Cited by 631Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

The lifetime prevalence of child sexual abuse and sexual assault assessed in late adolescence

Finkelhor, David, Shattuck, Anne, Turner, Heather A., Hamby, Sherry L.·2014·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose To estimate the likelihood that a recent cohort of children would be exposed to sexual abuse and sexual assault by age 17 in the United States.Methods This analysis draws on three very similarly designed national telephone surveys of youth in 2003, 2008, and 2011, resulting in a pooled sample of 708 17-year-olds, 781 15-year-olds, and 804 16-year-olds.Results The lifetime experience of 17-year-olds with sexual abuse and sexual assault was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.8-33.5) for girls and 5.1% (95% CI 2.6-7.6) for boys. The lifetime experience with sexual abuse and sexual assault at the hands of adult perpetrators exclusively was 11.2% (95% CI 6.4-16.1) for females and 1.9% (95% CI .5-3.4) for males. For females, considerable risk for sexual abuse and assault was concentrated in late adolescence, as the rate rose from 16.8% (95% CI 11.5-22.2) for 15-year-old females to 26.6% (95% CI 19.8-33.5) for 17-year-old females. For males, it rose from 4.3% (95% CI 1.9-6.8) at 15 years to 5.1% (2.6-7.6) at 17 years.Conclusions Self-report surveys in late adolescence reveal high rates of lifetime experience with sexual abuse and sexual assault at the hands of both adults and peers. Because of high continuing victimization during the late teen years, assessments are most complete when conducted among the oldest youth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.026

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finkelhor, D., Shattuck, A., Turner, H. A., & Hamby, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
  • Sewanee: The University of the South (US)
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
329-333
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144918153
Cited by
631
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 7
FWCI
39.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, sexual assault, lifetime prevalence, late adolescence, adolescent victimization, adult perpetrators, gender differences, self-report questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review