Cited by 56Treatment of Major DepressionDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effects of combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for improving work functioning in major depressive disorder

Open access
Lam, Raymond W., Parikh, Sagar V., Ramasubbu, Rajamannar, Michalak, Erin E., Tam, Edwin M., Axler, Auby, Yatham, Lakshmi N., Kennedy, Sidney H. +1 more·2013·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder is associated with significant impairment in occupational functioning and reduced productivity, which represents a large part of the overall burden of depression. Aims: To examine symptom-based and work functioning outcomes with combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy treatment of major depressive disorder. Method: Employed patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder were treated with escitalopram 10–20mg/day and randomised to: (a) telephone-administered cognitive-behavioural therapy (telephone CBT) (n = 48); or (b) adherence-reminder telephone calls (n = 51). Outcomes included the Montgomery-åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), administered by masked evaluators via telephone, and self-rated work functioning scales completed online. (Registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00702598.) Results: After 12 weeks, there were no significant between-group differences in change in MADRS score or in response/remission rates. However, participants in the telephone-CBT group had significantly greater improvement on some measures of work functioning than the escitalopram-alone group. Conclusions: Combined treatment with escitalopram and telephone- administered CBT significantly improved some self-reported work functioning outcomes, but not symptom-based outcomes, compared with escitalopram alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.125237

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of trials have demonstrated the efficacy of an 8-session CBT intervention.

    “A number of trials have demonstrated the efficacy of an 8-session CBT intervention.79,80”

    From Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder (2016) · cites this paper as [80]

    The CBT condition and Method sections describe an eight-session telephone CBT intervention, and the Work functioning outcomes section reports greater improvement than escitalopram alone on some productivity measures. But this paper reports one trial, not a number of trials, and its Clinical outcomes section found no significant additional benefit for depressive symptoms. It therefore supports a narrower efficacy claim than the citing sentence makes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The same 8-session CBT phone intervention added to an antidepressant improved work performance and satisfaction compared to antidepressant alone.

    “The same 8-session CBT phone intervention added to an antidepressant improved work performance and satisfaction compared to antidepressant alone.80”

    From Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder (2016) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Method and CBT condition describe eight telephone CBT sessions added to escitalopram. Work functioning outcomes report greater improvement in self-rated performance for the CBT group than for the escitalopram-alone group. The Acceptability of telephone CBT section reports satisfaction with the therapy only among CBT participants; it does not show that satisfaction improved compared with the control group. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lam, R. W., Parikh, S. V., Ramasubbu, R., Michalak, E. E., Tam, E. M., Axler, A., Yatham, L. N., Kennedy, S. H., & Manjunath, C. V.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia Hospital (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2013-11
Volume
203
Issue
5
Pages
358-365
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2160302903
Cited by
56
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Servier
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Lundbeck Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
major depressive disorder, work functioning, occupational functioning, escitalopram, combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, symptom remission, employed patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Citalopram, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Telemedicine, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Young Adult, Intention to Treat Analysis, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review