Cited by 16Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Do Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms Become Socially Isolated? Longitudinal Within-Person Associations in a Nationally Representative Cohort

Open access
Thompson, Katherine N., Agnew-Blais, Jessica C., Allegrini, Andrea G., Bryan, Bridget T., Danese, Andrea, Odgers, Candice L., Matthews, Timothy, Arseneault, Louise·2023·JAACAP Open

Abstract

Objective: This study examined longitudinal associations between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms and social isolation across childhood. The study tested the direction of this association across time, while accounting for preexisting characteristics, and assessed whether this association varied by ADHD presentation, informant, sex, and socioeconomic status. Method: Participants included 2,232 children from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study. ADHD symptoms and social isolation were measured at ages 5, 7, 10, and 12. Random-intercept cross-lagged panel models were used to assess the directionality of the association across childhood. Results: Children with increased ADHD symptoms were consistently at increased risk of becoming socially isolated later in childhood, over and above stable characteristics (β = .05-.08). These longitudinal associations were not bidirectional; isolated children were not at risk of worsening ADHD symptoms later on. Children with hyperactive ADHD presentation were more likely to become isolated, compared with inattentive presentation. This was evident in the school setting, as observed by teachers, but not by mothers at home. Conclusion: The study findings highlight the importance of enhancing peer social support and inclusion for children with ADHD, particularly in school settings. This study adds explanatory value beyond traditional longitudinal methods, as the results represent how individual children change over time, relative to their own preexisting characteristics. Diversity & Inclusion Statement: We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.02.001

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Parker J.G. Rubin K.H. Erath S.A. Wojslawowicz J.C. Buskirk A.A. Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective Cicchetti D. Cohen D.J. Developmental Psychopathology: Theory and Method Vol. 1, 2nd ed. 2006 Wiley Hoboken, NJ 419 493

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, K. N., Agnew-Blais, J. C., Allegrini, A. G., Bryan, B. T., Danese, A., Odgers, C. L., Matthews, T., & Arseneault, L.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Arseneault, Louise
Venue
JAACAP Open
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
12-23
ISSN
2949-7329 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321366377
Cited by
16
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAACAP Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD077482)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (863981)
  • European Research Council
  • King's College London
  • Medical Research Council (G1002190)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Colt Foundation
  • Jacobs Foundation
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, social isolation, peer relationships, inattentive presentation, school social support, teacher ratings, maternal ratings, sex differences, socioeconomic status, Environmental Risk Longitudinal Twin Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review