Cited by 172Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Research Topics

Genetic effects on the variation and covariation of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional-defiant disorder/conduct disorder (ODD/CD) symptomatologies across informant and occasion of measurement

NADDER, T. S., RUTTER, M., SILBERG, J. L., MAES, H. H., EAVES, L. J.·2002·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background Previous studies have shown that the presence of conduct disorder may contribute to the persistence of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptomatology into adolescence; however, the aetiological relationship between the two phenotypes remains undetermined. Furthermore, studies utilizing multiple informants have indicated that teacher ratings of these phenotypes are more valid than maternal reports. Methods The genetic structure underlying the persistence of ADHD and oppositional-defiant disorder/conduct disorder (ODD/CD) symptomatologies as rated by mothers and teachers at two occasions of measurement was investigated on a sample of 494 male and 603 female same sex adolescent twin pairs participating in the Virginia Twin Study of Adolescent Behavioral Development (VTSABD). Results Using structural modelling techniques, one common genetic factor was shown to govern the covariation between the phenotypes across informants and occasion of measurement with additional genetic factors specific to ODD/CD symptomatology and persistence of symptomatology at reassessment. Genetic structures underlying the phenotypes were, to some extent, informant dependent. Conclusions The findings indicate that it is unlikely that the co-morbidity between ADHD and ODD/CD is due to environmental influences that are independent of ADHD. Rather it is likely to be due to a shared genetic liability either operating directly, or indirectly through gene-environment correlations or…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291701004792

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are no significant data on shared environmental effects for the covariation between ADHD, ODD, and CD.

    “with no signi fi cant data on shared environmental e ff ects”

    From ADHD, CD, and ODD: Systematic review of genetic and environmental risk factors (2018) · cites this paper as Nadder et al., 2002

  • The covariation between ADHD, ODD, and CD is mostly attributed to genetic influences.

    “The covariation between ADHD, ODD, and CD is mostly attributed to genetic in fl uences”

    From ADHD, CD, and ODD: Systematic review of genetic and environmental risk factors (2018) · cites this paper as Nadder, Rutter, Silberg, Maes, & Eaves, 2002

  • Existing literature is sufficiently consistent to conclude that comorbidity between CD, ODD, and ADHD may be primarily attributed to genetic influence and unique environment effects.

    “existing literature seems to be su ffi ciently consistent to conclude that it may be primarily attributed to genetic in fl uence (Dick et al., 2005; Martin et al., 2006; Nadder et al., 2002; Tuvblad et al., 2009) and unique environment e ff ects”

    From ADHD, CD, and ODD: Systematic review of genetic and environmental risk factors (2018) · cites this paper as Nadder et al., 2002

  • Comorbidity between ADHD, CD, and ODD may be based on a general syndrome of disruptive behavior that predisposes to any of the disorders.

    “The comorbidity between the three disorders may be based on a general syndrome of disruptive behavior that the children present and predispose to any of the disorders”

    From ADHD, CD, and ODD: Systematic review of genetic and environmental risk factors (2018) · cites this paper as Nadder et al., 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NADDER, T. S., RUTTER, M., SILBERG, J. L., MAES, H. H., & EAVES, L. J.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2002-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
39-53
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2021930047
Cited by
172
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH45268, MH-5557, R01MH045268)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, genetic susceptibility, comorbidities, informant differences, teacher ratings, maternal report, gene-environment correlation, sex differences, adolescent twins
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Diseases in Twins, Faculty, Humans, Male, Maternal Behavior, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic, Virginia, Observer Variation, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review