Cited by 22Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Long-term symptomatic and functional outcome following an intensive inpatient multidisciplinary intervention for treatment-resistant affective disorders

Wooderson, Sarah C., Fekadu, Abebaw, Markopoulou, Kalypso, Rane, Lena J., Poon, Lucia, Juruena, Mario F., Strawbridge, Rebecca, Cleare, Anthony J.·2014·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background The natural history of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is poor, with high rates of chronicity and recurrence. We describe longer-term symptomatic and functional outcome following multimodal intensive inpatient treatment for TRD. Methods Symptomatic and functional outcomes were assessed in 71 participants (unipolar, n=51; bipolar, n=20) with severe TRD previously treated at a specialist inpatient unit a median of 34 months (IQR 19-52) post discharge. We looked at outcomes in defined subgroups (unipolar, bipolar and psychotic) and at symptom clusters to see whether certain aspects of depression were more resistant to treatment than others. Results Symptomatic improvement during the admission was maintained at follow up: HDRS21 scores fell from admission (median 22; IQR 19-25) to discharge (median 12; IQR 7-16) and follow-up (median 10; IQR 4-18). Overall, two-thirds of patients were judged to have a good long-term outcome, while half remained in full remission at follow-up. Outcomes were more favourable in bipolar patients, patients without a history of psychosis and patients who were discharged in remission, although a minority of responders at discharge no longer met response criteria at follow up, and conversely some patients discharged as non-responders did subsequently respond. Non-remitting depression was characterised by three main factors; anxiety, cognitive difficulties and sleep disturbance. Those who remitted had better functional outcomes as did those who had experienced a more sustained response to treatment whilst inpatients. Quality of life was poor for those who did not respond to the treatment package. Limitations Variable follow-up length. Conclusions This difficult-to-treat population gained long-term benefits from multidisciplinary inpatient treatment. Treatment to remission was associated with more favourable outcomes. Non-responsive depression was characterised by specific symptom clusters that might be amenable to more targeted treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.013

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients can maintain clinical improvement 3 years (mean) post-discharge following intensive multidisciplinary TRD treatment.

    “The study showed that patients can maintain clinical improvement 3 years (mean) post-discharge following intensive multidisciplinary TRD treatment.”

    From Irremediability in psychiatric euthanasia: examining the objective standard (2023) · cites this paper as Wooderson et al., 2014

  • Wooderson et al. (2014) found that with intensive multidisciplinary treatment, 66% had a good outcome and 18-34% had poor to intermediate outcome at follow-up.

    “The fourth study found that, with intensive multidisciplinary treatment, 66% had a good outcome and 18–34% had poor to intermediate outcome at follow-up (median of 34 months) (Wooderson et al., 2014).”

    From Irremediability in psychiatric euthanasia: examining the objective standard (2023) · cites this paper as Wooderson et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wooderson, S. C., Fekadu, A., Markopoulou, K., Rane, L. J., Poon, L., Juruena, M. F., Strawbridge, R., & Cleare, A. J.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Cleare, Anthony J.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
166
Pages
334-342
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093912084
Cited by
22
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Affective Disorders
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
treatment-resistant depression, bipolar disorder, mood disorders, long-term outcomes, remission, functional outcome, symptom clusters, anxiety, cognitive difficulties, sleep disorders, quality of life, treatment response
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Treatment Outcome, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review