Cited by 44Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsMathematics Education and PedagogyDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Cognitive strategy interventions improve word problem solving and working memory in children with math disabilities

Open access
Swanson, H. Lee·2015·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated the role of strategy instruction and working memory capacity (WMC) on problem solving solution accuracy in children with and without math disabilities (MD). Children in grade 3 (N = 204) with and without MD subdivided into high and low WMC were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 conditions: verbal strategies (e.g., underlining question sentence), visual strategies (e.g., correctly placing numbers in diagrams), verbal + visual strategies, and an untreated control. The dependent measures for training were problem solving accuracy and two working memory transfer measures (operation span and visual-spatial span). Three major findings emerged: (1) strategy instruction facilitated solution accuracy but the effects of strategy instruction were moderated by WMC, (2) some strategies yielded higher post-test scores than others, but these findings were qualified as to whether children were at risk for MD, and (3) strategy training on problem solving measures facilitated transfer to working memory measures. The main findings were that children with MD, but high WM spans, were more likely to benefit from strategy conditions on target and transfer measures than children with lower WMC. The results suggest that WMC moderates the influence of cognitive strategies on both the targeted and non-targeted measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01099

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adaptations of word problems may help ELLs successfully engage in mathematics word problems by making the content more accessible.

    “Adaptations of word problems may help ELLs successfully engage in mathematics word problems by making the content more accessible (Swanson, 2015).”

    From Guiding Preservice Teachers to Adapt Mathematics Word Problems Through Interactions with ELLs (2017) · cites this paper as Swanson, 2015

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that strategy instruction improved word-problem solution accuracy in children with math disabilities. The Methods describe diagrams and structured practice with word problems, but the paper does not study ELLs or show that adapting problems helps them by making content more accessible. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mathematical items can be linguistically adjusted to reduce the language load without altering the construct being assessed.

    “Research has shown that mathematical items can be linguistically adjusted to reduce the language load without altering the construct being assessed (Sato, 2008; Swanson, 2015; Swanson et al., 2013).”

    From Guiding Preservice Teachers to Adapt Mathematics Word Problems Through Interactions with ELLs (2017) · cites this paper as Swanson, 2015

    The Methods sections on pretest and posttest measures and covariates (page unavailable) describe math word-problem tests and account for reading proficiency, but do not describe linguistically adjusting test items. Searches for language load, linguistic adjustment, and preservation of the assessed construct found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pearson Publishers (2009). Scott Forsman-Addison Wesley EnVisionMath. New York, NY: Pearson, INC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swanson, H. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Swanson, H. Lee
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2015-08-04
Volume
6
Pages
1099-1099
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113799753
Cited by
44
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Department of Education (USDE R324A090002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
math disabilities, word problem solving, working memory capacity, cognitive strategy instruction, speech strategies, visual strategies, strategy transfer, operation span, third grade, solution accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review