Cited by 167Attachment and Relationship DynamicsInfant Health and DevelopmentPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Parental reflective functioning is associated with tolerance of infant distress but not general distress: evidence for a specific relationship using a simulated baby paradigm.

Open access
Rutherford, Helena J.V., Goldberg, Benjamin, Luyten, Patrick, Bridgett, David J., Mayes, Linda C.·2013·Infant Behavior and Development

Abstract

Parental reflective functioning represents the capacity of a parent to think about their own and their child's mental states and how these mental states may influence behavior. Here we examined whether this capacity as measured by the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire relates to tolerance of infant distress by asking mothers (N = 21) to soothe a life-like baby simulator (BSIM) that was inconsolable, crying for a fixed time period unless the mother chose to stop the interaction. Increasing maternal interest and curiosity in their child's mental states, a key feature of parental reflective functioning, was associated with longer persistence times with the BSIM. Importantly, on a non-parent distress tolerance task, parental reflective functioning was not related to persistence times. These findings suggest that parental reflective functioning may be related to tolerance of infant distress, but not distress tolerance more generally, and thus may reflect specificity to persistence behaviors in parenting contexts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.06.008

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the not-yet-published validation study (Luyten et al., 2009), the three-factor structure of the PRFQ was supported by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in two different samples for both mothers and fathers, and internal consistency was good for all subscales, ranging from 0.70 for pre-mentalizing modes to 0.82 for certainty in mental states.

    “Rutherford et al. (2013) reported that in the not yet published validation study (Luyten et al., 2009, Unpublished), the three-factor structure of the PRFQ was supported by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in two different samples for both mothers and fathers, and that internal consistency was good for all the subscales, ranging from 0.70 for pre-mentalizing modes to 0.82 for certainty”
  • PRFQ subscales were not correlated with demographic features, whereas they were associated with parental attachment, emotional availability, and parenting stress.

    “The subscales were not correlated with demographic features, whereas they were associated with parental attachment, emotional availability, and parenting stress.”
  • In Rutherford et al. (2013, 2015), parental reflective functioning evaluated by PRFQ was related to the mother's tolerance of infant distress.

    “Rutherford et al. (2013, 2015) found that parental reflective functioning evaluated by PRFQ was related to the mother’s tolerance of infant distress.”
  • In a subset of the pilot sample (N=15), heart rate and systolic blood pressure increased pre- to post-BSIM interaction, validating the distressing nature of the task.

    “We also found that in a subset of this sample (N=15) where physiological recording was possible, heart rate and systolic blood pressure increased pre- to post-BSIM interaction, validating the distressing nature of the task.”
  • In a small pilot study (Rutherford et al., 2013), mothers reporting higher levels of reflective functioning - specifically in respect of interest and curiosity in their own infant's mental states - persisted for longer in soothing the BSIM.

    “Our main finding was that mothers reporting higher levels of reflective functioning – specifically in respect of interest and curiosity in their own infant’s mental states – persisted for longer in soothing the BSIM.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rutherford, H. J. V., Goldberg, B., Luyten, P., Bridgett, D. J., & Mayes, L. C.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Rutherford, Helena J.V.
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
635-641
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027047600
Cited by
167
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Anna Freud Centre
  • NIDA P01 DA022446-05
  • NIDA R01 DA026437-02
  • NICHD R21 HD072574-01
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
parental reflective functioning, maternal mentalization
MeSH terms
Adult, Crying, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thinking, Parenting, Infant Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review