Werner‐Wasik, M., Ghassemi, N., Lombardo, J., et al. (2022) · Advances in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.adro.2022.101133 · Cited by 19
“Planning was performed using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) techniques and institutions followed Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC), RTOG 0617, NRG LU 001, and RTOG 0538 guidelines and dose constraints (30-32).”
MethodThe Recent Management of Vestibular Schwannoma Radiotherapy: A Narrative Review of the Literature
Brun, L., Mom, T., Guillemin, F., Puechmaille, M., Khalil, T., & Biau, J. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13061611 · Cited by 19
“For fractionated treatments, Marks et al. [62] reported hearing loss in 37% of patients who received doses greater than 60 Gy to the inner ear compared with 5% of those who received lower doses.”
BackgroundSelek, U., Bölükbaşı, Y., Welsh, J. W., & Topkan, E. (2014) · Balkan Medical Journal · doi:10.5152/balkanmedj.2014.14529 · Cited by 19
“As clinicians respect dose-volume constraints to reduce the acute and late side effects of radiotherapy, there is an ongoing effort in the quantitative analysis of radiotherapy effects on normal tissue for updated dose volume constraints, as well as generating atlases for decreasing inter-observer variability (17-19).”
BackgroundLühr, A., Löck, S., Roth, K., Helmbrecht, S., Jakobi, A., Petersen, J. B. B., Just, U., Krause, M., Enghardt, W., & Baumann, M. A. (2014) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/1748-717x-9-59 · Cited by 19
“This may also include the application of available state-of-the-art tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability models [4,5].”
BackgroundChatterjee, S., Willis, N., Locks, S. M., Mott, J. H. L., & Kelly, C. G. (2011) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr/53812025 · Cited by 19
“Although the possible limitations of QUANTEC studies have been highlighted [35], the new data may well be more accurate clinically.”
MethodSabatino, M., Kretschmer, M., Zink, K., & Würschmidt, F. (2012) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/1748-717x-7-7 · Cited by 19
Treatment outcome of hepatic re-irradiation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Seol, S. W., Yu, J. I., Park, H. C., Lim, D. H., Oh, D., Noh, J. M., Cho, W. K., & Paik, S. W. (2015) · Radiation Oncology Journal · doi:10.3857/roj.2015.33.4.276 · Cited by 19
“The tumor response rates were 81.0% and 45.5% in patients receiving ≥45 Gy10 and 45 Gy10, respectively (p = 0.016).”
MethodInfluentialKaur, I., Rawat, S., Ahlawat, P., Kakria, A., Gupta, G., Saxena, U., & Mishra, M. (2016) · Journal of Medical Physics · doi:10.4103/0971-6203.181640 · Cited by 19
“OARs were evaluated as per the QUANTEC guidelines.[9] Table 1: Patient and disease‐related characteristics”
MethodPokhrel, D., Sood, S. S., McClinton, C., Shen, X., Lominska, C. E., Saleh, H., Badkul, R., Jiang, H., Mitchell, M. P., & Wang, F. (2016) · Medical dosimetry · doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2016.08.001 · Cited by 19
A Chemical Modulator of p53 Transactivation that Acts as a Radioprotective Agonist
Morita, A., Takahashi, I., Sasatani, M., Aoki, S., Wang, B., Ariyasu, S., Tanaka, K., Yamaguchi, T., Sawa, A., Nishi, Y., et al. (2017) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-16-0554 · Cited by 19
Treatment of spinal metastases in renal cell carcinoma: A critical review
Teyssonneau, D., Gross‐Goupil, M., Domblides, C., Haaser, T., Pointillart, V., Daste, A., Hauger, O., & Ravaud, A. (2018) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.02.017 · Cited by 20
A convex optimization approach to radiation treatment planning with dose constraints
Fu, A., Ungun, B., Xing, L., & Boyd, S. (2018) · Optimization and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11081-018-9409-2 · Cited by 21
“We plan the case with the prescription detailed in Table 1, which is adapted from the QUANTEC guidelines [MYJ10].”
MethodArmstrong, K., Ward, J., Hughes, N., Mihai, A., Blayney, A. J. M., Mascott, C. R., Killeen, R. P., & Armstrong, J. (2018) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2018.08.018 · Cited by 19
Adjuvant therapy in stage III endometrial cancer confined to the pelvis
Albeesh, R., Turgeon, G., Alfieri, J., Mansure, J. J., Fu, L., Arseneau, J., Zeng, X. Z., Jardon, K., Gilbert, L., & Souhami, L. (2018) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.002 · Cited by 19
Gaggi, G., Credico, A. D., Izzicupo, P., Iannetti, G., Baldassarre, A. D., & Ghinassi, B. (2021) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines9070754 · Cited by 19
Review – Late toxicity of abdominal and pelvic radiotherapy for childhood cancer
Hessels, A. C., Langendijk, J. A., Gawryszuk, A., Heersters, M. A. A. M., van der Salm, N. L. M., Tissing, W. J. E., van der Weide, H. L., & Maduro, J. H. (2022) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.029 · Cited by 19
Fan, L., Luo, Y., Xu, J., He, L., Wang, J., & Du, X. (2014) · Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics · doi:10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4624 · Cited by 19
“In Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2014 this study, CTA was evaluated for the purpose of delineating the LAD.”
BackgroundInfluentialReis, T., Khazzaka, E., Welzel, G., Wenz, F. K., Hofheinz, R., & Mai, S. (2015) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-015-0336-5 · Cited by 19
“about which parameters of the dose-volume histogram (DVH) are to be optimized are rare [8,9].”
BackgroundConsenso Mexicano sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer mamario
Cárdenas-Sánchez, J., Bargalló‐Rocha, E., Piña, V. B., Cervantes-Sánchez, M. G., Erazo-Valle-Solís, A. A., Flores-Balcázar, C. H., Maffuz‐Aziz, A., Pérez-Sánchez, V. M., Poitevin‐Chacón, A., González, E. S., et al. (2018) · Gaceta Mexicana de Oncología · doi:10.24875/j.gamo.m18000133 · Cited by 18
Zhao, Y., Diao, P., Zhang, D., Wu, J., Xin, X., Fontanarosa, D., Liu, M., Li, J., & Orlandini, L. C. (2020) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.554131 · Cited by 18
“For OARs standard dose limits were used (33, 34) aiming at keeping a heart Dm under 2 Gy and less than 15% of the left lung receiving less than 20 Gy (10).”
MethodKopčalić, K., Matić, I. Z., Besu, I., Stanković, V., Bukumirić, Z., Stanojković, T., Stepanović, A., & Nikitović, M. (2022) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-022-10255-6 · Cited by 18
Singh, R. B., Bowden, G. N., Mathieu, D., Perlow, H. K., Palmer, J. D., Elhamdani, S., Shepard, M. J., Liang, Y., Nabeel, A. M., Reda, W. A. H., et al. (2023) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000002456 · Cited by 19
“Median number of brain metastases (range) 1 (1-47)”
BackgroundGao, Y., Wu, F., He, W., Cai, Z., Pang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Antioxidants and Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2022.0161 · Cited by 18
“Marks et al. (2010) estimated a dose–volume limit for hearing at 14–15 Gy in a single dose clinically.”
Piotrowski, T., Kaźmierska, J., Sokołowski, A., Skórska, M., Jodda, A., Ryczkowski, A., Cholewiński, W., & Bąk, B. (2013) · Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1111/1754-9485.12056 · Cited by 18
Antoni, D., Natarajan‐Amé, S., Meyer, P., Niederst, C., Bourahla, K., & Noël, G. (2013) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/1748-717x-8-112 · Cited by 18
“The V5Gy, V20Gy and V30Gy for both lungs minus the PTV were limited, respectively, to 60%, 30% and 20% [36-40].”
BackgroundPelvic radiotherapy after renal transplantation.
Dahlke, S., Schwarz, A., Bruns, F., Bremer, M., Miemietz, M., Christiansen, H., & Meyer, A. A. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 18
Stereotactic radiation therapy for skull base recurrences: Is a salvage approach still possible?
Krengli, M., Apicella, G., Deantonio, L., Paolini, M., & Masini, L. (2014) · Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.rpor.2014.10.007 · Cited by 18
Linear accelerator radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: Updated literature review
Yahya, S., Heyes, G., Nightingale, P., Lamin, S. M., Chavda, S. V., Geh, I., Spooner, D. A., Cruickshank, G., & Sanghera, P. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2016.12.015 · Cited by 18
Boman, E. L., Kapanen, M. K., Pickup, L., & Lahtela, S.-L. (2017) · Medical dosimetry · doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2017.06.006 · Cited by 18
Li, Y.-C., Chen, F.-P., Zhou, G., Zhu, J.-H., Hu, J., Kang, D.-H., Wu, C., Lin, L. C., Wang, X.-J., Ma, J., et al. (2017) · Oral Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.08.011 · Cited by 18
Sprave, T., Verma, V., Forster, R. E., Schlampp, I., Hees, K., Bruckner, T. M., Bostel, T., Shafie, R. A. E., Nicolay, N. H., Debus, J., et al. (2018) · Anticancer Research · doi:10.21873/anticanres.12813 · Cited by 18
Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Node-positive Prostate Cancer
Mallick, I., Das, A., & Arunsingh, M. A. (2019) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2019.01.004 · Cited by 18
Diehl, C., Schwendner, M. J., Sollmann, N., Oechsner, M., Meyer, B., Combs, S. E., & Krieg, S. M. (2019) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.029 · Cited by 18
Guidelines for Radiotherapy of Esophageal Carcinoma (2020 Edition)
Gong, H., & Li, B. (2021) · Precision Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1002/pro6.1119 · Cited by 18
A Systematic Review on Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Mediastinal Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Buglione, M., Guerini, A. E., Filippi, A. R., Spiazzi, L., Pasinetti, N., Magli, A., Toraci, C., Borghetti, P., Triggiani, L., Alghisi, A., et al. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103437 · Cited by 18
Radiotherapy of spinal cord gliomas
Corradini, S., Hadi, I., Hankel, V., Ertl, L., Ganswindt, U., Belka, C., & Niyazi, M. (2015) · Strahlentherapie und Onkologie · doi:10.1007/s00066-015-0917-0 · Cited by 18
Radiation-Associated Toxicities in the Treatment of High-Grade Gliomas
Diaz, A. Z., & Choi, M. (2014) · Seminars in Oncology · doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.06.001 · Cited by 18
Moiseenko, V., Einck, J. P., Murphy, J. D., Ödén, J., Bjöhle, J., Uzan, J., & Gagliardi, G. (2016) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2016.1234067 · Cited by 18
“3 was 72 IU/ml [upper limit of normal (ULN): 30 IU/ml], and she was offered exemestane 25 mg daily and everolimus 10 mg daily in January 2013 based on the results of the BOLERO-2 study [2].”
MethodDutz, A., Agolli, L., Baumann, M. A., Troost, E. G. C., Krause, M., Hölscher, T., & Löck, S. (2019) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2019.1581373 · Cited by 18
A Risk-Adjusted Control Chart to Evaluate Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Plan Quality
Roy, A., Cutright, D., Gopalakrishnan, M., Yeh, A. B., & Mittal, B. B. (2019) · Advances in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.adro.2019.11.006 · Cited by 18
“Furthermore, the typical treatment planning approval process in a clinical setting involves comparing maximum dose and DVH criteria for the OARs to established guidelines, such as Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic.(23) These guidelines are”
MethodTini, P., Nardone, V., Pastina, P., Battaglia, G., Miracco, C., Sebaste, L., Rubino, G. F., Cerase, A., & Pirtoli, L. (2017) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2017/9461402 · Cited by 17
Sun, Q. F., Mao, W., Jiang, H., Zhang, X., Xiao, J., & Lian, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15010071 · Cited by 17
Doyen, J., Besse, B., Texier, M., Bonnet, N., & Lévy, A. (2021) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2021.10.008 · Cited by 17
Treatment plan comparison of proton vs photon radiotherapy for lower-grade gliomas
Byskov, C., Hansen, C., Dahlrot, R., Haldbo-Classen, L., Haslund, C., Kjaer-Kristoffersen, F., Kristensen, T. O., Lassen-Ramshad, Y., Lukacova, S., Muhic, A., et al. (2021) · Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.phro.2021.11.008 · Cited by 15
“The potential clinical benefit of the lower doses to tissue surrounding the target volumes remains to be confirmed in clinical studies [9].”
BackgroundBenkhaled, S., Schiappacasse, L., Awde, A., & Kinj, R. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16061093 · Cited by 20
Cole, A., O’Hare, J., McMahon, S. J., McGarry, C. K., Butterworth, K. T., McAleese, J., Jain, S., Hounsell, A. R., Prise, K. M., Hanna, G. G., et al. (2013) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2013.11.024 · Cited by 17
Croke, J. M., Maclean, J., Nyiri, B. J., Li, Y., Malone, K., Avruch, L. I., Kayser, C., & Malone, S. C. (2014) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-014-0303-6 · Cited by 17
“Rectal DVH: 77% of CTV RTOG cases passed all RADICALS criteria and 37% all QUANTEC criteria; versus 73% and 40% for CTV MRI (p = 1.0 for both).”
MethodInfluentialNabavizadeh, N., Simeonova, A., Waller, J. G., Romer, J. L., Monaco, D., Elliott, D. A., Tanyi, J. A., Fuß, M., Thomas, C. R., & Holland, J. M. (2014) · Medical dosimetry · doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2014.04.001 · Cited by 17
“Individual isodose constraints were placed to ensure that the maximal tolerated doses to the OARs per published Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic guidelines were not exceeded.(17) The summated large-field and boost constraints used during planning included the following: the spinal cord Dmax…”
BackgroundInoue, T., Mimura, O., Masai, N., Ohashi, A., Ikenaga, K., Okuno, Y., NISHIGUCHI, I., & Oh, R. (2018) · International Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s10147-018-1284-5 · Cited by 17
“All patients were diagnosed * Toshihiko Inoue toinoue@r6.ucom.ne.jp 1 Ashiya Radiotherapy Clinic Nozomi, 3-84 Yoko-cho, Ashiya 659-0034, Japan 2 Department of Neuro-ophthalmological Therapeutics, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan 3 Miyakojima IGRT Clinic, Osaka, Japan with ONSM by an ophthalmologist (OM).”
BackgroundInfluentialExternal beam planning module of Eclipse for external beam radiation therapy
Saw, C. B., Li, S.-C., Battin, F., McKeague, J., & Peters, C. A. (2018) · Medical dosimetry · doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2018.03.003 · Cited by 17
Dose-guided patient positioning in proton radiotherapy using multicriteria-optimization
Kurz, C., Süss, P., Arnsmeyer, C., Haehnle, J., Teichert, K., Landry, G., Hofmaier, J., Exner, F., Hille, L., Kamp, F., et al. (2018) · Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik · doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.10.003 · Cited by 17
Goupy, F., Supiot, S., Pasquier, D., Latorzeff, I., Schick, U., Monpetit, E., Martinage, G., Hervé, C., Proust, B. L., Castelli, J., et al. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210514 · Cited by 17
“Vx: Dose–volume threshold recommendations (volume of organ receiving at least x Gy in %) according to the GETUG ( ̊) (21); RTOG (#) [22]; QUANTEC (&) [20] or Fiorino et al.”
MethodTing, D. S. J., Rana-Rahman, R., Ng, J. Y., Wilkinson, D., Ah-Kine, D., & Patel, T. (2020) · Ocular Oncology and Pathology · doi:10.1159/000511011 · Cited by 17
Ghemis, D. M., & Marcu, L. G. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103396 · Cited by 18
Luna‐Gutiérrez, M., Ocampo‐García, B., Jiménez‐Mancilla, N., Ancira-Cortez, A., Trujillo-Benítez, D., Hernández-Jiménez, T., Ramírez-Nava, G., Hernández-Ramírez, R., Santos‐Cuevas, C., & Ferro‐Flores, G. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14040720 · Cited by 17
Intramedullary Spinal Cord Lesions: A Single-Center Experience
Jecko, V., Roblot, P., Mongardi, L., Ollivier, M., Piccoli, N. D., Charleux, T., Wavasseur, T., Gimbert, É., Liguoro, D., Chotard, G., et al. (2022) · Neurospine · doi:10.14245/ns.2143190.595 · Cited by 17
Tanyi, J. A., Doss, E. J., Kato, C. M., Monaco, D., ZMeng, L., Chen, Y., Kubicky, C. D., Marquez, C., & Fuß, M. (2012) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr/79414773 · Cited by 17
Preliminary results of radiotherapy for primary intraocular non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Mikami, R., Nakayama, H., Gotô, H., Kimura, K., Usui, Y., Nogi, S., Tajima, Y., Okubo, M., Kanesaka, N., Sugahara, S., et al. (2013) · Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma · doi:10.3109/10428194.2013.769216 · Cited by 17
Zhu, J., Simon, A., Haigron, P., Lafond, C., Acosta, O., Shu, H., Castelli, J., Li, B., & de Crevoisier, R. (2016) · OncoTargets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/ott.s116508 · Cited by 17
Kil, W. J., Pham, T., Hossain, S., Casaigne, J., Jones, K. R., & Khalil, M. (2018) · Radiation Oncology Journal · doi:10.3857/roj.2018.00017 · Cited by 17
“, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and cigarette smoking) are also closely related with cardiac and pulmonary events, it has been emphasized to lower radiation dose to the heart and lung as low as reasonably achievable during radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer to reduce RT-related cardiac and pulmonary toxicities…”
BackgroundInfluentialYip, P. L., Mok, K. C. J., Ho, H., Lee, W. Y. V., Wong, A. C. L., Lau, C. T., Wong, F. C. S., Yeung, K. W. A., & Lee, S. F. (2021) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2021.10.013 · Cited by 16
Dennstädt, F., Medová, M., Putora, P. M., & Glatzer, M. (2022) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.039 · Cited by 16
“Whereas the latter ones are estimating complication probability under uniform irradiation, the mechanistic models ascribe the volume dependence of the so-called ‘serial’ or ‘parallel’ complications to radiotherapy-mediated disruption of the organ’s functional architecture 22 .”
BackgroundBalasubramanian, S., & Shobana, M. K. (2022) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.31557/apjcp.2022.23.12.4233 · Cited by 16
“OARs’ tolerance dose for producing 50% of complications (if irradiated uniformly) is TD50 (Marks et al., 2010; Niemierko et al., 1991) Table 1. summarises the parameters utilized for the calculations of Niemierko’s EUD model (Emami et al., 1991).”
BackgroundMethodFactors associated with acute esophagitis during radiation therapy for lung cancer
Herr, D. J., Yin, H., Bergsma, D. P., Dragovic, A. F., Matuszak, M. M., Grubb, M., Dominello, M. M., Movsas, B., Kestin, L. L., Boike, T. P., et al. (2024) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110349 · Cited by 16
“…Effects (QUANTEC) analysis summarized the available literature and recommended a mean esophagus dose (MED) 34 Gy for limiting the rate of grade 3 esophagitis to 5 – 20 %, as well as suggesting additional volumetric constraints for limiting the rate of grade 2 esophagitis to less than 30 %[13].”
MethodZhuo-cheng, L., Jian, C., Li, Y., Pan, Z., Yang, G., & Sun, X. (2024) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-024-12992-2 · Cited by 16
“The current guidelines for treatment planning in right-sided breast cancer suggest maintaining a mean liver dose (Dmean) within the range of 28–32 Gy to minimize the risk of radiation-induced liver injury [40].”
BackgroundKim, E. S., & Yeo, S. (2014) · Oncology Letters · doi:10.3892/ol.2014.2039 · Cited by 16
Hidéghety, K., Plangár, I., Mán, I., Fekete, G., Nagy, Z., Volford, G., Tőkés, T., Szabó, E. R., Szabó, Z., Brinyiczki, K., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Radiation Biology · doi:10.3109/09553002.2013.784424 · Cited by 16
Holloway, L. C., Miller, J.-A., Kumar, S., Whelan, B., & Vinod, S. K. (2012) · Medical dosimetry · doi:10.1016/j.meddos.2011.11.004 · Cited by 16
Han, D., Hao, S., Tao, C., Zhao, Q., Wei, Y., Song, Z., & Li, B. (2015) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.12262 · Cited by 16
A theoretical stochastic control framework for adapting radiotherapy to hypoxia
Saberian, F., Ghate, A., & Kim, M. (2016) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/61/19/7136 · Cited by 16
“The tolerance dose values for various normal tissues were similar to [3, 23, 33, 34] and are listed in Table 2 below.”
BackgroundCheraghi, S., Nikoofar, A., Bakhshandeh, M., Khoei, S., Farahani, S., Abdollahi, H., & Mahdavi, S. R. (2017) · International Journal of Radiation Biology · doi:10.1080/09553002.2017.1385872 · Cited by 16
“It has been suggested that the mean and prescribed dose to the cochlea should be limited to below 45Gy and 12–14Gy for conventionally fractionated and stereotactic radiosurgery, respectively (Marks et al. 2010).”
BackgroundSmyth, L. M. L., Day, L. R. J., Woodford, K., Rogers, P. A. W., Crosbie, J. C., & Senthi, S. (2019) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.019 · Cited by 16
Lee, W. H., Byun, H. K., Choi, J. S., Choi, G. H., Han, D. H., Joo, D. J., Kim, D. Y., Han, K.-H., & Seong, J. (2020) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.046 · Cited by 16
Held, T., Lang, K., Regnery, S., Weusthof, K., Hommertgen, A., Jäkel, C., Tonndorf‐Martini, E., Krisam, J., Plinkert, P. K., Zaoui, K., et al. (2020) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-020-01625-0 · Cited by 16
Mattes, M. D., Lee, J. C., Elnaiem, S., Guirguis, A., Ikoro, N. C., & Ashamalla, H. L. (2014) · Radiation Oncology Journal · doi:10.3857/roj.2014.32.1.23 · Cited by 16
“23 boost plans were chosen to be consistent with the clinical dose-volume constraints for a full course of prostate IMRT represented in the QUANTEC guidelines [21].”
MethodLiu, F., Yorke, E. D., Belderbos, J. S. A., Borst, G. R., Rosenzweig, K. E., Lebesque, J. V., & Jackson, A. (2012) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.024 · Cited by 16
Self-citationYavaş, G., Yavaş, Ç., & Acar, H. (2012) · Iranian Journal of radiation research/Iranian journal of radiation research · Cited by 16
Yang, J., Zhang, P., Zhang, L., Shu, H., Li, B., & Gui, Z. (2017) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.021 · Cited by 16
Sánchez-Nieto, B., Romero‐Expósito, M., Terrón, J. A., & Sánchez-Doblado, F. (2017) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.03.025 · Cited by 16
Dipasquale, G., Zilli, T., Fiorino, C., Rouzaud, M., & Miralbell, R. (2018) · Advances in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.adro.2018.06.001 · Cited by 16
Contemporary Radiation Treatment of Prostate Cancer in Africa: A Ghanaian Experience
Asamoah, F. A., Yarney, J., Awasthi, S., Vanderpuye, V. D. N. K., Venkat, P. S., Fink, A., Naghavi, A. O., Abrahams, A. O. D., Mensah, J. E., Sasu, E., et al. (2018) · Journal of Global Oncology · doi:10.1200/jgo.17.00234 · Cited by 16
“Multiple fields (four to six), wedges, and customized cerrobend blocks were used to optimize dose distribution to the planning target volume and to meet constraints for organs at risk using quantitative analysis of normal tissue effects in the clinic for the bladder, small bowel, rectum, and femoral heads.(11) All tre…”
MethodMallick, I., Arunsingh, M. A., Chakraborty, S., Arun, B., Prasath, S., Roy, P., Dabkara, D., Achari, R. B., Chatterjee, S., & Gupta, S. (2019) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2019.09.046 · Cited by 16
Chung, J.-H., Kang, S. Y., Wu, H.-G., Seo, Y. S., Kim, D., Kang, K. W., Kim, H. J., & Cheon, G. J. (2020) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2020.01.009 · Cited by 16
Rades, D., Seidl, D., Wollenberg, B., Schild, S. E., & Hakim, S. G. (2016) · Anticancer Research · doi:10.21873/anticanres.11126 · Cited by 15
Spatola, C., Privitera, G., Milazzotto, R., Tocco, A., Acquaviva, G., Marletta, F., Marino, L., Grazia, A. D., Salvo, R., Cartia, G., et al. (2019) · La radiologia medica · doi:10.1007/s11547-019-01007-x · Cited by 16
Grover, A., Soni, T. P., Patni, N., Singh, D. K., Jakhotia, N., Gupta, A. K., Sharma, L. M., Sharma, S., & Gothwal, R. S. (2021) · Radiation Oncology Journal · doi:10.3857/roj.2020.01018 · Cited by 15
“as per the Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) guidelines [10].”
MethodDeneuve, S., Bastogne, T., Duclos, M., Mirjolet, C., Bois, P., Bachmann, P., Nokovitch, L., Roux, P., Girodet, D., Poupart, M., et al. (2022) · Tumori Journal · doi:10.1177/03008916221078061 · Cited by 15
Mirandola, A., Russo, S., Bonora, M., Vischioni, B., Camarda, A. M., Ingargiola, R., Molinelli, S., Ronchi, S., Rossi, E., Vai, A., et al. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14112678 · Cited by 15
“The volume of optic nerves and chiasm receiving doses higher than 55 Gy(RBE) was also estimated, being related to the risk of radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION), as reported in QUANTEC series [14,18,29,30].”
BackgroundPark, Y. I., Choi, S. H., Hong, C., Cho, M. S., Son, J., Han, M. C., Kim, J., Kim, H., Kim, D. W., & Kim, J. S. (2022) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2022.07.001 · Cited by 15
Ajdari, A., Liao, Z. X., Mohan, R., Wei, X., & Bortfeld, T. R. (2022) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ac88b3 · Cited by 15
“Additionally, in linewith the accepted level of toxicity for grade 2RP, as reported in QUANTEC2013 (Marks et al 2010), an upper bound q = 20%was set for the RPNTCP constraint (2.12).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Marks, L. B., Yorke, E. D., Jackson, A., Ten Haken, R. K., Constine, L. S., Eisbruch, A., Bentzen, S. M., Nam, J., & Deasy, J. O.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marks, Lawrence B.
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- S10-S19
- ISSN
- 0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4041542
- OpenAlex
- W2046701188
- Cited by
- 1,826
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 92 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 125 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 164 · 2017: 122 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 56.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Lance Armstrong Foundation
- Armstrong Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (CA69579, R29CA069579, R29CA085181, R01CA069579, R01CA129182, R01CA085181, CA85181)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Keywords
- normal tissue complication probability, QUANTEC, normal tissue tolerance, NTCP models
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Humans, Models, Biological, Organ Specificity, Radiation Injuries, Radiation Tolerance, Models, Statistical, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Radiation Oncology, Dose Fractionation, Radiation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review