Cited by 92Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Interference control, working memory capacity, and cognitive abilities: a latent variable analysis.

Unsworth, Nash·2010·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2009.12.003

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dual tasking may require both WM capacity and IC mechanisms.

    “suggesting that dual tasking may require both WM capacity and IC mechanisms (Towse et al., 2000; Smith et al., 2001; Unsworth, 2010; Chein et al., 2011).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Unsworth, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Unsworth, N.
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
255-267
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983690991
Cited by
89
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
interference control, working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, memory performance, cognitive ability, mediation, latent constructs, executive function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review