The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 48 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background Acute effects of COVID-19 can be life-threatening. Alterations in mental health during the active infection have been documented, but the long-term consequences are less clear. Method A systematic review was undertaken to investigate the effect of COVID-19 infection on long-term mental health outcomes. Three databases [PubMed, Medline (Ovid) and Cochrane library] were searched between 1st October 2019 and 29th August 2021 with additional hand searching to identify all published studies reporting symptoms of generalised anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or sleep disturbance in participants at least one month after COVID-19 infection. The prevalence and mean symptom score of each were assessed. Results Eight hundred and eighty five studies were found, of which 33 were included in the review involving a total of 6743 participants. The studies’ risk of bias were typically fair quality. The median study age of participants was 57.8 years (IQR 49.3–60.7), with 63.0% male (IQR 57.0%–73.0%). Participants typically experienced no or mild symptoms of long-term anxiety (GAD-7, STAI-S, HADS) and depression (PHQ-9, BDI, PHQ-2, HADS). Prevalence varied depending on the measurement tool. Sleep disturbances (primarily insomnia) were most commonly reported as mild. PTSD prevalence was similar to anxiety and depression. Conclusion The overall effect of the pandemic has been linked with worsening psychiatric symptoms. However, the long-term effect from direct COVID-19 infection has been associated with no or mild symptoms. Studies exhibited the long-term prevalence of anxiety, depression, PTSD, and sleep disturbances to be comparable to general population levels.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 48 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants typically experienced no or mild symptoms of long-term anxiety (GAD-7, STAI-S, HADS) and depression (PHQ-9, BDI, PHQ-2, HADS).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“The included participants typically exhibited no worse than mild symptoms of anxiety and depression.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Abstract > Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cohorts followed up for more than three months had half the prevalence of depression compared to those that were followed up for less than three months, reporting a prevalence of 10.36% and 20.84% respectively.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One study reported no anxiety with an average score of 1.88 (95% CI = 0.68, 3.08; (Kang et al., 2021)”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Primary outcome
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This included 3431 patients 17.52% of whom were experiencing at least mildly severe anxiety symptoms.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Primary outcome
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Depression prevalence in severe COVID-19 cases was 20.39% out of 309 patients, averaging none to mild symptoms of depression.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 309Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“An average MOS-SS score of 20.58 (95% CI = 19.95, 21.21) was reported representing mild symptoms of sleep disturbance (Mazza et al., 2020).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Two studies used the ISI with an overall insomnia prevalence of 34.64% (Li et al., 2021, Morin et al., 2021).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The prevalence of PTSD in severe cases of COVID-19 was 19% from 200 patients.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 200Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prevalence varied depending on the measurement tool.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Abstract > Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PTSD prevalence in cohorts followed up longer than three months was slightly higher than less than three months follow-up at 18.99% and 12.19% respectively (Supplement 8).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, there was inconsistency findings in anxiety prevalence between different diagnostic tools.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Guo et al. (2020) and Hasan et al., 2021 reported an average mild depression severity, with a mean PHQ-9 score of 5.00 (95% CI = 4.71, 5.29) and 5.64 (95% CI = 4.98, 6.30).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Taquet et al. (2021) reported a prevalence of anxiety disorder of 7.11% (95% CI = 6.82, 7.41).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Primary outcome
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Taquet et al. (2021) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The two BDI studies, Mazza et al. (2021) and Ortelli et al. (2021) reported minimal depression, with average scores of 1.93 (95% CI = 1.34, 2.52) and 3.80 (95% CI = 2.16, 5.44) respectively.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sensitivity analysis showed a decrease in prevalence from 20.68% to 11.11% between one to three months follow-up and more than three months follow-up (Supplement 8).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Finally, the sensitivity analysis revealed a decrease in anxiety with follow-up greater than three months.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Primary outcome
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The overall prevalence of positive PTSD screen was 17.68% of 3405 participants.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 3,405Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“only two HADS studies reported mean scores, both indicating minimal depression with scores of 3.81 (95% CI = 3.227, 4.35) for Noviello et al., 2021 and 6.3 (95% CI = 5.79, 6.81) for Poyraz et al., (2021).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PTSD prevalence was similar to anxiety and depression.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Abstract > Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All studies examined an adult sample from treatment centres or hospitals.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Study selection and characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The outcomes were assessed approximately one to six months after infection (see Supplement 4).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Study selection and characteristics
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An overall prevalence of sleep disturbances of 36.59% of 1454 participants was obtained.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 1,454Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similar to anxiety, depression mean scores for each study indicated levels from none to mild.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Three studies used the PSQI with an overall prevalence of 41.97% (Poyraz et al., 2021, Tanriverdi et al., 2021, Wong et al., 2020).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sleep disturbances (primarily insomnia) were most commonly reported as mild.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Abstract > Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The only study using the STAI-S identified minor symptoms of anxiety with Mendez et al., 2021 reporting 33.66 (95% CI = 31.88, 35.44)”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Primary outcome
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Patients with a positive psychiatric history were more likely to display higher symptoms scores of depression, anxiety, and PTSD.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Study selection and characteristics
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is important to note that there was heterogeneity related to the severity of COVID-19 within and between studies.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Study selection and characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Anxiety prevalence in severe COVID-19 cases was 19.03% of 309 patients that were experiencing at least mild anxiety symptoms”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Primary outcome
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 309Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From a total of 4935 participants, 18.85% exhibited at least mild symptoms of depression (Supplement 7).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 4,935Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“two HADS studies (Noviello et al., 2021, Poyraz et al., 2021) reported minimal anxiety with overall scores of 4.68 (95% CI = 4.07, 5.29) and 6.2 (95% CI = 5.65, 6.75) respectively.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Primary outcome
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Two studies using GAD-7 (Guo et al., 2020, Hasan et al., 2021) reported on average mild anxiety with a mean score of 5.00 (95% CI = 4.14, 5.86) and 5.79 (95% CI = 5.16, 6.42).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Primary outcome
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The prevalence of insomnia reported using the ISI was lower than that in patients with acute COVID-19, and comparable to the general population during the early stages of the pandemic in China, when measured using the same instrument (Deng et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2020).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Deng et al., 2020
- Not checked yetcites Yu et al., 2020
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Taquet et al. (2021) reported a low prevalence of mood disorders, with other studies stating that long-term anxiety and depression in COVID-19 patients are similar to pre-pandemic levels (Klaser et al., 2021).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Taquet et al., 2021 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, the sensitivity analysis revealed a decrease in PTSD prevalence with longer follow-up.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“PSQI prevalence was also comparable to that in the general population during the outbreak determined using the same tool (Jahrami et al., 2021).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jahrami et al., 2021 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sensitivity analysis showed a halving of depression prevalence in studies with a longer follow-up.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, although sleep disturbance prevalence is higher than the other outcomes, this is not pertaining to disorders and does not appear substantially different from general population estimates.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As for PTSD, overall PCL-5 and TSQ scores were lower compared to DTS and IES-R scores.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The PCL-5, TSQ, DTS, and IES-R instruments provide comparable measures of PTSD.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The pooled prevalence was also lower compared to rates reported in the MERS (Park et al., 2020a) and SARS epidemics (Mak et al., 2009).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Park et al., 2020a
- Not checked yetcites Mak et al., 2009 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The PCL-5, TSQ, DTS, and IES-R instruments provide comparable measures of PTSD.
In the paper
“In the case of sleep disturbances, evidence of minor levels of sleep disturbances was presented by Mazza et al. (2020).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mazza et al., 2020 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“When pooled, the combined prevalence of all studies reporting depression was no higher than would be expected in the general public during the COVID-19 pandemic (Salari et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; Krishnamoorthy et al., 2020).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Salari et al., 2020
- Not checked yetcites Zhang et al., 2020
- Not checked yetcites Krishnamoorthy et al., 2020 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most studies reported anxiety, depression and sleep disturbances in the short term following COVID-19.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The prevalence of insomnia reported using the ISI was lower than that in patients with acute COVID-19, and comparable to the general population during the early stages of the pandemic in China, when measured using the same instrument (Deng et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2020).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Taquet et al. (2021) reported a low prevalence of mood disorders, with other studies stating that long-term anxiety and depression in COVID-19 patients are similar to pre-pandemic levels (Klaser et al., 2021).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Klaser et al., 2021 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesWhat the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The studies’ risk of bias were typically fair quality.”
- Also stated in: § Quality assessment · plain
“The risk of bias, assessed using the NOS, indicated seven studies were rated as good quality, eighteen rated as fair quality, and eight rated as poor quality (Supplement 3).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Abstract > Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Quality assessment · plain
In the paper
“These have demonstrated sustained long-term psychiatric illness in people who have recovered from the acute infection (Park et al., 2020a).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Park et al., 2020a
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“As with anxiety, the clinical interview implemented by Xiong et al. (2021) yielded a much lower depression prevalence compared to the questionnaires.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Xiong et al. (2021) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Studies with up to 12-year follow-up have shown sustained mental health effects including anxiety, depression, trauma, and sleep disturbance (Tzeng et al., 2020).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tzeng et al., 2020 source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the long-term effect from direct COVID-19 infection has been associated with no or mild symptoms.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Abstract > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Mental health symptoms measured at follow-up are attributable to direct COVID-19 infection rather than to indirect pandemic effects.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, the evidence presented does not suggest any increase in anxiety after COVID-19 infection.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: Mental health symptoms measured at follow-up are attributable to direct COVID-19 infection rather than to indirect pandemic effects.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“All except PHQ-9 and HRSD reported lower than expected prevalence compared to other studies that examined the general population and healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic using a mild disease severity threshold (Salari et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; Krishnamoorthy et al., 2020).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Salari et al., 2020
- Not checked yetcites Zhang et al., 2020
- Not checked yetcites Krishnamoorthy et al., 2020 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“However, one year on from the (Rogers et al., 2020)systematic review of May 2020, the predicted mild trajectory of psychiatric illness would seem to have been borne out.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rogers et al., 2020 source
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This was also found within Klaser et al. (2021) who recruited a large cohort of SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals and found a slightly higher prevalence of anxiety and depression disorders at three months compared to pre-pandemic levels.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Klaser et al. (2021) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The PHQ-9 prevalence percentages may be over-sensitive in the included studies due to the low cut-off scores employed (Hasan et al., 2021).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hasan et al., 2021
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Compared to clinical diagnoses reported by Taquet et al. (2021), self-reported anxiety prevalence was significantly higher, further indicating the disparities between clinical diagnosis and patient-reported screening questionnaires.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Taquet et al. (2021) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Anxiety findings (mean GAD-7, STAI-S and HADS scores) were comparable to the general population.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: General-population mental health levels during the pandemic provide a valid benchmark for long-term mental health after COVID-19 infection.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is possible that indirect psychosocial factors may be the overriding mechanism for any increased level of anxiety and depression(Brooks et al., 2020, Yu et al., 2020).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brooks et al., 2020 source
- Not checked yetcites Yu et al., 2020
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In addition, psychological, social, and job-related factors have also been shown to be associated with poor mental health outcomes (Vindegaard and Benros, 2020).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vindegaard and Benros, 2020 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While this is not a fair comparison due to the different follow-up timeframes, the low prevalence does not support an association between COVID-19 and long-term PTSD.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The PCL-5, TSQ, DTS, and IES-R instruments provide comparable measures of PTSD.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From the results of our study, current data seem to indicate limited association between long-term follow-up after COVID-19 infection and psychiatric disorders.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These have been linked to mood disorders (Dantzer, 2018; Miller and Raison, 2016) and sleep disturbances (Cespuglio et al., 2021) providing some indications of neurological mechanisms through which viral infection may have causal effects on psychiatric disorder onset.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The appearance of some mental health symptoms following COVID-19 may be resultant of infection.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, symptoms at longer term were consistent with the general population suggesting deterioration could be attributed to indirect effects of COVID-19 psychosocial factors.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion > Conclusion
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This renders the mechanism for psychiatric effects complex and not easily disentangled with these included studies.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These have been linked to mood disorders (Dantzer, 2018; Miller and Raison, 2016) and sleep disturbances (Cespuglio et al., 2021) providing some indications of neurological mechanisms through which viral infection may have causal effects on psychiatric disorder onset.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dantzer, 2018
- Not checked yetcites Miller and Raison, 2016 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, although sleep disturbance prevalence is higher than the other outcomes, this is not pertaining to disorders and does not appear substantially different from general population estimates.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“These have been linked to mood disorders (Dantzer, 2018; Miller and Raison, 2016) and sleep disturbances (Cespuglio et al., 2021) providing some indications of neurological mechanisms through which viral infection may have causal effects on psychiatric disorder onset.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cespuglio et al., 2021 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesWhat the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only seven of thirty-three studies were rated as good in the RoB assessment.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion > Strengths and limitations
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This suggests that the global increase in mental health sequelae reported by Santomauro et al. (2021) is more likely due to psychosocial factors rather than a direct long-term effect of the virus.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Santomauro et al., 2021 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, symptoms at longer term were consistent with the general population suggesting deterioration could be attributed to indirect effects of COVID-19 psychosocial factors.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Once in the brain, the virus can trigger an immune response resulting in the secretion of interleukins, tumour necrosis factor and nitric oxide (Cespuglio et al., 2021).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cespuglio et al., 2021 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“External environmental factors such as quarantine and lockdown measures introduced during the onset of the pandemic have been shown to act as risk factors for psychiatric disorders.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brooks et al., 2020 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Studies of previous coronaviruses (Netland et al., 2008), animal models (Burks et al., 2021), and brain analysis at post-mortem of COVID-19 patients (Paniz-Mondolfi et al., 2020) provide evidence that SARS-CoV-2 can penetrate the blood-brain barrier.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“This confirms results from Mazza et al. (2021) where PTSD reported using PCL-5 decreased with longer follow-up in COVID-19 patients.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mazza et al., 2021 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, although sleep disturbance prevalence is higher than the other outcomes, this is not pertaining to disorders and does not appear substantially different from general population estimates.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 17
- Probably not a substantial claim. 12
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Eight hundred and eighty five studies were found, of which 33 were included in the review involving a total of 6743 participants.”
- Also stated in: § Study selection and characteristics · plain
“The search resulted in a total of 885 articles (Fig. 1 - PRISMA flow chart). After title, abstract and full text screening, thirty-three studies were included”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Abstract > Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 6,743Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Study selection and characteristics · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The median study age of participants was 57.8 years (IQR 49.3–60.7), with 63.0% male (IQR 57.0%–73.0%).”
- Also stated in: § Study selection and characteristics · plain
“The median study age of patients was 57.8 years old (interquartile range [IQR] 49.3 to 60.7 years old) and the median study proportion of male participants was 63.0% male (IQR 57.0% to 73.0%).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Abstract > Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 6,743Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Study selection and characteristics · plain
In the paper
“Finally, D'Cruz et al. (2021) reported a prevalence of 57%, however, since a validated tool was not used, this was excluded from the statistical summary.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites D'Cruz et al. (2021)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the prevalence of sleep quality disturbance was 40% out of 30 cases, with most participants indicating no poor sleep.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 30Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nine studies excluded patients with a history of psychiatric disorders (Albu et al., 2021, Guo et al., 2020, Mazza, 2021, Mazza et al., 2020, Mendez et al., 2021, Negrini et al., 2020, Ortelli et al., 2021, Taquet et al., 2021, van den Borst et al., 2021) , with the other seventeen studies not specifying.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Study selection and characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 9Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Kang et al. (2021) and Wong et al. (2020) reported no depression overall, with average scores of 2.75 (95% CI = 1.21, 4.29) and 5.31 (95% CI = 4.23, 6.38).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Secondary outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seven studies included participants with a lifetime psychiatric history (de Graaf et al., 2021, Horn et al., 2020, Kang et al., 2021, Park et al., 2020b, Poyraz et al., 2021, Tarsitani et al., 2021) with a prevalence of 40%, 13.9%, 30%, 15.4%, 10% and 8% respectively, and (Noviello et al., 2021) included 4.8% and 1.3% patients with anxiety and depression history respectively.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Results > Study selection and characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 7Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies exhibited the long-term prevalence of anxiety, depression, PTSD, and sleep disturbances to be comparable to general population levels.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Abstract > Conclusion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: General-population mental health levels during the pandemic provide a valid benchmark for long-term mental health after COVID-19 infection.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Past epidemics caused by SARS, MERS, or ebola have demonstrated that half of the survivors suffered from at least one of the psychiatric conditions examined in this review (Chua et al., 2004; Keita et al., 2017).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Anxiety prevalence percentage was highest in GAD-7 studies, likely due to the low cut-off score used”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The protocol for this study was published in the PROSPERO register (CRD42021239505, 2021).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Materials and methods > Study design
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Meta-analysis, as outlined in the protocol, was not deemed appropriate due to the expected clinical heterogeneity between studies.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Materials and methods > Data analysis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Symptoms were lower than the prevalence reported in a control group from one of the included studies (Noviello et al., 2021) and comparable to similar studies in the general public during the pandemic (Salari et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; Krishnamoorthy et al., 2020), indicating relatively limited long-term anxiety in COVID-19 patients.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Noviello et al., 2021
- Not checked yetcites Salari et al., 2020
- Not checked yetcites Zhang et al., 2020
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: General-population mental health levels during the pandemic provide a valid benchmark for long-term mental health after COVID-19 infection.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We report the findings in adherence to the PRISMA guidelines.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Materials and methods > Study design
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The definition of ‘long-term’ was pre-specified in our protocol”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Materials and methods > Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“It found similarities in the trajectory of other coronavirus epidemics with a low prevalence of mental health conditions (Rogers et al., 2020).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rogers et al., 2020 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Materials and methods > Risk of bias assessment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Moreover, the average GAD-7 scores from Hasan et al., 2021 and Gou et al. (2020) were higher than the general public before the COVID-19 pandemic in a German population (Löwe et al., 2008) while the average scores from Park et al., (2020b)) and Kang et al. (2021) were lower indicating uncertainty.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Löwe et al., 2008
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two investigators (TS and NWB) independently screened articles for inclusion.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Materials and methods > Data extraction
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Even when disregarding the potential for over-sensitivity of diagnosis in the included studies, the overall prevalence for anxiety was lower compared with SARS, MERS, and ebola epidemics (Chua et al., 2004; Keita et al., 2017; Jeong et al., 2016) than studies that looked at short-term symptoms (Krishnamoorthy et al., 2020).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A sensitivity analysis was conducted comparing outcome prevalence from at least 3 months post-diagnosis (excluding severe COVID-19 cases).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Materials and methods > Data analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Two independent authors (NWB and TS) assessed the risk of bias (RoB) using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) (Wells et al., 2000).”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Materials and methods > Risk of bias assessment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wells et al., 2000
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Conversely, Xiong et al. (2021) had the lowest prevalence which is likely to be due to clinical interviews which are less likely to result in overestimation compared to self-rated questionnaires.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Xiong et al. (2021) source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Longer-term assessment may also offer more reliable estimates and may also account for participants’ psychiatric history, the severity of COVID-19, and the lack of comparable controls.”
§ Long-term effects of COVID-19 on mental health: A systematic review > Discussion > Strengths and limitations
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The findings from adult hospital or treatment-centre samples can be generalised to COVID-19 survivors outside those settings.
“All studies examined an adult sample from treatment centres or hospitals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mental health symptoms measured at follow-up are attributable to direct COVID-19 infection rather than to indirect pandemic effects.
“However, the long-term effect from direct COVID-19 infection has been associated with no or mild symptoms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
General-population mental health levels during the pandemic provide a valid benchmark for long-term mental health after COVID-19 infection.
“Studies exhibited the long-term prevalence of anxiety, depression, PTSD, and sleep disturbances to be comparable to general population levels.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The COVID-19 pandemic overall has been associated with worsening psychiatric symptoms.
“The overall effect of the pandemic has been linked with worsening psychiatric symptoms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The PCL-5, TSQ, DTS, and IES-R instruments provide comparable measures of PTSD.
“As for PTSD, overall PCL-5 and TSQ scores were lower compared to DTS and IES-R scores.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Studies conducted 1 year on from the onset of the pandemic have shown that its impact on mental health was on-going (Benke et al., 2022; Bourmistova et al., 2022; Fountoulakis et al., 2022)”
From Social connections combat loneliness and promote wellbeing among college students coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic (2025) · cites this paper as Bourmistova et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
PTSD follow-up trend reverses between results and discussion
MajorThe results report higher PTSD prevalence after more than three months than before three months. The discussion instead says the sensitivity analysis found a decrease with longer follow-up.
“PTSD prevalence in cohorts followed up longer than three months was slightly higher than less than three months follow-up at 18.99% and 12.19% respectively (Supplement 8).”
“Finally, the sensitivity analysis revealed a decrease in PTSD prevalence with longer follow-up.”
Anxiety instrument counts total 14 studies, not 15
MinorThe listed instrument groups contain five GAD-7 studies, one STAI-S study, seven HADS studies and one clinical-interview study. These add to 14, rather than the stated 15.
Reported 15 · recomputed 14
“Fifteen studies assessed anxiety in mild to moderate COVID-19 cases (see Fig. 2 ), five using the GAD-7”
Mendez's PTSD score is assigned to conflicting instruments
MinorMendez is listed among studies using DTS, but its reported mean is subsequently described as a PCL-5 score.
“two studies using the DTS (Alemanno et al., 2021, Mendez et al., 2021)”
“Average PCL-5 scores of 8.00 (95% CI = 6.57, 9.43), 10.99 (95% CI = 9.37, 12.61) and 8.77 (95% CI = 6.42, 11.12) were reported by Guo et al. (2020), Mendez et al., 2021 and Kang et al. (2021) respectively.”
HADS anxiety study count changes from seven to six
MinorThe anxiety results first list seven studies using HADS, then describe six studies using it.
“seven using HADS(Morin et al., 2021, Noviello et al., 2021, Poyraz et al., 2021, Tanriverdi et al., 2021, Tomasoni et al., 2021, van den Borst et al., 2021, Venturelli et al., 2021)”
“Out of the six studies that used the HADS, only two reported mean scores both indicating an overall normal level of anxiety.”
The sole STAI-S anxiety study is attributed to different authors
MinorThe instrument list identifies Mazza as the one STAI-S study, but the subsequent description identifies Mendez as the only study using STAI-S.
“one using STAI-S (Mazza, 2021)”
“The only study using the STAI-S identified minor symptoms of anxiety with Mendez et al., 2021 reporting 33.66 (95% CI = 31.88, 35.44)”
Competing-interest declarations disagree
MinorOne declaration discloses an honorarium received by RS, while the later declaration says all authors have no conflicts of interest.
“RS has in the last three years received an honorarium from Lundbeck. BC, NB, TS and PB declare no conflicts of interest.”
“All authors declare no conflicts of Interest.”
Citations
Cites
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China
Huang, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, G., Xu, J., Gu, X., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5 · Cited by 48,884
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3532534 · Cited by 16,394
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8 · Cited by 16,378
Santomauro, D. F., Mantilla Herrera, A. M., Shadid, J., Zheng, P., Ashbaugh, C., Pigott, D. M., Abbafati, C., Adolph, C., Amlag, J. O., Aravkin, A. Y., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02143-7 · Cited by 5,444 · cited 1×
“This suggests that the global increase in mental health sequelae reported by Santomauro et al. (2021) is more likely due to psychosocial factors rather than a direct long-term effect of the virus.”
BackgroundNalbandian, A., Sehgal, K., Gupta, A., Madhavan, M. V., McGroder, C., Stevens, J. S., Cook, J. R., Nordvig, A. S., Shalev, D., Sehrawat, T. S., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z · Cited by 4,862
Löwe, B., Decker, O., Müller, S., Brähler, E., Schellberg, D., Herzog, W., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2008) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e318160d093 · Cited by 4,527 · cited 1×
“(2020) were higher than the general public before the COVID-19 pandemic in a German population (Löwe et al., 2008) while the average scores from Park et al.”
BackgroundThe role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target
Miller, A. H., & Raison, C. L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2015.5 · Cited by 3,942
Salari, N., Hosseinian-Far, A., Jalali, R., Vaisi-Raygani, A., Rasoulpoor, S., Mohammadi, M., Rasoulpoor, S., & Khaledi-Paveh, B. (2020) · Globalization and Health · doi:10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w · Cited by 3,560
COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence
Vindegaard, N., & Benros, M. E. (2020) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048 · Cited by 3,221 · cited 1×
“In addition, psychological, social, and job-related factors have also been shown to be associated with poor mental health outcomes (Vindegaard and Benros, 2020).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
7 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Darley, 2021, Persistent symptoms up to four months after community and hospital-managed SARS-CoV-2 infection, The Medical Journal of Australia, 10.5694/mja2.50963 · DOI
- Hasan, 2021, Mental Health of the COVID-19 Patients in Bangladesh. Mymensingh medical journal, MMJ, 30, 189
- Yu, 2020, Prevalence of sleep disturbances during COVID-19 outbreak in an urban Chinese population: a cross-sectional study, Sleep Med., 74, 18, 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.07.009 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Halat, D. H., Soltani, A., Dalli, R., Alsarraj, L., & Malki, A. M. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12134425 · Cited by 444
“Within the first year of the pandemic, there was a 25% increase in the prevalence of depression and anxiety worldwide [13], with documented worsening of psychiatric symptoms [14], especially during lockdown, with the associated social isolation [15,16].”
BackgroundBertuccio, P., Amerio, A., Grande, E., La Vecchia, C., Costanza, A., Aguglia, A., Berardelli, I., Serafini, G., Amore, M., Pompili, M., et al. (2024) · eClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102506 · Cited by 212
“45 In conclusion, geographical heterogeneity in suicide mortality patterns among young individuals and the worrying upward trends in some countries highlight the importance of addressing this complex issue, on a global scale, with a multidisciplinary approach.”
BackgroundFatigue and cognitive impairment after COVID-19: A prospective multicentre study
Hartung, T. J., Neumann, C., Bahmer, T. J., Chaplinskaya-Sobol, I., Endres, M., Geritz, J., Hæusler, K. G., Heuschmann, P. U., Hildesheim, H., Hinz, A., et al. (2022) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101651 · Cited by 168
“40,41 Indeed, mean anxiety scores on the GAD-7 were not higher in our patient sample than in a German general population survey during the same period.”
Hossain, M. M., Nesa, F., Das, J., Aggad, R., Tasnim, S., Bairwa, M. L., Ma, P., & Ramı́rez, G. (2022) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114814 · Cited by 184
Berg, S. K., Palm, P., Nygaard, U., Bundgaard, H., Petersen, M. N. S., Rosenkilde, S., Thorsted, A. B., Ersbøll, A. K., Thygesen, L. C., Nielsen, S. D., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(22)00154-7 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourmistrova, N. W., Solomon, T., Braude, P., Strawbridge, R., & Carter, B.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- North Bristol NHS Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Carter, Ben
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 299
- Pages
- 118-125
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8758130
- OpenAlex
- W3213906311
- Semantic Scholar
- 822529366cca7ca42b197910253d2232de588965
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 69
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, long-term psychological effects, post-COVID-19 mental health, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep disorders, insomnia
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review