Cited by 79Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness and adherence of telephone-administered psychotherapy for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Castro, Adoración, Gili, Margalida, Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio, Roca, Miquel, Gilbody, Simon, Perez-Ara, Maria Ángeles, Seguí, Andrea, McMillan, Dean·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of telephone-administered psychotherapy for depression in adults when compared to control conditions or other active treatments, and to determine adherence to telephone-administered psychotherapy.Methods A bibliographic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane library, and a number of sources of grey literature. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the impact of telephone-administered psychotherapy on depressive symptomatology. Two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted the relevant data, and assessed risk of bias using Cochrane tools. Random effects meta-analyses were used to determine the average effect of the interventions on depressive symptomatology: main analysis including randomised trials only, and several exploratory subgroup and sensitivity analyses.Results We identified ten trials. Telephone-administered psychotherapy showed beneficial effects on depression severity when compared to control conditions ((standardized mean difference [SMD]= -0.85 (95% CI -1.56 to -0.15)). When compared to active comparators, the meta-analysis showed a non-significant small effect size (SMD= -0.18 (95% CI -0.45 to 0.09)), in favour of telephone-administered psychotherapy. Total weighted mean adherence was 73%.Limitations Some of the included studies presented a small sample size. Due to variations in time points follow-ups among the studies, it was not possible to determine long term post intervention effects.Conclusions Available evidence suggests that telephone-delivered psychotherapy may be an effective strategy to reduce depression symptoms when compared to control conditions, and shows an adequate treatment adherence. Future research is needed to determine its cost-effectiveness and long-term effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2019.09.023

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Telephone-delivered psychotherapy for depression has comparative effectiveness to face-to-face treatment.

    “A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of telephone delivered psychotherapy for depression highlighted adequate treatment adherence, beneficial effects when compared with usual care, and comparative effectiveness to face-to-face treatment [13].”

    From 'I didn't know what to expect': Exploring patient perspectives to identify targets for change to improve telephone-delivered psychological interventions (2020) · cites this paper as [13]

    Section 3.5.2 reports no statistically significant difference between telephone psychotherapy and a pooled group of active comparators, four of which were face-to-face interventions. The Implications section says there is no evidence that telephone treatment is less effective than active comparators, but the Discussion cautions that these comparisons are less conclusive; the review does not establish equivalent effectiveness specifically to face-to-face treatment. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence for clinical effectiveness and acceptability of the telephone as a mode of treatment has been established, but challenges remain around uptake and engagement.

    “The evidence for clinical effectiveness and acceptability of the telephone as a mode of treatment has been established [13, 30]; challenges, however, remain around uptake and engagement.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Higgings, P. T., Green S., (Eds.), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Accessed March 6, 2018 from: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  2. Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S. (Eds.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Accessed July 24 2019 from: www.cochrane-handbook.org.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castro, A., Gili, M., Ricci-Cabello, I., Roca, M., Gilbody, S., Perez-Ara, M. Á., Seguí, A., & McMillan, D.
Affiliations
  • Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (ES)
  • Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud (ES)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES)
Corresponding author
Castro, Adoración
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
260
Pages
514-526
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971782318
Cited by
78
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Docusalut (Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Universitat de les Illes Balears
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
depression, medication adherence, depression severity, treatment effectiveness, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Humans, Psychotherapy, Telephone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review