Cited by 50Cognitive Abilities and TestingPsychometric Methodologies and TestingEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Two failures of Spearman's hypothesis: The GATB in Holland and the JAT in South Africa

Dolan, C·2004·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2003.09.001

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dolan, C.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Dolan, C
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
155-173
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139742568
Cited by
50
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
Spearman's hypothesis, general intelligence, GATB, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance, Netherlands, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review