Cited by 822Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers

Open access
Healey, Jeff S., Baranchuk, Adrian, Crystal, Eugene, Morillo, Carlos A., Garfinkle, Michael, Yusuf, Salim, Connolly, Stuart J.·2005·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This study was designed to identify all randomized clinical trial data evaluating angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF), to estimate the magnitude of this effect and to identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit.Background Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure, vascular disease, and hypertension. Several reports suggest that they may also prevent the development of AF.Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all reports of the effect of ACEIs or ARBs on the development of AF. Eligible studies had to be randomized, controlled, parallel-design human trials of an ACEI or ARB that collected data on the development of AF.Results A total of 11 studies, which included 56,308 patients, were identified: 4 in heart failure, 3 in hypertension, 2 in patients following cardioversion for AF, and 2 in patients following myocardial infarction. Overall, ACEIs and ARBs reduced the relative risk of AF by 28% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15% to 40%, p = 0.0002). Reduction in AF was similar between the two classes of drugs (ACEI: 28%, p = 0.01; ARB: 29%, p = 0.00002) and was greatest in patients with heart failure (relative risk reduction [RRR] = 44%, p = 0.007). Overall, there was no significant reduction in AF in patients with hypertension (RRR = 12%, p = 0.4), although one trial found a significant 29% reduction in patients with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. In patients following cardioversion, there appears to be a large effect (48% RRR), but the confidence limits are wide (95% CI 21% to 65%).Conclusions Both ACEIs and ARBs appear to be effective in the prevention of AF. This benefit appears to be limited to patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction or LV hypertrophy. The use of these drugs following cardioversion appears promising but requires further study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.070

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Madrid AH, Bueno MG, Rebollo JMG, et al. Use of irbesartan to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2002;106:331-6.
  2. Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:2N-9N.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Healey, J. S., Baranchuk, A., Crystal, E., Morillo, C. A., Garfinkle, M., Yusuf, S., & Connolly, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Population Health Research Institute (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Healey, Jeff S.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
45
Issue
11
Pages
1832-1839
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111995867
Cited by
822
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 51
FWCI
12.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, atrial fibrillation prevention, heart failure, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular dysfunction, cardioversion, myocardial infarction
MeSH terms
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Atrial Fibrillation, Electric Countershock, Humans, Comorbidity, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review