Cited by 301Dermatology and Skin DiseasesContact Dermatitis and AllergiesAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

Altered stratum corneum barrier and enhanced percutaneous immune responses in filaggrin-null mice

Kawasaki, Hiroshi, Nagao, Keisuke, Kubo, Akiharu, Hata, Tsuyoshi, Shimizu, Atsushi, Mizuno, Hideaki, Yamada, Taketo, Amagai, Masayuki·2012·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Loss-of-function mutations in filaggrin are major predisposing factors for atopic dermatitis. Although various reports suggest a critical role for filaggrin in stratum corneum (SC) barrier formation, the lack of filaggrin-null (Flg(-/-)) mice has hampered detailed in vivo analysis of filaggrin's functions. Objective We sought to generate Flg(-/-) mice and to assess the effect of filaggrin loss on SC barrier function and percutaneous immune responses. Methods We generated Flg(-/-) mice using gene targeting and assessed the morphology, hydration, mechanical strength, and antigen permeability of their SC. Percutaneous immune responses were evaluated through irritant- and hapten-induced contact hypersensitivity studies and by measuring humoral responses to epicutaneous sensitization with protein antigen. Results Newborn Flg(-/-) mice exhibited dry scaly skin. Despite marked decreases in natural moisturizing factor levels, which are filaggrin degradation products, SC hydration and transepidermal water loss were normal. Microscopic analyses suggested premature shedding of SC layers, and indeed, increased desquamation under mechanical stress was demonstrated. Loss of keratin patterns, which are critical for corneocyte stabilization, is likely attributable to fragility in the Flg(-/-) SC. Antigens penetrated the Flg(-/-) SC more efficiently, leading to enhanced responses in hapten-induced contact hypersensitivity and higher serum levels of anti-ovalbumin IgG(1) and IgE. Co…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.01.068

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawasaki, H., Nagao, K., Kubo, A., Hata, T., Shimizu, A., Mizuno, H., Yamada, T., & Amagai, M.
Affiliations
  • Keio University (JP)
  • RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
Corresponding author
Amagai, Masayuki
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
129
Issue
6
Pages
1538-1546.e6
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023782615
Cited by
301
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 9
FWCI
38.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23390086, 22249044, 21229014)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
filaggrin, stratum corneum barrier, atopic dermatitis, contact hypersensitivity, hapten sensitization, natural moisturizing factor, transepidermal water loss, desquamation, keratin, epicutaneous sensitization, skin hydration
MeSH terms
Filaggrin Proteins, Animals, Fluoresceins, Genotype, Intermediate Filament Proteins, Keratins, Permeability, Skin, Mice, Knockout, Blood-Aqueous Barrier, Epithelium, Corneal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review