Cited by 165Treatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Remission and recurrence of depression in the maintenance era: long-term outcome in a Cambridge cohort

KENNEDY, N., ABBOTT, R., PAYKEL, E. S.·2003·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term studies of severe depression have described high rates of non-recovery, recurrence, chronic incapacity and mortality. A more recent cohort was followed-up to ascertain whether the course had improved given developments in pharmacological and psychological treatments in the last 15 years. METHOD: Subjects from a cohort of 70 mainly severe recurrent depressives originally recruited to a shorter follow-up study from 1990-1992 were followed-up after 8-11 years. Data included longitudinal information on course of depression and other psychiatric disorders, pharmacological and psychological treatment and social functioning during follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-nine (99%) subjects were successfully followed-up, with 61 of 66 living subjects interviewed and detailed follow-up data obtained in total on 65. Sixty (92%) of 65 subjects recovered during follow-up, with two-thirds subsequently suffering a recurrence. Eleven (17%) suffered from an episode of chronic depression of at least 2 years duration during follow-up. Social function at follow-up was good and there were high levels of pharmacological and psychological treatment. Greater severity of illness was the most consistent predictor of poor outcome. Times to recovery and recurrence and recovery and recurrence rates were very similar to older studies. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcome of depression still shows high recurrence rates and does not appear to have changed in the last 20 years.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s003329170300744x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In our study, family history of psychiatric illnesses was not associated with recurrence of MDD.

    “Results regarding family history and recurrence also have been inconsistent–a number of previous studies have reported that a family history of psychiatric illnesses was not associated with recurrence of MDD [11, 44, 64, 65], similar to what we have found in our study.”

    From Predictors of recurrence of major depressive disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [65]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KENNEDY, N., ABBOTT, R., & PAYKEL, E. S.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2003-06-26
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
827-838
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W1970615944
Cited by
165
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
severe depression, recurrent depression, remission, depression recurrence, chronic depression, long-term outcomes, course of depression, treatment outcomes, social functioning, disease severity, maintenance therapy, psychological intervention, pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review