Comparison of black-white differences on the WISC-R and the K-ABC: Spearman's hypothesis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An exploratory factor analysis of the Naglieri and Jensen (1987) data confirmed the larger factor loadings in Table 1.
“An exploratory factor analysis of these data confirmed the larger factor loadings in Table 1.”
From Investigating Spearman's Hypothesis by Means of Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2000) · cites this paper as Naglieri and Jensen (1987)
This large correlation was also observed in similar analysis of the Naglieri and Jensen (1987) data set.
“This large correlation was also observed in similar analysis of the Naglieri and Jensen (1987) data set.”
From Investigating Spearman's Hypothesis by Means of Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2000) · cites this paper as Naglieri and Jensen (1987)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200 · see citing works
Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability.
Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2005) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Flynn effect: A meta-analysis.
Trahan, L. H., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., & Hiscock, M. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037173 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Lubke, G. (2003) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0160-2896(03)00051-5 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Black Americans Reduce the Racial IQ Gap: Evidence From Standardization Samples
Dickens, W. T., & Flynn, J. R. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01802.x · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Investigating Spearman's Hypothesis by Means of Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Dolan, C. V. (2000) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3501_2 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Two failures of Spearman's hypothesis: The GATB in Holland and the JAT in South Africa
Dolan, C. (2004) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2003.09.001 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Equal opportunity and racial differences in IQ
Fagan, J. F., & Holland, C. R. (2002) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0160-2896(02)00080-6 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Testing Spearman's hypotheses using a bi-factor model with WAIS-IV/WMS-IV standardization data
Frisby, C. L., & Beaujean, A. A. (2015) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.007 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
A Meta-Analysis of Spearman’s Hypothesis in the United States
Woodley of Menie, M., Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M., & Sarraf, M. (2026) · Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities · doi:10.65550/001c.171909
- Authors
- Naglieri, J. A., & Jensen, A. R.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jensen, Arthur R.
- ORCID
- Naglieri, Jack A.
- Venue
- Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-43
- ISSN
- 0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081499121
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 12.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- black-white disparities, racial differences in intelligence, Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, WISC-R, Spearman's hypothesis, general intelligence, standardized test scores
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
