Cited by 163Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchNeurological disorders and treatmentsTreatment of Major Depression

Safety and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in treatment-resistant depression. A systematic review

Daban, Claire, Martinez-Aran, Anabel, Cruz, Nuria, Vieta, Eduard·2008·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Objective The main objective of this review of the literature was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) by means of systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods A systematic review of the literature was made using the major databases (Medline, Psychological Abstracts, Current Contents), beginning in January 2000 and ending in September 2007. Ninety-eight references were found, but only 18 add-on studies met the required quality criteria and were included in this review. Only one double-blind, randomized study was available and therefore a meta-analysis was not feasible.Results In a majority of the preliminary open studies selected for this review, VNS was associated with a significant reduction of the depressive symptoms (primary outcome: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HDRS) in the short and long term. Unfortunately, the only double-blind study gave rather inconclusive results. Generally, VNS is reported to be a safe and feasible procedure, despite its invasive nature.Conclusions VNS seems to be an interesting new approach to treating TRD. However, despite the promising results reported mainly in open studies, further clinical trials are needed to confirm its efficacy in major depression. Moreover, studies on its mechanism of action and cost-effectiveness are also required to better understand and develop VNS therapy for affective disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2008.02.012

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daban, C., Martinez-Aran, A., Cruz, N., & Vieta, E.
Affiliations
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Vieta, Eduard
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
110
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-15
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019485942
Cited by
163
References
57
Citations by year
2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
vagus nerve stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, antidepressant efficacy, treatment safety, adjunctive therapy, depressive symptoms, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Vagus Nerve, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review