The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,850
Software Engineering Economics
Boehm, B. W. (2001) · Pioneers and Their Contributions to Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-48354-7_5 · Cited by 5,981
Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change
Beck, K. L., & Andres, C. (2000) · Cited by 5,902
Software Architecture in Practice
Bass, L., Clements, P., & Kazman, R. (1997) · Cited by 4,995
Kolodner, J. L. (2005) · The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816833.015 · Cited by 4,247
(1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,953
The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007) · SAGE · doi:10.4135/9781848607941 · Cited by 2,798 · cited 4×
“The coding of data in Grounded Theory occurs “in conjunction with analysis through a process of conceptual memoing, capturing the theorist’s ideation of the emerging theory” [77].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCockburn, A. (2001) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno · Cited by 1,858
Software Cost Estimation With Cocomo II
BOEHM, B. W., Abts, C., Brown, A. W., Chulani, S., Clark, B., Horowitz, E., Madachy, R. J., Reifer, D. J., & Steece, B. M. (2000) · Cited by 1,774
Software risk management: principles and practices
Boehm, B. W. (1991) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.62930 · Cited by 1,578
Albrecht, A. J., & Gaffney, J. E. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.1983.235271 · Cited by 1,558
Agile software development: the business of innovation
Highsmith, J., & Cockburn, A. (2001) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.947100 · Cited by 1,211
Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis
Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J. K., & Warsta, J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.08439 · Cited by 1,180
Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed
Boehm, B. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24675-6_1 · Cited by 1,173
Measuring application development productivity
Albrecht, A. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,119
Get ready for agile methods, with care
Boehm, B. (2002) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.976920 · Cited by 902
Software Metrics. A Rigorous Approach
(1991) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/0268396291006003-421 · Cited by 843
A General Empirical Solution to the Macro Software Sizing and Estimating Problem
Putnam, L. H. (1978) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.1978.231521 · Cited by 800
Software engineering economics: background, current practices, and future directions
Erdogmus, H., Boehm, B. W., Harrison, W., Reifer, D. J., & Sullivan, K. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Software engineering - ICSE '02 · doi:10.1145/581441.581444 · Cited by 711
A framework for identifying software project risks
Keil, M., Cule, P. E., Lyytinen, K., & Schmidt, R. C. (1998) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/287831.287843 · Cited by 698
Cross-project defect prediction: a large scale experiment on data vs. domain vs. process
Zimmermann, T., Nagappan, N., Gall, H. C., Giger, E., & Murphy, B. (2009) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-25785 · Cited by 694
Case-based reasoning: A review
Watson, I., & Marir, F. (1994) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888900007098 · Cited by 680
A Practical Guide to Feature-Driven Development
Palmer, S. R., & Felsing, M. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 652
An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management
Barki, H., Rivard, S., & Talbot, J. (2001) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2001.11045666 · Cited by 410
Customising agile methods to software practices at Intel Shannon
Fitzgerald, B., Hartnett, G., & Conboy, K. (2006) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000605 · Cited by 403
Components of software development risk: how to address them? A project manager survey
Ropponen, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.841112 · Cited by 393
Knigge, L., & Cope, M. (2006) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a37327 · Cited by 387
Asking Questions of the Data: Memo Writing in the Grounded Theory Tradition
Lempert, L. B. (2007) · The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory · doi:10.4135/9781848607941.n12 · Cited by 387
Lyytinen, K., Mathiassen, L., & Ropponen, J. (1998) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.9.3.233 · Cited by 354
Software project risks and their effect on outcomes
Wallace, L., & Keil, M. (2004) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/975817.975819 · Cited by 297
Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods
Truex, D., Baskerville, R., & Travis, J. (2000) · Accounting, Management and Information Technologies · doi:10.1016/s0959-8022(99)00009-0 · Cited by 279
Context in industrial software engineering research
Petersen, K., & Wohlin, C. (2009) · 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1109/esem.2009.5316010 · Cited by 270
What’s up with software metrics? – A preliminary mapping study
Kitchenham, B. (2010) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2009.06.041 · Cited by 253
Grounded theory: reflections on the emergence vs. forcing debate
Boychuk Duchscher, J. E., & Morgan, D. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03249.x · Cited by 241
Investigating software process in practice: A grounded theory perspective
Coleman, G., & O’Connor, R. (2008) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2007.07.027 · Cited by 202
Self-citationManaging the Sources of Uncertainty: Matching Process and Context in Software Development
MacCormack, A., & Verganti, R. (2003) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.2003004 · Cited by 195
The Social Nature of Agile Teams
Whitworth, E., & Biddle, R. (2007) · AGILE 2007 (AGILE 2007) · doi:10.1109/agile.2007.60 · Cited by 179
Grounded theories of management: a methodological review
Douglas, D. (2003) · Management Research News · doi:10.1108/01409170310783466 · Cited by 162
A systematic survey of CMM experience and results
Herbsleb, J. D., & Goldenson, D. R. (1996) · doi:10.5555/227726.227791 · Cited by 157
Successful Software Process Improvement
Grady, R. B. (1997) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 140
An empirical validation of a neural network model for software effort estimation
Park, H., & Baek, S. H. (2007) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.001 · Cited by 130
Performance Results of CMMI-Based Process Improvement
Gibson, D. L., Goldenson, D. R., & Kost, K. (2006) · doi:10.21236/ada454687 · Cited by 94
A systematic survey of CMM experience and results
Herbsleb, J., & Goldenson, D. R. (2002) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse.1996.493427 · Cited by 86
Software Process Tailoring: An Empirical Investigation
Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2007) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240211 · Cited by 72
Cross-project defect prediction: a large scale experiment on data vs. domain vs. process
Zimmermann, T., Nagappan, N., Gall, H. C., Giger, E., & Murphy, T. B. (2009) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/1595696.1595713 · Cited by 57
A study on agility and testing processes in software organizations
Kettunen, V., Kasurinen, J., Taipale, O., & Smolander, K. (2010) · International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis · doi:10.1145/1831708.1831737 · Cited by 56
Comparison of software development life cycles: a multiproject experiment
Benediktsson, O., Далчер, Д., & Thorbergsson, H. (2006) · IEE Proceedings - Software · doi:10.1049/ip-sen:20050061 · Cited by 51
How ISO 9001 fits into the software world
Coallier, F. (1994) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.251221 · Cited by 43
An ISO 9000 approach to building quality software
Oskarsson, Ö., & Glass, R. L. (1996) · Cited by 38
The effect of task order on the maintainability of object-oriented software
Wang, A. I., & Arisholm, E. (2008) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.03.005 · Cited by 18
Tailoring software development
Ferratt, T. W., & Mai, B. (2010) · doi:10.1145/1796900.1796963 · Cited by 9
Situational Factors Affecting Software Development Process Selection
Dede, B., & Lioufko, I. (2010) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) · Cited by 5
Cited by
Garousi, V., Felderer, M., & Mäntylä, M. V. (2016) · Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2915970.2916008 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Clarke, P., & O’Connor, R. V.
- Venue
- Information and Software Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 433-447
- ISSN
- 0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972888971
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 49.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
