Cited by 204E-Government and Public ServicesTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services

Open access
Belanche, Daniel, Casaló, Luis V., Flavián, Carlos, Schepers, Jeroen·2014·Information & Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.im.2014.05.016

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 50 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The relationship between interpersonal recommendations and trust in the public e-service was nonsignificant.

    “The relationship between interpersonal recommendations and trust in the e-service was nonsignificant”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Recommendations from public administrations influence trust.

    “Trust was influenced by e-service quality and recommendations from public administrations and interpersonal sources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    e-Service quality influences trust.

    “Trust was influenced by e-service quality and recommendations from public administrations and interpersonal sources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Trust in the public e-service mediates the influence of both trust in the public administration and trust in the Internet on continuance intentions.

    “Our results show that trust in the public e-service mediates the influence of both trust in the public administration and trust in the Internet on continuance intentions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Recommendations made by public administrations influenced trust in the public e-service (b = 0.123, p < 0.01).

    “Also in support of H4a-c, our results showed that recommendations made by public administrations influenced formations of trust in public administrations (b = 0.092, p < 0.10), the public e-service (b = 0.123, p < 0.01), and the Internet (b = 0.142, p < 0.05).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 19
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Time consciousness moderates the effect of interpersonal recommendations on trust, such that the effect is negative for time-conscious users and positive for less time-conscious users.

    “we found a strong moderating influence of time consciousness”
    • Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
      “we find that time-conscious users experience a negative impact of interpersonal recommendations, but their effect is positive for people who are less concerned about time as a scarce resource.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Interpersonal recommendations influence trust.

    “Trust was influenced by e-service quality and recommendations from public administrations and interpersonal sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In rival model I, only trust in the public e-service yielded a significant effect on continuance intentions (b = 0.218, p < 0.01), whereas the other trust constructs did not relate significantly to the dependent variable.

    “With regard to the coefficients, only trust in the public e-service yielded a significant effect on continuance intentions (b = 0.218, p < 0.01), whereas the other trust constructs did not relate significantly to our dependent variable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Trust in the public e-service is created by interpersonal recommendations.

    “Feelings of trust also created by interpersonal and public administration recommendations, and e-service quality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Trust in the public e-service is created by e-service quality.

    “Feelings of trust also created by interpersonal and public administration recommendations, and e-service quality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Controlling for perceived usefulness and satisfaction, trust in the e-service has a significant positive effect on continuance intentions, almost on par with perceived usefulness.

    “Controlling for perceived usefulness and satisfaction, we find a significant, positive effect of trust in the e-service on users' continuance intentions, an influence almost on par with that of perceived usefulness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There are no direct effects of trust in the public administration or the Internet on continuance intentions.

    “With a rival model analysis, we also confirm the importance of the transfer process in optimizing continuance intentions, because we found no direct effects of trust in the public administration or the Internet on continuance intentions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Perceived usefulness and satisfaction constitute primary drivers of continuance intentions.

    “We also acknowledge that perceived usefulness and satisfaction constitute primary drivers of continuance intentions [14,99].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [14] 14. A. Bhattacherjee, Understanding information systems continuance: An expec- tation-confirmation model, MIS Quart. 25 (3), 2001, pp. 351-370. source
    • cites [99] 99. B. Vatanasombut, M. Igbaria, A. Stylianou, W. Rodgers, Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: The case of online banking, Inform. Manage. 45 (7), 2008, pp. 419-428. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Trust transfer occurs when a person develops trust in an entity because of her or his trust in a related entity.

    “It occurs when a person develops trust in an entity because of her or his trust in a related entity [90].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [90] 90. K. Stewart, Trust transfer on the world wide web, Org. Sci. 14 (1), 2003, pp. 5-17. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Trust is essential to maintaining ongoing relationships and countering uncertain situations.

    “Trust is essential to maintaining ongoing relationships and countering uncertain situations [9,64]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] 9. Y. Bart, V. Shankar, F. Sultan, G. Urban, Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study J. Market. 69 (4), 2005, pp. 133-152. source
    • cites [64] 64. D. McKnight, N. Chervany, What trust means in e-commerce customer relation- ships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology, Int. J. Electron. Comm. 6 (2), 2001, pp. 35-59. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The first version of the scales was developed from an extensive review of online trust literature, which helped ensure content validity.

    “We developed a first version of the scales on the basis of an extensive review of online trust literature, which helped ensure content validity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Accounting for perceived usefulness and satisfaction ensures that any significant effect of the three trust variables in the study is robust.

    “By accounting for these variables and their high explanatory power, we ensure that any significant effect of the three trust variables in our study is robust.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Trust can be assessed by beliefs or intentions.

    “Trust can be assessed by beliefs or intentions [63,70].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [63] 63. D. McKnight, L. Cummings, N. Chervany, Initial trust formation in new organi- zational relationships, Acad. Manage. Rev. 23 (3), 1998, pp. 473-490. source
    • cites [70] 70. C. Moorman, R. Deshpande ´, G. Zaltman, Factors affecting trust in market research relationships, J. Market. 57, 1993, pp. 81-101. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Trust in the public e-service fully mediates the relationship between trust in the public administration and continuance intentions, and between trust in the Internet and continuance intentions.

    “We therefore confirm a full mediating role of trust in the public e-service.”
    • Also stated in: § 8. Discussion · plain
      “we conclude in particular that trust in the public e-service mediates between trust in the public administration and continuance intentions, as well as between trust in the Internet and continuance intentions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    E-service quality and recommendations from public administrations and interpersonal sources are additional antecedents of trust.

    “Additional antecedents include e-service quality and recommendations from both public administrations and interpersonal sources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In modern society, time is an increasingly scarce resource, and many people believe that employing time efficiently is essential to improving their quality of life.

    “In modern society, time is an increasingly scarce resource, and many people believe that employing time efficiently is essential to improving their quality of life [28].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] 28. M. Dijst, M. Kwan, Accessibility and quality of life: time-geographic perspectives, in: K.P. Donaghy, S. Poppelreuter, G. Rudinger (Eds.), Social Dimensions of Sustainable Transport: Transatlantic Perspectives, Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, England, 2005, pp. 109-126.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The socio-demographic profile of the sample is similar to that of Spanish users of transactional e-government services and Spanish Internet users, with slight differences reflecting taxpayers (more middle-aged people, slightly more men).

    “In Table 2, we compare the socio-demographic profile of the sample with that of Spanish users of transactional e-government services [47] and Spanish Internet users [80]; we find similar patterns across the three samples, with some slight differences that represent the specific profile of taxpayers (higher representation of middle-aged people, slightly higher representation of men [1]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [47] 47. Instituto Nacional de Estadı ´stica. Encuesta sobre Equipamiento y Uso de Tec- nologı ´as de la Informacio ´n y Comunicacio ´n en los hogares 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=/t25/p450&file=inebase, 2011.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [80] 80. RED.ES, Perfil sociodemogra ´fico de los internautas: Ana ´lisis de datos INE 2008, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.ontsi.red.es/estudios-informes/109, 2009.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [1] 1. AEAT, Estadı ´stica de los declarantes del IRPF 2008: Agencia Estatal de la Admin- istracio ´n Tributaria, 2009.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Trust in an e-service reassures the user of the stable relationship with the service provider while also providing evidence that it is unlikely the system will break down or lose its value in the future.

    “trust in an e-service reassures the user of the stable relationship with the service provider while also providing evidence that it is unlikely the system will break down or lose its value in the future [99].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [99] 99. B. Vatanasombut, M. Igbaria, A. Stylianou, W. Rodgers, Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: The case of online banking, Inform. Manage. 45 (7), 2008, pp. 419-428. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Several sections of the survey adopted divergent layouts to prevent consistency motifs and meaningfully separate trust entities.

    “To prevent respondents from displaying consistency motifs in their answers and meaningfully separate the trust entities, several sections of the survey adopted divergent layouts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    Because independent entities simultaneously participate in public e-service provision, trust might be attributed to different referents.

    “Because independent entities simultaneously participate in public e-service provision, trust might be attributed to different referents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Trust constitutes an essential element of long-term relationships.

    “trust constitutes an essential element of longterm relationships [71]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [71] 71. R. Morgan, S. Hunt, The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing, J. Market. 58 (3), 1994, pp. 20-38. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Users could receive recommendations about public e-services from different sources, which may help them better assess the trustworthiness of different elements in the e-service system.

    “Most studies focus on a single recommending source at a time, such as interpersonal or consumer-to-consumer recommendations [55,102], but users could receive recommendations about public e-services from different sources, which may help them better assess the trustworthiness of different elements in the e-service system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The general conceptualization enables overcoming the difficulty of asking citizens to assess specific properties of impersonal entities, such as benevolence.

    “This general conceptualization enables us to overcome the difficulty of asking citizens to assess specific properties of impersonal entities, such as benevolence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Convergent validity was confirmed: all factor loadings were significant at 0.01 and exceeded 0.5, and AVE values were all greater than 0.5.

    “To test for convergent validity, we confirmed that all factor loadings were significant (at 0.01) and exceeded 0.5 [89].The average variance extracted (AVE) values were all greater than 0.5 (Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [89] 89. J. Steenkamp, I. Geyskens, How country characteristics affect the perceived value of Web sites, J. Market. 70 (3), 2006, pp. 136-150. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Perceived usefulness and satisfaction were included as control variables to increase the internal validity of the analysis.

    “Following previous literature, and to increase the internal validity of our analysis, we consider perceived usefulness and satisfaction as control variables that should affect continuance intentions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Intentions for continued usage relate to other psychological constructs, such as perceived usefulness and satisfaction.

    “Previous research shows that intentions for continued usage relate to other psychological constructs, such as perceived usefulness and satisfaction [14,99].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [14] 14. A. Bhattacherjee, Understanding information systems continuance: An expec- tation-confirmation model, MIS Quart. 25 (3), 2001, pp. 351-370. source
    • cites [99] 99. B. Vatanasombut, M. Igbaria, A. Stylianou, W. Rodgers, Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: The case of online banking, Inform. Manage. 45 (7), 2008, pp. 419-428. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Measures based on beliefs of overall trust were used, consistent with previous e-government studies.

    “Consistent with previous e-government studies, we used measures based on beliefs of overall trust [17,46].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [17] 17. L. Carter, F. Be ´langer, The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors, Inform. Syst. J. 15 (1), 2005, pp. 5-25. source
    • cites [46] 46. S.-Y. Hung, C.-M. Chang, T.-J. Yu, Determinants of user acceptance of the e- Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system, Govt. Inform. Quart. 23 (1), 2006, pp. 97-122. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    A four-dimensional, higher-order construct was considered in which each E-S-QUAL subdimension was a single-order factor.

    “Building on a dominant stream in e-service literature [24,31], we considered a fourdimensional, higher-order construct in which each E-S-QUAL subdimension was a single-order factor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [24] 24. E. Cristobal, C. Flavia ´n, M. Guinalı ´u, Perceived e-service quality (PeSQ): Mea- surement validation and effects on consumer satisfaction and web site loyalty, Manag. Serv. Qual. 17 (3), 2007, pp. 317-340. source
    • cites [31] 31. M. Fassnacht, I. Koese, Quality of electronic services, J. Serv. Res. 9 (1), 2006, pp. 19-37. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    E-service quality was assessed using the E-S-QUAL scale adapted to mitigate its focus on e-commerce, with three items for each of four dimensions.

    “To assess e-service quality, we used the E-S-QUAL scale [76], adapted to mitigate its focus on e-commerce.Thus we employed three items for each of the four dimensions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [76] 76. A. Parasuraman, V. Zeithaml, A. Malhotra, ES-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality, J. Service Res. 7 (3), 2005, pp. 213-233. source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The transmission of trust depends on the person's assessment of the entities' similarity, proximity, or belongingness to a trusted referent.

    “The transmission depends on the person's assessment of the entities' similarity, proximity, or belongingness to a trusted referent [40,90].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [40] 40. K. Grayson, D. Johnson, D.-F.R. Chen, Is firm trust essential in a trusted envi- ronment? How trust in the business context influence customers J. Market. Res. 45, 2008, pp. 241-256. source
    • cites [90] 90. K. Stewart, Trust transfer on the world wide web, Org. Sci. 14 (1), 2003, pp. 5-17. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Face validity of the adapted measures was tested using a variation of Zaichkowsky's method with a panel of 10 experts, retaining items with high consensus.

    “We tested the face validity of the adapted measures using a variation of Zaichkowsky's [105] method: We asked a panel of 10 experts to classify each item as ''clearly representative,'' ''somewhat representative,'' or ''not representative'' of the focal construct.We retained items that produced a high level of consensus among the experts [60].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [105] 105. J. Zaichkowsky, Measuring the involvement construct, J. Cons. Res. 12 (3), 1985, pp. 341-352. source
    • cites [60] 60. D. Lichtenstein, R. Netemeyer, S. Burton, Distinguishing coupon proneness from value consciousness: an acquisition-transaction utility theory perspective, J. Market. 54 (3), 1990, pp. 54-67. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Others' recommendations are less useful to shape beliefs for time-conscious people and may introduce a negative influence.

    “This makes others' recommendations less useful to shape beliefs and may apparently even introduce a negative influence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Hofstede's taxonomy, higher power distance cultures tend to obey governmental regulations and procedures.

    “In Hofstede's [44] taxonomy for example, higher power distance cultures tend to obey governmental regulations and procedures [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. C. Akkaya, P. Wolf, H. Krcmar, The Role of Trust in E-Government Adoption: A Literature Review. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2010, Lima, Peru, 2010.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Internet-savvy users do not automatically develop a high level of trust in a public e-service; they must trust public administrations before they will do so.

    “In line with previous findings in e-government [12], Internet-savvy users do not automatically develop a high level of trust in a public e-service; they must trust public administrations before they will do so.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. A. Beldad, T. Van der Geest, M. de Jong, M. Steehouder, Shall I tell you where I live and who I am? Factors influencing the behavioral intention to disclose personal data for online government transactions Int. J. Hum. Comp. Interact. 28 (3), 2012, pp. 163-177. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Cultural values and social norms guide people's beliefs and behaviors.

    “In addition, cultural values and social norms guide people's beliefs and behaviors [44], so people from different countries likely build trust perceptions differently [4].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] 44. G. Hofstede, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage Publications, Inc, London, 1980.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Spanish citizens may be more sensitive to public e-services' trust perceptions.

    “Thus, Spanish citizens may be more sensitive to public e-services' trust perceptions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People in cultures characterized by higher uncertainty avoidance are more concerned about risks and desire higher levels of trust.

    “However, people in cultures characterized by a higher uncertainty avoidance are more concerned about risks and desire higher levels of trust [4], and here, Spain's level of uncertainty avoidance is 22% higher than the world average [45].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. C. Akkaya, P. Wolf, H. Krcmar, The Role of Trust in E-Government Adoption: A Literature Review. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2010, Lima, Peru, 2010.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

37 of 37
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The sample of users had sufficient knowledge about the e-service to respond to all the survey questions.

    “The resulting sample of users had sufficient knowledge about the e-service to respond to all the survey questions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The sample of users of Spanish public e-services is comparable to online users in Europe.

    “Second, our analyses are based on a sample of users of Spanish public e-services, comparable to online users in Europe.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Public e-services are not a popular conversation topic.

    “Because public e-services are not a popular conversation topic, citizens who receive interpersonal recommendations may regard the endorsements as representative of a small or irrelevant user group.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Trust influences users' intentions to continue using e-services.

    “In modern society, where services have become increasingly electronic in nature, trust influences users' intentions to continue using e-services.”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Fulfillment scale has four listed items, not three

    Minor

    The methods say each e-service-quality dimension used three items, but the appendix lists four fulfillment items, FUL1 through FUL4.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 121 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jorgensen, 2002, Facing the challenges of e-government: A case study of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, SAM Adv. Manage. J., 67, 15
  2. Oliver, 1981, Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction process in retailer selling, J. Retail., 57, 25

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Schepers, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Schepers, Jeroen
Venue
Information & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
627-640
ISSN
0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978270621
Cited by
204
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
49.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information & Management (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (AP2007-03817)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
trust transfer, e-government services, continued usage, continuance intention, trust in public administration, online trust, e-service quality, time consciousness, e-government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review