Cited by 13Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Establishing the measurement precision of the patient health questionnaire in an adolescent sample

Hodgson, Caroline G., Bonifay, Wes, Yang, Wenxi, Herman, Keith C.·2023·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Technically sound measures are necessary for accurately identifying youth at risk for depression, but many studies rely on classical test theory metrics or adult samples to evaluate measures. This study examined the use of the PHQ-8, a common and freely available pediatric depression screener, in an adolescent sample using item response theory (IRT).Methods Secondary analyses were conducted on data from a study conducted in Midwestern middle schools in which 1224 youth completed the PHQ-8 as part of a battery of surveys. Polytomous IRT analyses (a Graded Response Model) were used to evaluate the PHQ-8. Items were examined for their ability to distinguish between respondents of different latent depression severity and for differential item functioning (DIF) across demographic categories.Results All PHQ-8 items had adequate discriminative abilities. Items measuring anhedonia and psychomotor disturbances performed relatively poorly, and items measuring somatic symptoms (appetite and sleep) were most informative when respondents endorsed extreme response options ("not at all" or "nearly every day"). No DIF was found across grade level or race, but several items were flagged for DIF by gender and student income level.Limitations These results might not be generalizable to a broader youth population due to administration setting and the unique demographic characteristics of this sample (76.0 % African American).Conclusions Tools such as the PHQ-8 are appropriate to quickly screen for depression in adolescents, but further scrutiny of adolescent response patterns is warranted. Future research should examine items measuring anhedonia and psychomotor and somatic disturbances in adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2023.09.013

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodgson, C. G., Bonifay, W., Yang, W., & Herman, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Yang, Wenxi
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
342
Pages
76-84
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386648266
Cited by
13
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute of Education Sciences (R305A130143)
  • University of Missouri
  • U.S. Department of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
PHQ-8, Patient Health Questionnaire, adolescent depression, depression screening, measurement precision, item response theory, graded response model, differential item functioning, anhedonia, psychomotor disorders, somatic symptoms, gender differences, socioeconomic status, junior high school students
MeSH terms
Patient Health Questionnaire, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Depression, Humans, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review