Cited by 280Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adverse Events Following Cancer Immunotherapy: Obstacles and Opportunities

Open access

Abstract

Oncology has recently undergone a revolutionary change with widespread adoption of immunotherapy for many cancers. Immunotherapy using monoclonal antibodies against checkpoint molecules, including programmed death (PD)-1, PD ligand (PD-L)1, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4, is effective in a significant subset of patients. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have emerged as frequent complications of checkpoint blockade, likely due to the physiological role of checkpoint pathways in regulating adaptive immunity and preventing autoimmunity. As immunotherapy becomes more common, a better understanding of the etiology of irAEs and ways to limit these events is needed. At the same time, studying these new therapy-related disorders provides an opportunity to better understand naturally occurring human autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, with the potential to improve therapies for cancer and autoimmune diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.it.2019.04.002

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Pauken, K. E., Dougan, M., Rose, N. R., Lichtman, A. H., & Sharpe, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lichtman, Andrew H.
  • Sharpe, Arlene H.
Venue
Trends in Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
511-523
ISSN
1471-4906 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943668434
Cited by
280
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 15
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Immunology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • US National Institutes of Health Mentored Clinical Scientist Development Award (1K08DK114563-01)
  • American Gastroenterological Association Research Scholars Award (HL121363, HL13186)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 AI040614, P01 AI056299, AI108545)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
immune-related adverse events, cancer immunotherapy, immune checkpoint blockade, PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, monoclonal antibodies, autoimmunity, autoimmune disease therapy
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Animals, Disease Susceptibility, Humans, Immunotherapy, Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Autoimmunity, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Disease Management, Immunomodulation, Tumor Microenvironment, Patient Outcome Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review