Cited by 781Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

High-cost, high-capacity backbone for global brain communication

Open access
van den Heuvel, Martijn P., Kahn, René S., Goñi, Joaquín, Sporns, Olaf·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Network studies of human brain structural connectivity have identified a specific set of brain regions that are both highly connected and highly central. Recent analyses have shown that these putative hub regions are mutually and densely interconnected, forming a “rich club” within the human brain. Here we show that the set of pathways linking rich club regions forms a central high-cost, high-capacity backbone for global brain communication. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data of two sets of 40 healthy subjects were used to map structural brain networks. The contributions to network cost and communication capacity of global cortico-cortical connections were assessed through measures of their topology and spatial embedding. Rich club connections were found to be more costly than predicted by their density alone and accounted for 40% of the total communication cost. Furthermore, 69% of all minimally short paths between node pairs were found to travel through the rich club and a large proportion of these communication paths consisted of ordered sequences of edges (“path motifs”) that first fed into, then traversed, and finally exited the rich club, while passing through nodes of increasing and then decreasing degree. The prevalence of short paths that follow such ordered degree sequences suggests that neural communication might take advantage of strategies for dynamic routing of information between brain regions, with an important role for a highly central rich club. Taken together, our results show that rich club connections make an important contribution to interregional signal traffic, forming a central high-cost, high-capacity backbone for global brain communication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1203593109

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Richly connected subnetworks are metabolically expensive, consuming nearly 50% of cortical metabolism in humans.

    “but are also metabolically expensive, consuming nearly 50% of cortical metabolism in humans (Heuvel et al., 2012)”

    From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Heuvel et al., 2012

  • The dynamics of the default mode, salience and frontoparietal control networks form the computational core of a brain's dynamic internal working model of the body in the world, entraining sensory and motor systems to create multi-sensory representations of the world at various time scales from the perspective of someone who has a body, all in the service of allostasis.

    “My key hypothesis is that the dynamics of the default mode, salience and frontoparietal control networks form the computational core of a brain’s dynamic internal working model of the body in the world, entraining sensory and motor systems to create multi-sensory representations of the world at various time scales from the perspective of someone who has a body, all in the service of allostasis (”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van den Heuvel, M. P., Kahn, R. S., Goñi, J., & Sporns, O.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, 3905 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-06-18
Volume
109
Issue
28
Pages
11372-11377
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1990574575
Cited by
781
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 4
FWCI
27.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
rich club, structural brain connectivity, network cost, communication skills, hub regions, corticocortical connections, information routing, diffusion tensor imaging, brain network topology
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Communication, Humans, Models, Biological, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Models, Statistical, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review