Cited by 71Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Data-Driven Subtyping of Executive Function–Related Behavioral Problems in Children

Open access
Bathelt, Joe, Holmes, Joni, Astle, Duncan E., Holmes, Joni, Gathercole, Susan, Astle, Duncan, Manly, Tom, Kievit, Rogier·2018·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Executive functions (EF) are cognitive skills that are important for regulating behavior and for achieving goals. Executive function deficits are common in children who struggle in school and are associated with multiple neurodevelopmental disorders. However, there is also considerable heterogeneity across children, even within diagnostic categories. This study took a data-driven approach to identify distinct clusters of children with common profiles of EF-related difficulties, and then identified patterns of brain organization that distinguish these data-driven groups. METHOD: The sample consisted of 442 children identified by health and educational professionals as having difficulties in attention, learning, and/or memory. We applied community clustering, a data-driven clustering algorithm, to group children by similarities on a commonly used rating scale of EF-associated behavioral difficulties, the Conners 3 questionnaire. We then investigated whether the groups identified by the algorithm could be distinguished on white matter connectivity using a structural connectomics approach combined with partial least squares analysis. RESULTS: The data-driven clustering yielded 3 distinct groups of children with symptoms of one of the following: (1) elevated inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity, and poor EF; (2) learning problems; or (3) aggressive behavior and problems with peer relationships. These groups were associated with significant interindividual variation in white matter connectivity of the prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices. CONCLUSION: In sum, data-driven classification of EF-related behavioral difficulties identified stable groups of children, provided a good account of interindividual differences, and aligned closely with underlying neurobiological substrates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.01.014

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [17]Barabasi AL. Communities. In: Network Science. Cambridge, UK; 2016:321-377.
  2. [26]Conners C.K. Conners 3rd Edition Parent Short-Form 2013 Multi-Health Systems Inc North Tonawanda, NY
  3. [1]Rubinov M. Sporns O. Weight-conserving characterization of complex functional brain networks—Google search NeuroImage 56 2011 2068 2079 21459148
  4. [2]Bathelt J. Barnes J. Raymond F.L. Baker K. Astle D. Global and local connectivity differences converge with gene expression in a neurodevelopmental disorder of known genetic origin Cereb Cortex 27 2017 1 12 28168288 PMC6600876

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bathelt, J., Holmes, J., Astle, D. E., Holmes, J., Gathercole, S., Astle, D., Manly, T., & Kievit, R.
Affiliations
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Bathelt, Joe
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
252-262.e4
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2729782039
Cited by
71
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MC‐A0606‐5PQ41, MC-A0606-5PQ40, 5PQ40)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
executive function, children, data-driven clustering, white matter connectivity, structural connectomics, inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, learning difficulties, aggression, peer relationships, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, neurodevelopmental disorders, individual heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Problem Behavior, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Child, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review