Cited by 422Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesECG Monitoring and Analysis

Performance of a new leadless implantable cardiac monitor in detecting and quantifying atrial fibrillation - results of the XPECT trial

Hindricks, Gerhard, Pokushalov, Evgueny, Urban, Lubos, Taborsky, Milos, Kuck, Karl-Heinz, Lebedev, Dmitry, Rieger, Guido, Pürerfellner, Helmut·2010·Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current methods for detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) have limited diagnostic yield. Continuous monitoring with automatic arrhythmia detection and classification may improve detection of symptomatic and asymptomatic AF and subsequent patient treatment. The study purpose was to quantify the performance of the first implantable leadless cardiac monitor (ICM) with dedicated AF detection capabilities. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n=247) with an implanted ICM (Reveal XT, Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) who were likely to present with paroxysmal AF were selected. A special Holter device stored 46 hours of subcutaneously recorded ECG, ICM markers, and 2 surface ECG leads. The ICM automatic arrhythmia classification was compared with the core laboratory classification of the surface ECG. Of the 206 analyzable Holter recordings collected, 76 (37%) contained at least 1 episode of core laboratory classified AF. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for identifying patients with any AF were 96.1%, 85.4%, 79.3%, and 97.4%, respectively. The AF burden measured with the ICM was very well correlated with the reference value derived from the Holter (Pearson coefficient=0.97). The overall accuracy of the ICM for detecting AF was 98.5%. CONCLUSIONS: In this ICM validation study, the dedicated AF detection algorithm reliably detected the presence or absence of AF and the AF burden was accurately quantified. The ICM is a promising new diagnostic and monitoring tool for the clinician to treat AF patients independently of symptoms. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the clinical benefits of the technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circep.109.877852

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hindricks, G., Pokushalov, E., Urban, L., Taborsky, M., Kuck, K.-H., Lebedev, D., Rieger, G., & Pürerfellner, H.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (SK)
  • From the University of Leipzig-Heart Center (G.H.), Leipzig, Germany; State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology (E.P.), Novosibirsk, Russia; The National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (L.U.), Bratislava, Slovakia; the Department of Cardiology (M.T.), Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; the Department of Cardiology (K.-H.K.), Asklepios Klinik St Georg, Hamburg, Germany; Almazov Federal Center of the Heart, Blood, and Endocrinology (D.L.), St Petersburg, Russia; Medtronic (G.R....
Venue
Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Published
2010-04
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
141-147
ISSN
  • 1941-3084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3149
OpenAlex
W2144784619
Cited by
422
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 29
FWCI
21.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, implantable cardiac monitors, automatic arrhythmia detection, arrhythmia classification, Holter monitoring, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Electrodes, Implanted, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review